Life cycle assessment of different strawberry production methods in Germany with a particular focus on plastic emissions

被引:8
|
作者
Galafton, Christina [1 ]
Maga, Daniel [1 ]
Sonnemann, Guido [2 ]
Thonemann, Nils [3 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Inst Environm Safety & Energy Technol U, Business Unit Sustainabil & Participat, Osterfelder Str 3, D-46047 Oberhausen, Germany
[2] Univ Bordeaux, Inst Mol Sci, Bordeaux INP, ISM UMR 5255, F-33400 Talence, France
[3] Tech Univ Denmark DTU, Dept Environm & Resource Engn, Sect Quantitat Sustainabil Assessment, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
来源
关键词
PEF; Environmental footprint; Carbon footprint; Agriculture; Mulching; Tunnel; Greenhouse; Plasticulture; Plastic pollution; IMPACT; YIELD; FIELD;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-023-02167-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
PurposeUsing plastic for strawberry cultivation (so-called plasticulture) is widespread to extend cultivation, reduce weed stress and water and nutrient demand, and protect plants. We assess the environmental impacts of different plasticulture methods, including possible impacts caused by the (accidental) emission of plastics. The goals are to help farmers determine the most environmentally friendly cultivation technique and to test the inclusion of plastic pollution in life cycle assessment (LCA).MethodsAn LCA is conducted for a baseline scenario without plasticulture and 11 plasticulture scenarios. The scenarios are modeled using the regionalized ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off database. The functional unit is 1 kg of strawberries of marketable quality at the farm gate produced in the year 2021. The amounts of fertilizer, irrigation, and strawberry output of the scenarios are adapted depending on the plasticulture method based on an extensive literature review. The environmental impacts are assessed using the life cycle impact assessment methods of the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) recommended by the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, which is extended to account for plastic-related impacts. The impacts are normalized, weighted, and aggregated, resulting in one single impact score per scenario.Results and discussionThe scenarios using either a combination of conventional mulch film and row cover or biodegradable mulch film have the lowest total impacts; a macro tunnel or greenhouse causes the highest impacts. There seems to be no trade-off between maximizing productivity and lowering environmental impacts: the scenario with the highest yield also has one of the lowest overall impacts. Only direct emissions are considered regarding plastic pollution. Besides, the plastic pollution impact category is currently limited to the persistence of plastic in the environment and is extendable to but is not yet accounting for exposure and effect of plastic emission on humans and ecosystems.ConclusionPlasticulture can increase the yield and reduce environmental impacts for strawberry cultivation compared to open field cultivation. With the used normalization and weighting factors, plastic pollution makes up a considerable share of the overall environmental impact of strawberry cultivation, supporting the recent efforts of different research groups to include plastic emissions in LCA by developing suitable characterization factors.
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 625
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Relative emissions intensity of dairy production systems: employing different functional units in life-cycle assessment
    Ross, S. A.
    Topp, C. F. E.
    Ennos, R. A.
    Chagunda, M. G. G.
    ANIMAL, 2017, 11 (08) : 1381 - 1388
  • [22] Closing plastic loop with CCUS: Life cycle assessment of a novel strategy for plastic sustainable transition and negative emissions
    Huang, Zhixin
    Deng, Shuai
    Zhang, Qi
    Zhao, Ruikai
    Li, Shuangjun
    Veselovskaya, Janna
    Kozlov, Denis
    Wang, Junyao
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2024, 208
  • [23] Evaluation of energy consumption and environmental impacts of strawberry production in different greenhouse structures using life cycle assessment (LCA) approach
    Mousavi, Masoumeh
    Taki, Morteza
    Raeini, Mahmoud Ghaseminejd
    Soheilifard, Farshad
    ENERGY, 2023, 280
  • [24] Environmental assessment of different dewatering and drying methods on the basis of life cycle assessment
    Stefaniak, J.
    Zelazna, A.
    Pawlowski, A.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 69 (04) : 783 - 788
  • [25] Nitrous oxide emissions from liquid biofuel production in life cycle assessment
    Reijnders, L.
    Huijbregts, M. A. J.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, 3 (05) : 432 - 437
  • [26] Life cycle assessment of injection moulding tools and multicomponent plastic cap production
    Agarski, Boris
    Budak, Igor
    Micunovic, Milana Ilic
    Vukelic, Djordje
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 413
  • [27] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Pyrolysis - Recycling Germany's Sorted Mixed Plastic Waste
    Hermanns, Ronja
    Kraft, Axel
    Hartmann, Philipp
    Meys, Raoul
    CHEMIE INGENIEUR TECHNIK, 2023, 95 (08) : 1259 - 1267
  • [28] Life cycle assessment on calcium zincate production methods for rechargeable batteries
    Arfelis, Sergi
    Malpartida, Irene
    Lair, Valentin
    Caldeira, Vincent
    Sazdovski, Ilija
    Bala, Alba
    Fullana-i-Palmer, Pere
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 866
  • [29] Life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment methods in biofuel production
    Prasad, Aashish
    Sotenko, Maria
    Blenkinsopp, Thomas
    Coles, Stuart R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2016, 21 (01): : 44 - 50
  • [30] Life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment methods in biofuel production
    Aashish Prasad
    Maria Sotenko
    Thomas Blenkinsopp
    Stuart R. Coles
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2016, 21 : 44 - 50