Information sharing in an MTO supply chain with upstream adjustments

被引:4
|
作者
Zhang, Jian [1 ]
Nault, Barrie R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Haskayne Sch Business, 2500 Univ DR NW, Calgary, AB, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Supply chain management; Information sharing; Make-to-order; Decentralized coordination; Customized delivery; DEMAND; COOPERATION; COMPETITION; EXCHANGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2022.10.034
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We study a make-to-order (MTO) supply chain that includes a manufacturer and its supplier, both of which are MTO firms. Once a manufacturer receives an order from a customer, the manufacturer orders needed parts from its supplier. The supplier can adjust its delivery of parts in terms of locations, batches, schedule, etc., to address the manufacturer's delivery preference. Information sharing is required for the supplier to make a delivery adjustment. We model the problem as a multi-stage game between the sup-plier and the manufacturer to analyze their incentives to share information. We abstract the information to be shared as the supplier's production load (downstream information sharing) and the manufacturer's ideal delivery plan (upstream information sharing). We find that the supplier shares information if its production load is distributed over higher values. The manufacturer shares information if the supplier's production load is low enough or if the distribution of production loads is less than a threshold - de-pending on whether the supplier shares information. We also show that the supplier can design a price ceiling mechanism to motivate upstream information sharing, and that a price ceiling increases the sup-ply chain's profit and yields equivalent customer welfare. Finally, we show how an outside option can provide a naturally formed price ceiling. Our results find the root cause why information sharing in a MTO supply chain is sometimes easy to achieve, and sometimes difficult. The insights from this research can be easily applied in other types of supply chains with similar structures. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 112
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Information Sharing in Supply Chain: Modeling the Barriers
    Pujara, A. A.
    Kant, R.
    Singh, M. D.
    [J]. 2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2011, : 918 - 922
  • [22] Supply chain management and information sharing capabilities
    Abu-Shanab, Emad
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, VOL 1 AND 2, 2007, : 8 - 14
  • [23] Research on Information Sharing in Supply Chain Management
    Wei, Wang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM 2016: ASIA-PACIFIC PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2016, : 20 - 28
  • [24] Impact of information sharing on supply chain performance
    David C. Hall
    Can Saygin
    [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2012, 58 : 397 - 409
  • [25] Revenue Sharing and Information Leakage in a Supply Chain
    Kong, Guangwen
    Rajagopalan, Sampath
    Zhang, Hao
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2013, 59 (03) : 556 - 572
  • [26] Antecedents and Outcome of Information Sharing in Supply Chain
    Wang, Zhiqiang
    Zhou, Qiang
    Ye, Fei
    [J]. THIRTEENTH WUHAN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-BUSINESS, 2014, 2014, : 714 - 718
  • [27] Information Sharing and Value in Construction Supply Chain
    Zhao Jie
    [J]. 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING (16TH), VOLS I AND II, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 1942 - 1949
  • [28] Impact of information sharing on supply chain performance
    Hall, David C.
    Saygin, Can
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 58 (1-4): : 397 - 409
  • [29] Information sharing in a supply chain with learning effect
    Wu Jianghua
    Xin Zhai
    [J]. GLOBALIZATION CHALLENGE AND MANAGEMENT TRANSFORMATION, VOLS I - III, 2007, : 239 - 244
  • [30] Supply chain management and information sharing capabilities
    Abu-Shanab, Emad
    [J]. Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management, ECKM, 2007, : 8 - 14