The impacts of demand and supply shocks in the dry bulk shipping market

被引:2
|
作者
Park, Sunghwa [1 ]
Kim, Hyunsok [2 ,4 ]
Kwon, Janghan [3 ]
机构
[1] Gyeongsang Natl Univ, Dept Int Trade, Jinju Si, South Korea
[2] Pusan Natl Univ, Coll Econ & Int Trade, Busan, South Korea
[3] Korea Maritime Inst, Ocean Econ Strategy Dept, Busan, South Korea
[4] 2 Busandaehak-Ro 63 Beon-Gil, Pusan 46241, South Korea
来源
关键词
Recursive structural vector autoregressive; (recursive SVAR) model; Demand and supply shocks; Bulk shipping market; Historical decomposition; Baltic dry index; Business fluctuation; OIL PRICE SHOCKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajsl.2022.10.004
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
The freight rate is a representative variable in the shipping market and is characterized by a cyclical re-lationship. Even though downturns in the shipping market, such as the shipping industry recession in the 1980s, the global financial crisis in 2008 and COVID-19 crisis in 2020, recur, few studies have analyzed the dynamic relationship between supply and demand in terms of its effect on freight rates. Thus, this study classifies the factors affecting fluctuations in dry cargo freight rates into demand, supply, and freight rate specific demand factors, which play the most important role in managing risk in the shipping market. Based on the recursive structural vector autoregressive (recursive SVAR) model, we analyze the historical con-tributions of the effects of each factor across different time periods. Two main findings are summarized as follows: first, we identify the dynamic relationship between factors affecting BDI in the shipping market, and reveal that the magnitude and direction of factors are different. Second, we verify that in an extreme situation in which freight rates exceed the normal range, the market is overheated, and freight rates are therefore determined by the freight rate specific demand of market participants rather than by the actual supply and demand.(c) 2023 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Korean Association of Shipping and Logistics, Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creative-commons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 22
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Not All Oil Price Shocks Are Alike: Disentangling Demand and Supply Shocks in the Crude Oil Market
    Kilian, Lutz
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 99 (03): : 1053 - 1069
  • [32] The nonlinear dynamic process of macroeconomic development by modelling dry bulk shipping market
    Chang, Ching-Chih
    Lai, Tin-Chia
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2011, 18 (17) : 1655 - 1663
  • [33] Assessment of investment decision in the dry bulk shipping market based on real options thinking and the shipping cycle perspective
    Yin, Jingbo
    Wu, Yijie
    Lu, Linjun
    [J]. MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2019, 46 (03) : 330 - 343
  • [34] The Impacts of Supply and Demand Analysis on the Price of the Real Estate Market
    Ma, Haiying
    Li, Jiangqiao
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION, MANAGEMENT, INFORMATION AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING (EMIM 2017), 2017, 76 : 1885 - 1889
  • [35] The geographical foundations of dry bulk shipping
    Wang, Teng-Fei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2007, 15 (03) : 225 - 226
  • [36] Demand shocks and market manipulation
    Pinheiro, Marcelo
    [J]. ANNALS OF FINANCE, 2008, 4 (03) : 269 - 298
  • [37] The Effect of Fleet Size, Seaborne Volume on BDI Volatility in Dry Bulk Shipping Market
    Chen, Lifen
    Xie, Xinlian
    Wang, Wen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH, 2020, : 993 - 997
  • [38] Supply shocks, demand shocks and yield curve dynamics
    Casta, Martin
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 50
  • [39] DEMAND SHOCKS, SUPPLY SHOCKS AND THE CYCLICALITY OF REAL WAGES
    MOCAN, HN
    BAYTAS, A
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 1991, 23 (07) : 1213 - 1220
  • [40] An empirical model of the bulk shipping market
    Lun, Y. H. Venus
    Quaddus, Mohammed A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SHIPPING AND TRANSPORT LOGISTICS, 2009, 1 (01) : 37 - 54