Factors affecting women's decision between uterine-preserving versus hysterectomy-based surgery for pelvic organ prolapse

被引:4
|
作者
Ramage, Kaylee [1 ]
Ducey, Ariel [2 ]
Scime, Natalie, V [1 ,3 ]
Knox, Erin [2 ]
Brennand, Erin A. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Fac Arts, Dept Sociol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 2500 Univ Dr Northwest, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
hysterectomy; pelvic organ prolapse; shared decision-making; surgery; uterine preservation; LIFETIME RISK; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1177/17455057231181015
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background:Given the prevalence of women seeking surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP), there is a need to understand women's decision-making regarding uterine-preserving versus hysterectomy-based surgeries. Historically, hysterectomy-based surgeries have been the preferred treatment for pelvic organ prolapse; however, contemporary evidence supports uterine-preserving surgeries as equivalent. At present, the lack of information available to the general public and limited options presented at surgical consultation for pelvic organ prolapse may hinder women's autonomy as they navigate surgical treatment. Objectives:To examine the factors affecting women's decision-making processes regarding uterine-preserving or hysterectomy-based surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Design:This is a qualitative study. Methods:We conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews with women seeking surgery for pelvic organ prolapse to explore the factors affecting women's decision-making between hysterectomy-based and uterine-preserving surgeries. Results:Women (n = 26) used clinical and personal factors to determine which surgery was best. Women noted that the lack of evidence (clinical and/or anecdotal) available to them hindered their decision-making, causing them to rely more on their own interpretations of the evidence, what they perceived to be "normal," and what their surgeon recommended. Even with standardized discussion regarding the existing clinical equipoise between surgeries at the clinical consultation, some women still had misperceptions that hysterectomy-based surgery would convey the lowest risk of prolapse recurrence and be best for severe prolapse. Conclusion:There is a need for more transparency in discussions about prolapse and the factors affecting women's decision-making for surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Clinicians should be prepared to offer the option of hysterectomy-based or uterine-preserving surgeries and to clearly explain the clinical equipoise between these procedures.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Commentary: Factors affecting patient choice for continued observation versus intervention for pelvic organ prolapse
    Alexandra Dubinskaya
    Kaitlin Renkosiak
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2021, 32 : 279 - 279
  • [32] The distribution of pelvic organ support defects in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery and compartment specific risk factors
    Payebto Zoua, Emmanuel
    Boulvain, Michel
    Dallenbach, Patrick
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (02) : 405 - 409
  • [33] Patient Beliefs Regarding Hysterectomy in Women Seeking Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Findings in a Predominantly Hispanic Population
    Wong, Keri
    Jakus-Waldman, Sharon
    Yazdany, Tajnoos
    [J]. FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 20 (05): : 267 - 271
  • [34] Dutch women's attitudes towards hysterectomy and uterus preservation in surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse
    van Ijsselmuiden, Melanie N.
    Detollenaere, Renee J.
    Gerritse, Maaike B. E.
    Kluivers, Kirsten B.
    Bongers, Marlies Y.
    van Eijndhoven, Hugo W. F.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2018, 220 : 79 - 83
  • [35] Prospective evaluation of outcome of vaginal pessaries versus surgery in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse
    Zeelha Abdool
    Ranee Thakar
    Abdul H. Sultan
    Reeba S. Oliver
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2011, 22 : 273 - 278
  • [36] Prospective evaluation of outcome of vaginal pessaries versus surgery in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse
    Abdool, Zeelha
    Thakar, Ranee
    Sultan, Abdul H.
    Oliver, Reeba S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2011, 22 (03) : 273 - 278
  • [37] PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF OUTCOME OF VAGINAL PESSARIES VERSUS SURGERY IN WOMEN WITH SYMPTOMATIC PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE
    Abdool, Z.
    Thakar, R.
    Sultan, A. H.
    Oliver, R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2009, 20 : S156 - S157
  • [38] Role of concurrent vaginal hysterectomy in the outcomes of mesh-based vaginal pelvic organ prolapse surgery
    Forde, James C.
    Chughtai, Bilal
    Anger, Jennifer T.
    Mao, Jialin
    Sedrakyan, Art
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 28 (08) : 1183 - 1195
  • [39] Pelvic organ prolapse surgery after different hysterectomy methods: a population-based cohort study
    Klimczak, A.
    Kilic, G.
    Unlu, B. S.
    Lin, Y-L
    Kuo, Y-F
    Borahay, M.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 46 (03): : 466 - 472
  • [40] Role of concurrent vaginal hysterectomy in the outcomes of mesh-based vaginal pelvic organ prolapse surgery
    James C. Forde
    Bilal Chughtai
    Jennifer T. Anger
    Jialin Mao
    Art Sedrakyan
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2017, 28 : 1183 - 1195