Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse

被引:153
|
作者
Korbly, Nicole B. [1 ]
Kassis, Nadine C. [2 ]
Good, Meadow M. [3 ]
Richardson, Monica L. [4 ]
Book, Nicole M. [5 ]
Yip, Sallis [6 ]
Saguan, Docile [7 ]
Gross, Carey [10 ]
Evans, Janelle [8 ]
Lopes, Vrishali V. [1 ]
Harvie, Heidi S. [9 ]
Sung, Vivian W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Women & Infants Hosp Rhode Isl, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Providence, RI 02903 USA
[2] Indiana Univ Health, Methodist Hosp, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[4] Stanford Sch Med, Palo Alto, CA USA
[5] Riverside Methodist Hosp, Columbus, OH 43214 USA
[6] Yale Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
[7] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Atlanta, GA USA
[8] Christ Hosp, Cincinnati, OH 45219 USA
[9] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[10] Cleveland Clin Florida, Dept Gynecol, Weston, FL USA
关键词
hysterectomy; patient preference; prolapse; uterine; preservation; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; FLOOR DISORDERS; PREDICTORS; ATTITUDES; SURGERY; PESSARY; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.003
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and to describe predictors of preference for uterine preservation. STUDY DESIGN: This multicenter, cross-sectional study evaluated patient preferences for uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in women with prolapse symptoms who were being examined for initial urogynecologic evaluation. Before meeting the physician, the women completed a questionnaire that asked them to indicate their prolapse treatment preference (uterine preservation vs hysterectomy) for scenarios in which the efficacy of treatment varied. Patient characteristics that were associated with preferences were determined, and predictors for uterine preservation preference were identified with multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Two hundred thirteen women participated. Assuming outcomes were equal between hysterectomy and uterine preservation, 36% of the women preferred uterine preservation; 20% of the women preferred hysterectomy, and 44% of the women had no strong preference. If uterine preservation was superior, 46% of the women preferred uterine preservation, and 11% of the women preferred hysterectomy. If hysterectomy was superior, 21% of the women still preferred uterine preservation, despite inferior efficacy. On multivariable logistic regression, women in the South had decreased odds of preferring uterine preservation compared with women in the Northeast (odds ratio [OR], 0.17; 95% CI, 0.05-0.66). Women with at least some college education (OR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.08-7.62) and those who believed that the uterus is important for their sense of self (OR, 28.2; 95% CI, 5.00-158.7) had increased odds for preferring uterine preservation. CONCLUSION: A higher proportion of women with prolapse symptoms who were examined for urogynecologic evaluation preferred uterine preservation, compared with hysterectomy. Geographic region, education level, and belief that the uterus is important for a sense of self were predictors of preference for uterine preservation.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Response: Clinician perspectives on hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery
    Porcari, Irene
    Bosco, Mariachiara
    Zorzato, Pier Carlo
    Garzon, Simone
    Uccella, Stefano
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2025,
  • [2] Comparison of UpholdTM Vaginal Mesh Procedure with Hysterectomy or Uterine Preservation for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Chin-Ru Ker
    Kun-Ling Lin
    Zi-Xi Loo
    Yung-Shun Juan
    Cheng-Yu Long
    Scientific Reports, 8
  • [3] Comparison of Uphold™ Vaginal Mesh Procedure with Hysterectomy or Uterine Preservation for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Ker, Chin-Ru
    Lin, Kun-Ling
    Loo, Zi-Xi
    Juan, Yung-Shun
    Long, Cheng-Yu
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [4] Incidence of Occult Uterine Pathology in Women Undergoing Hysterectomy With Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
    Ackenbom, Mary F.
    Giugale, Lauren E.
    Wang, Yanting
    Shepherd, Jonathan P.
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 22 (05): : 332 - 335
  • [5] Anatomic outcomes after pelvic-organ-prolapse surgery-comparing uterine preservation with hysterectomy
    Marschalek, Julian
    Trofaier, Marie-Louise
    Yerlikaya, Guelen
    Hanzal, Engelbert
    Koelbl, Heinz
    Ott, Johannes
    Umek, Wolfgang
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2014, 183 : 33 - 36
  • [6] Uterine preservation for advanced pelvic organ prolapse repair: Anatomical results and patient satisfaction
    Fink, Keshet
    Ben Shachar, Inbar
    Braun, Naama Marcus
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2016, 42 (04): : 773 - 778
  • [7] Dutch women's attitudes towards hysterectomy and uterus preservation in surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse
    van Ijsselmuiden, Melanie N.
    Detollenaere, Renee J.
    Gerritse, Maaike B. E.
    Kluivers, Kirsten B.
    Bongers, Marlies Y.
    van Eijndhoven, Hugo W. F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2018, 220 : 79 - 83
  • [8] Uterine Inversion Presenting as Pelvic Organ Prolapse in a Patient with Leiomyosarcoma
    Free, Leanne
    Ruhotina, Merima
    Napoe, Gnankang Sarah
    Beffa, Lindsey
    Wohlrab, Kyle
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 26 (07) : 1217 - 1218
  • [9] Comparison of laparoscopic hysteropectopexy and vaginal hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse
    Lee, Ji N.
    Yim, Mi H.
    Na, Yong J.
    Song, Yong J.
    Kim, Hwi G.
    MINERVA OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 76 (03) : 257 - 263
  • [10] Uterine Preservation vs Hysterectomy in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis and Clinical Practice Guidelines
    Meriwether, Kate V.
    Antosh, Danielle D.
    Olivera, Cedric K.
    Kim-Fine, Shunaha
    Balk, Ethan M.
    Murphy, Miles
    Grimes, Cara L.
    Sleemi, Ambereen
    Singh, Ruchira
    Dieter, Alexis A.
    Crisp, Catrina C.
    Rahn, David D.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2018, 73 (12) : 680 - 681