The Outcome of Sacrocolpopexy/Sacrohysteropexy for Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Predictors of Anatomical Failure

被引:2
|
作者
Alsahabi, Jawaher A. [1 ,2 ]
Alsary, Saeed [1 ,2 ]
Abolfotouh, Mostafa A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Ben Abdu Aziz Univ Hlth Sci KSAU HS, Dept Urogynecol & Reconstruct Female Pelv Surg, King Abdul Aziz Med City, Minist Natl Guard Hlth Affairs, Riyadh 22490, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Saud Ben Abdul Aziz Univ Hlth Sci KSAU HS, King Abdullah Int Med Res Ctr KAIMRC, Minist Natl Guard Hlth Affairs, Riyadh 11481, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Saud bin Abdulaziz Univ Hlth Sci, King Abdullah Int Med Res Ctr, Riyadh Minist Natl Guard Hlth Affairs, POB 22490, Riyadh 11426, Saudi Arabia
来源
关键词
pelvic organ prolapse; Sacrocolpopexy; Sacrohysteropexy; laparoscopy; mesh complications; prolapse recurrence; surgical; failure; success rate; RISK-FACTORS; LAPAROSCOPIC SACROCOLPOPEXY; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.2147/IJWH.S413729
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a medical condition that profoundly impacts women's quality of life. Unfortunately, the literature lacks long-term predictors and risk factors for its recurrence. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of Sacrocolpopexy/Sacrohysteropexy and to identify the predictors of recurrence in a Saudi setting.Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, all patients who underwent Sacrocolpopexy (n=144) and Sacrohysteropexy (n=56) between 2009-2021 were followed up. Electronic medical records were examined to collect data on the following: Patient characteristics [age, parity, BMI, and past medical and surgical history], prolapse-related characteristics/symptoms, Surgery-related characteristics [type and approach of surgery, mesh type, and concomitant surgery], and Outcome characteristics. Postoperative anatomical success and failure rates were determined according to the Baden-Walker classification. Logistic regression analysis was applied to identify the predictors of overall anatomical failure of Sacrocolpopexy. Significance was considered at p<0.05.Results: Success rates of 96.8%, 99.4%, and 85.2% were detected in the anterior, apical, and posterior vaginal prolapse, respectively, with an overall success rate of 83.1%. The overall failure rate was 15.9%, with an incidence density of 5.98 per 100 women-years. The onset of failure in 27 failure cases ranged from 40 days to 11.5 years postoperative. After adjustment for the possible potential confounders, older age (OR=1.06, 95% CI:1.01-1.13, p=0.03) and the presence of diabetes (OR=4.93, 95% CI:1.33-18.33, p=0.02) were the only significant predictors of operation failure. As for complications, six cases (3.6%) required reoperation, two cases (1.2%) had a bowel obstruction two and seven years after surgery, and one patient (0.6%) had vaginal mesh exposure.Conclusion: The outcomes of Sacrocolpopexy/Sacrohysteropexy in our study are comparable to those in previous studies. Diabetes and elder age at the time of the surgery played a role in predicting recurrence. Sacrocolpopexy has a long-term profile of safety and efficacy. These findings could be key to stratifying surgical plans for pelvic organ prolapse cases.
引用
收藏
页码:1093 / 1105
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Variation of repeat sacrocolpopexy in women with recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
    Studer, A.
    Fahnle, I
    Christmann, C.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (SUPPL 1) : S122 - S122
  • [32] Optimism in women undergoing abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse
    Wren, Patricia A.
    Janz, Nancy K.
    FitzGerald, Mary P.
    Barber, Matthew D.
    Burgio, Kathryn L.
    Cundiff, Geoffrey W.
    Nygaard, Ingrid E.
    Zyczynski, Halina M.
    Gao, Xin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2008, 207 (02) : 240 - 245
  • [33] Combined rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy is safe for correction of pelvic organ prolapse
    Cristina B. Geltzeiler
    Elisa H. Birnbaum
    Matthew L. Silviera
    Matthew G. Mutch
    Joel Vetter
    Paul E. Wise
    Steven R. Hunt
    Sean C. Glasgow
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2018, 33 : 1453 - 1459
  • [34] Guidelines for Privileging and Credentialing Physicians for Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    不详
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 19 (02): : 62 - 65
  • [35] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: guidelines for clinical practice
    Wagner, L.
    Meurette, G.
    Vidart, A.
    Warembourg, S.
    Terassa, J-B
    Berrogain, N.
    Ragni, E.
    Le Normand, L.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2016, 26 : S27 - S37
  • [36] Modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with mesh for severe pelvic organ prolapse
    Zhu, Lan
    Sun, Zhixing
    Yu, Mei
    Li, Bin
    Li, Xiaochuan
    Lang, Jinghe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2013, 121 (02) : 170 - 172
  • [37] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse in the elderly: safety and outcomes
    Sato, Hirotaka
    Abe, Hirokazu
    Ikeda, Atsushi
    Miyagawa, Tomoaki
    Sato, Katsuhiko
    Tsukada, Sachiyuki
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 42 (01) : 110 - 115
  • [38] Combined rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy is safe for correction of pelvic organ prolapse
    Geltzeiler, Cristina B.
    Birnbaum, Elisa H.
    Silviera, Matthew L.
    Mutch, Matthew G.
    Vetter, Joel
    Wise, Paul E.
    Hunt, Steven R.
    Glasgow, Sean C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 33 (10) : 1453 - 1459
  • [39] A prospective study of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse
    North, C. E.
    Ali-Ross, N. S.
    Smith, A. R. B.
    Reid, F. M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2009, 116 (09) : 1251 - 1257
  • [40] Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Paravaginal Repair and Sacrocolpopexy in Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Kim, Woong Bin
    Lee, Sang Wook
    Lee, Kwang Woo
    Kim, Jun Mo
    Kim, Young Ho
    Chung, Soo-Ho
    Nam, Kyehyun
    UROLOGY, 2022, 164 : 151 - 156