Development of Automated Delivery Quality Assurance Analysis Software for Helical Tomotherapy

被引:0
|
作者
Yoon, Y. H. [1 ,2 ]
Shin, Han-Back [1 ]
Han, M. C. [1 ]
Kim, Hojin [1 ]
Kim, D. W. [1 ]
Hong, Chae-Seon [1 ]
Kim, Jihun [3 ,5 ]
Kim, J. S. [1 ,2 ,4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Heavy Ion Therapy Res Inst, Yonsei Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol,Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Med Phys & Biomed Engn Lab MPBEL, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Gangnam Severance Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Oncosoft Inc, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, 211 Eonju Ro, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
patient-specific quality assurance; gamma analysis; automatione; tomotherapy; setup uncertainty; RADIOCHROMIC FILM DOSIMETRY; STEP-AND-SHOOT; IMRT; VERIFICATION; PHANTOM; QA;
D O I
10.1177/15330338231175781
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundTo develop a fully automated in-house gamma analysis software for the "Cheese" phantom-based delivery quality assurance (QA) of helical tomotherapy plans. MethodsThe developed in-house software was designed to automate several procedures, which need to be manually performed using commercial software packages. The region of interest for the analysis was automatically selected by cropping out film edges and thresholding dose values (>10% of the maximum dose). The film-measured dose was automatically aligned to the computed dose using an image registration algorithm. An optimal film scaling factor was determined to maximize the percentage of pixels passing gamma (gamma passing rate) between the measured and computed doses (3%/3 mm criteria). This gamma analysis was repeated by introducing setup uncertainties in the anterior-posterior direction. For 73 tomotherapy plans, the gamma analysis results using the developed software were compared to those analyzed by medical physicists using a commercial software package. ResultsThe developed software successfully automated the gamma analysis for the tomotherapy delivery quality assurance. The gamma passing rate (GPR) calculated by the developed software was higher than that by the clinically used software by 3.0%, on average. While, for 1 of the 73 plans, the GPR by the manual gamma analysis was higher than 90% (pass/fail criteria), the gamma analysis using the developed software resulted in fail (GPR < 90%). ConclusionsThe use of automated and standardized gamma analysis software can improve both the clinical efficiency and veracity of the analysis results. Furthermore, the gamma analyses with various film scaling factors and setup uncertainties will provide clinically useful information for further investigations.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of Automated Delivery Quality Assurance Analysis Software for Helical Tomotherapy
    Yoon, Y. H.
    Shin, Han-Back
    Han, M. C.
    Kim, Hojin
    Kim, D. W.
    Hong, Chae-Seon
    Kim, Jihun
    Kim, J. S.
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2023, 22
  • [2] TomoMQA: Automated analysis program for MVCT quality assurance of helical tomotherapy
    Han, Min Cheol
    Hong, Chae-Seon
    Chang, Kyung Hwan
    Kim, Jihun
    Han, Su Chul
    Kim, Dong Wook
    Park, Kwangwoo
    Kim, Min-Joo
    Shin, Han Back
    Lee, Se Hyung
    Kim, Jin Sung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (06): : 151 - 157
  • [3] Helical tomotherapy quality assurance
    Balog, John
    Soisson, Emilie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 71 (01): : S113 - S117
  • [4] Evaluation of the "Delivery Analysis™" software for patient's specific quality assurance on tomotherapy
    Vallet, V.
    Schopfer, M.
    Moeckli, R.
    [J]. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2016, 192 (11) : 867 - 867
  • [5] Helical tomotherapy quality assurance using sinogram analysis
    Mahan, S
    Ramsey, C
    Chase, D
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (06) : 1832 - 1832
  • [6] Helical tomotherapy quality assurance with ArcCHECK
    Chapman, David
    Barnett, Rob
    Yartsev, Slav
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2014, 39 (02) : 159 - 162
  • [7] Helical tomotherapy dynamic quality assurance
    Balog, John
    Holmes, Tim
    Vaden, Richard
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (10) : 3939 - 3950
  • [8] Quality Assurance Procedures for Helical Tomotherapy
    Haaren, P.
    Althof, V.
    Kramer, D.
    Westendorp, H.
    Minken, A.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [9] Quality assurance of a helical tomotherapy machine
    Fenwick, JD
    Tomé, WA
    Jaradat, HA
    Hui, SK
    James, JA
    Balog, JP
    DeSouza, CN
    Lucas, DB
    Olivera, GH
    Mackie, TR
    Paliwal, BR
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (13): : 2933 - 2953
  • [10] Statistical Analysis of Treatment Planning Parameters for Prediction of Delivery Quality Assurance Failure for Helical Tomotherapy
    Chang, Kyung Hwan
    Lee, Young Hyun
    Park, Byung Hun
    Han, Min Cheol
    Kim, Jihun
    Kim, Hojin
    Cho, Min-Seok
    Kang, Hyokyeong
    Lee, Ho
    Kim, Dong Wook
    Park, Kwangwoo
    Cho, Jaeho
    Kim, Yong Bae
    Kim, Jin Sung
    Hong, Chae-Seon
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2020, 19