The Outcome of Sacrocolpopexy/Sacrohysteropexy for Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Predictors of Anatomical Failure

被引:2
|
作者
Alsahabi, Jawaher A. [1 ,2 ]
Alsary, Saeed [1 ,2 ]
Abolfotouh, Mostafa A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Ben Abdu Aziz Univ Hlth Sci KSAU HS, Dept Urogynecol & Reconstruct Female Pelv Surg, King Abdul Aziz Med City, Minist Natl Guard Hlth Affairs, Riyadh 22490, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Saud Ben Abdul Aziz Univ Hlth Sci KSAU HS, King Abdullah Int Med Res Ctr KAIMRC, Minist Natl Guard Hlth Affairs, Riyadh 11481, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Saud bin Abdulaziz Univ Hlth Sci, King Abdullah Int Med Res Ctr, Riyadh Minist Natl Guard Hlth Affairs, POB 22490, Riyadh 11426, Saudi Arabia
来源
关键词
pelvic organ prolapse; Sacrocolpopexy; Sacrohysteropexy; laparoscopy; mesh complications; prolapse recurrence; surgical; failure; success rate; RISK-FACTORS; LAPAROSCOPIC SACROCOLPOPEXY; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.2147/IJWH.S413729
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a medical condition that profoundly impacts women's quality of life. Unfortunately, the literature lacks long-term predictors and risk factors for its recurrence. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of Sacrocolpopexy/Sacrohysteropexy and to identify the predictors of recurrence in a Saudi setting.Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, all patients who underwent Sacrocolpopexy (n=144) and Sacrohysteropexy (n=56) between 2009-2021 were followed up. Electronic medical records were examined to collect data on the following: Patient characteristics [age, parity, BMI, and past medical and surgical history], prolapse-related characteristics/symptoms, Surgery-related characteristics [type and approach of surgery, mesh type, and concomitant surgery], and Outcome characteristics. Postoperative anatomical success and failure rates were determined according to the Baden-Walker classification. Logistic regression analysis was applied to identify the predictors of overall anatomical failure of Sacrocolpopexy. Significance was considered at p<0.05.Results: Success rates of 96.8%, 99.4%, and 85.2% were detected in the anterior, apical, and posterior vaginal prolapse, respectively, with an overall success rate of 83.1%. The overall failure rate was 15.9%, with an incidence density of 5.98 per 100 women-years. The onset of failure in 27 failure cases ranged from 40 days to 11.5 years postoperative. After adjustment for the possible potential confounders, older age (OR=1.06, 95% CI:1.01-1.13, p=0.03) and the presence of diabetes (OR=4.93, 95% CI:1.33-18.33, p=0.02) were the only significant predictors of operation failure. As for complications, six cases (3.6%) required reoperation, two cases (1.2%) had a bowel obstruction two and seven years after surgery, and one patient (0.6%) had vaginal mesh exposure.Conclusion: The outcomes of Sacrocolpopexy/Sacrohysteropexy in our study are comparable to those in previous studies. Diabetes and elder age at the time of the surgery played a role in predicting recurrence. Sacrocolpopexy has a long-term profile of safety and efficacy. These findings could be key to stratifying surgical plans for pelvic organ prolapse cases.
引用
收藏
页码:1093 / 1105
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with anterior and posterior polypropylene mesh in multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse
    Nomura, J.
    Moriyama, S.
    Huang, T.
    Tokiwa, S.
    Sawada, Y.
    Hayashi, T.
    Shimizu, Y.
    Gonocruz, G.
    Meutia, A.
    Rathih, K.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 29 : S211 - S211
  • [22] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus pelvic organ prolapse suspension for surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective study
    Tagliaferri, Valeria
    Taccaliti, Chiara
    Romano, Federico
    D'Asta, Marco
    Martulli, Bruno
    Gentile, Cosimo
    Legge, Francesco
    Ruggieri, Stefania
    Guido, Maurizio
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 42 (06) : 2075 - 2081
  • [23] Predictors for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Recurrence After Sacrocolpopexy: A Matched Case-Control Study
    Chang, Olivia H.
    Davidson, Emily R. W.
    Thomas, Tonya N.
    Paraiso, Marie Fidela R.
    Ferrando, Cecile A.
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 27 (01): : E165 - E170
  • [24] Complications and clinical outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse
    Sato, Hirotaka
    Abe, Hirokazu
    Ikeda, Atsushi
    Miyagawa, Tomoaki
    Sato, Katsuhiko
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 41 (01) : 128 - 132
  • [25] ROBOTIC SACROCOLPOPEXY WITH VENTRAL RECTOPEXY FOR MULTICOMPARTMENT PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE
    Stewart, Carrie
    Moradzadeh, Ariel
    Moore, Beth
    Anger, Jennifer
    Eilber, Karyn
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E1207 - E1207
  • [26] Sexual function before and after sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse
    Handa, Victoria L.
    Zyczynski, Halina M.
    Brubaker, Linda
    Nygaard, Ingrid
    Janz, Nancy K.
    Richter, Holly E.
    Wren, Patricia A.
    Brown, Morton B.
    Weber, Anne M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (06) : 629.e1 - 629.e6
  • [27] Ureterohydronephrosis and Renal Failure in Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Marcu, Dragos
    Manea, Maria
    Spinu, Dan
    Anghel, Radu
    Bohiltea, Roxana
    Balanescu, Andra
    Berceanu, Costin
    Socea, Bogdan
    Crisan, Nicolae
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 35TH BALKAN MEDICAL WEEK, 2018, : 500 - 507
  • [28] Robotic sacrocolpopexy in pelvic organ prolapse: a review of current literature
    Pushkar, Dmitry Y.
    Kasyan, George R.
    Popov, Alexander A.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2021, 31 (06) : 531 - 536
  • [29] COMBINED RECTOPEXY AND SACROCOLPOPEXY IS SAFE FOR CORRECTION OF PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE
    Geltzeiler, C.
    Silviera, M.
    Vetter, J.
    Mutch, M.
    Wise, P.
    Hunt, S.
    Birnbaum, E.
    Glasgow, S.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2017, 60 (06) : E277 - E278
  • [30] Current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse
    Gonzalez-Enguita, Carmen
    Gennaro-DellaRossa, Natalia
    Lopez-Lopez, Esther
    Escobar-Castano, Juliana
    Miguel Rodriguez-Castro, Percy
    Gonzalez-Lopez, Raquel
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2017, 70 (04): : 400 - 411