Life cycle assessment of different strawberry production methods in Germany with a particular focus on plastic emissions

被引:8
|
作者
Galafton, Christina [1 ]
Maga, Daniel [1 ]
Sonnemann, Guido [2 ]
Thonemann, Nils [3 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Inst Environm Safety & Energy Technol U, Business Unit Sustainabil & Participat, Osterfelder Str 3, D-46047 Oberhausen, Germany
[2] Univ Bordeaux, Inst Mol Sci, Bordeaux INP, ISM UMR 5255, F-33400 Talence, France
[3] Tech Univ Denmark DTU, Dept Environm & Resource Engn, Sect Quantitat Sustainabil Assessment, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
来源
关键词
PEF; Environmental footprint; Carbon footprint; Agriculture; Mulching; Tunnel; Greenhouse; Plasticulture; Plastic pollution; IMPACT; YIELD; FIELD;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-023-02167-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
PurposeUsing plastic for strawberry cultivation (so-called plasticulture) is widespread to extend cultivation, reduce weed stress and water and nutrient demand, and protect plants. We assess the environmental impacts of different plasticulture methods, including possible impacts caused by the (accidental) emission of plastics. The goals are to help farmers determine the most environmentally friendly cultivation technique and to test the inclusion of plastic pollution in life cycle assessment (LCA).MethodsAn LCA is conducted for a baseline scenario without plasticulture and 11 plasticulture scenarios. The scenarios are modeled using the regionalized ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off database. The functional unit is 1 kg of strawberries of marketable quality at the farm gate produced in the year 2021. The amounts of fertilizer, irrigation, and strawberry output of the scenarios are adapted depending on the plasticulture method based on an extensive literature review. The environmental impacts are assessed using the life cycle impact assessment methods of the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) recommended by the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, which is extended to account for plastic-related impacts. The impacts are normalized, weighted, and aggregated, resulting in one single impact score per scenario.Results and discussionThe scenarios using either a combination of conventional mulch film and row cover or biodegradable mulch film have the lowest total impacts; a macro tunnel or greenhouse causes the highest impacts. There seems to be no trade-off between maximizing productivity and lowering environmental impacts: the scenario with the highest yield also has one of the lowest overall impacts. Only direct emissions are considered regarding plastic pollution. Besides, the plastic pollution impact category is currently limited to the persistence of plastic in the environment and is extendable to but is not yet accounting for exposure and effect of plastic emission on humans and ecosystems.ConclusionPlasticulture can increase the yield and reduce environmental impacts for strawberry cultivation compared to open field cultivation. With the used normalization and weighting factors, plastic pollution makes up a considerable share of the overall environmental impact of strawberry cultivation, supporting the recent efforts of different research groups to include plastic emissions in LCA by developing suitable characterization factors.
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 625
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of different strawberry production methods in Germany with a particular focus on plastic emissions
    Christina Galafton
    Daniel Maga
    Guido Sonnemann
    Nils Thonemann
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2023, 28 : 611 - 625
  • [2] Estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from ferroalloy production using life cycle assessment with particular reference to Australia
    Haque, Nawshad
    Norgate, Terry
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 39 : 220 - 230
  • [3] Methodology to address potential impacts of plastic emissions in life cycle assessment
    Daniel Maga
    Christina Galafton
    Jan Blömer
    Nils Thonemann
    Aybüke Özdamar
    Jürgen Bertling
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2022, 27 : 469 - 491
  • [4] Life Cycle Assessment of Plastic Components in the Production of Automotive Filter
    Sutanto, Hadi
    Rumende, Kelvin
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2022, 31 (03): : 2851 - 2860
  • [5] Life cycle assessment of biohydrogen production as a transportation fuel in Germany
    Wulf, Christina
    Kaltschmitt, Martin
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 150 : 466 - 475
  • [6] A comprehensive evaluation of PV electricity production methods and life cycle energy-cost assessment of a particular system
    Ozcan, Huseyin Gunhan
    Gunerhan, Huseyin
    Yildirim, Nurdan
    Hepbasli, Arif
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 238
  • [7] Life cycle assessment of various hydrogen production methods
    Cetinkaya, E.
    Dincer, I.
    Naterer, G. F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2012, 37 (03) : 2071 - 2080
  • [8] Cradle to farm gate life cycle assessment of strawberry production in the United States
    Tabatabaie, Seyed Mohammad Hossein
    Murthy, Ganti S.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 127 : 548 - 554
  • [9] Life Cycle Assessment Model of Plastic Products: Comparing Environmental Impacts for Different Scenarios in the Production Stage
    Mannheim, Viktoria
    POLYMERS, 2021, 13 (05) : 1 - 20
  • [10] Life cycle assessment of Australian sugarcane production with a focus on sugarcane growing
    Renouf, Marguerite Anne
    Wegener, Malcolm K.
    Pagan, Robert J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2010, 15 (09): : 927 - 937