Life cycle assessment of different strawberry production methods in Germany with a particular focus on plastic emissions

被引:8
|
作者
Galafton, Christina [1 ]
Maga, Daniel [1 ]
Sonnemann, Guido [2 ]
Thonemann, Nils [3 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Inst Environm Safety & Energy Technol U, Business Unit Sustainabil & Participat, Osterfelder Str 3, D-46047 Oberhausen, Germany
[2] Univ Bordeaux, Inst Mol Sci, Bordeaux INP, ISM UMR 5255, F-33400 Talence, France
[3] Tech Univ Denmark DTU, Dept Environm & Resource Engn, Sect Quantitat Sustainabil Assessment, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
来源
关键词
PEF; Environmental footprint; Carbon footprint; Agriculture; Mulching; Tunnel; Greenhouse; Plasticulture; Plastic pollution; IMPACT; YIELD; FIELD;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-023-02167-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
PurposeUsing plastic for strawberry cultivation (so-called plasticulture) is widespread to extend cultivation, reduce weed stress and water and nutrient demand, and protect plants. We assess the environmental impacts of different plasticulture methods, including possible impacts caused by the (accidental) emission of plastics. The goals are to help farmers determine the most environmentally friendly cultivation technique and to test the inclusion of plastic pollution in life cycle assessment (LCA).MethodsAn LCA is conducted for a baseline scenario without plasticulture and 11 plasticulture scenarios. The scenarios are modeled using the regionalized ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off database. The functional unit is 1 kg of strawberries of marketable quality at the farm gate produced in the year 2021. The amounts of fertilizer, irrigation, and strawberry output of the scenarios are adapted depending on the plasticulture method based on an extensive literature review. The environmental impacts are assessed using the life cycle impact assessment methods of the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) recommended by the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, which is extended to account for plastic-related impacts. The impacts are normalized, weighted, and aggregated, resulting in one single impact score per scenario.Results and discussionThe scenarios using either a combination of conventional mulch film and row cover or biodegradable mulch film have the lowest total impacts; a macro tunnel or greenhouse causes the highest impacts. There seems to be no trade-off between maximizing productivity and lowering environmental impacts: the scenario with the highest yield also has one of the lowest overall impacts. Only direct emissions are considered regarding plastic pollution. Besides, the plastic pollution impact category is currently limited to the persistence of plastic in the environment and is extendable to but is not yet accounting for exposure and effect of plastic emission on humans and ecosystems.ConclusionPlasticulture can increase the yield and reduce environmental impacts for strawberry cultivation compared to open field cultivation. With the used normalization and weighting factors, plastic pollution makes up a considerable share of the overall environmental impact of strawberry cultivation, supporting the recent efforts of different research groups to include plastic emissions in LCA by developing suitable characterization factors.
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 625
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Environmental life cycle assessment of reverse osmosis desalination: The influence of different life cycle impact assessment methods on the characterization results
    Zhou, Jin
    Chang, Victor W. -C.
    Fane, Anthony G.
    DESALINATION, 2011, 283 : 227 - 236
  • [32] Life cycle assessment of different variants of sodium chromate production in Poland
    Kowalski, Zygmunt
    Kulczycka, Joanna
    Wzorek, Zbigniew
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2007, 15 (01) : 28 - 37
  • [33] Life cycle assessment of Virginia mallow production with different fertilisation options
    Krzyzaniak, Michal
    Stolarski, Mariusz Jerzy
    Warminski, Kazimierz
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 177 : 824 - 836
  • [34] Life cycle assessment for Ambrox® production from different chemical routes
    Ivan Martinez-Guido, Sergio
    Sengupta, Debalina
    Napoles-Rivera, Fabricio
    Betzabe Gonzalez-Campos, J.
    del Rio, Rosa E.
    Maria Ponce-Ortega, Jose
    El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 130 : 202 - 212
  • [35] Techno economic and life cycle assessment of lycopene production from tomato peels using different extraction methods
    Yadav, Rajendra D. D.
    Dhamole, Pradip B. B.
    BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2023, 14 (20) : 25495 - 25511
  • [36] Evaluation of an environmental profile comparison for nanocellulose production and supply chain by applying different life cycle assessment methods
    Turk, Janez
    Oven, Primoz
    Poljansek, Ida
    Lesek, Anja
    Knez, Friderik
    Rebec, Katja Malovrh
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 247
  • [37] Comparison of dysprosium production from different resources by life cycle assessment
    Zapp, Petra
    Marx, Josefine
    Schreiber, Andrea
    Friedrich, Bernd
    Vossenkaul, Daniel
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 130 : 248 - 259
  • [38] Life cycle assessment of cardoon production system in different areas of Italy
    Razza, F.
    Sollima, L.
    Falce, M.
    Costa, R. M. S.
    Toscano, V.
    Novelli, A.
    Ciancolini, A.
    Raccuia, S. A.
    IX International Symposium on Artichoke, Cardoon and Their Wild Relatives, 2016, 1147 : 329 - 334
  • [39] How to account for plastic emissions in life cycle inventory analysis?
    Maga, Daniel
    Thonemann, Nils
    Strothmann, Philip
    Sonnemann, Guido
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 168
  • [40] Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of ceramic sanitaryware: focus on the production process and analysis of scenario
    Desole, Maria Pia
    Fedele, Lorenzo
    Gisario, Annamaria
    Barletta, Massimiliano
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 21 (02) : 1649 - 1670