Impact of primary care usual provider type and provider interdependence on outcomes for patients with diabetes: a cohort study

被引:1
|
作者
Everett, Christine [1 ,2 ]
Christy, Jacob [3 ]
Batchelder, Heather [3 ]
Morgan, Perri A. [2 ,3 ]
Docherty, Sharron [4 ]
Smith, Valerie A. [2 ,5 ,6 ]
Anderson, John B. [3 ,7 ]
Viera, Anthony [2 ,3 ]
Jackson, George L. [2 ,5 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Med, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Populat Hlth Sci, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Family Med & Community Hlth, Durham, NC USA
[4] Duke Univ, Sch Nursing, Durham, NC USA
[5] Durham Vet Affairs Hlth Care Syst, Ctr Innovat Accelerate Discovery & Practice Transf, Durham, NC USA
[6] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Durham, NC USA
[7] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Duke Primary Care, Durham, NC USA
[8] Uniters Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Petter ODonnel Jr Sch Publ Hlth, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
DIABETES MELLITUS; Teams; PRIMARY CARE; INTERPERSONAL CONTINUITY; PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS; NURSE-PRACTITIONERS; CHRONIC DISEASES; MEDICAL HOME; TEAMS; HEALTH; IMPROVE; TIME;
D O I
10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002229
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundInterprofessional primary care (PC) teams are key to the provision of high-quality care. PC providers often 'share' patients (eg, a patient may see multiple providers in the same clinic), resulting in between-visit interdependence between providers. However, concern remains that PC provider interdependence will reduce quality of care, causing some organisations to hesitate in creating multiple provider teams. If PC provider teams are formalised, the PC usual provider of care (UPC) type (physician, nurse practitioner (NP) or physician assistant/associate (PA)) should be determined for patients with varying levels of medical complexity. ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of PC provider interdependence, UPC type and patient complexity on diabetes-specific outcomes for adult patients with diabetes. DesignCohort study using electronic health record data from 26 PC practices in central North Carolina, USA. ParticipantsAdult patients with diabetes (N=10 498) who received PC in 2016 and 2017. OutcomeTesting for diabetes control, testing for lipid levels, mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) values and mean low-density lipoprotein (LDL) values in 2017. ResultsReceipt of guideline recommended testing was high (72% for HbA1c and 66% for LDL testing), HbA1c values were 7.5% and LDL values were 88.5 mg/dL. When controlling for a range of patient and panel level variables, increases in PC provider interdependence were not significantly associated with diabetes-specific outcomes. Similarly, there were no significant differences in the diabetes outcomes for patients with NP/PA UPCs when compared with physicians. The number and type of a patient's chronic conditions did impact the receipt of testing, but not average values for HbA1c and LDL. ConclusionsA range of UPC types on PC multiple provider teams can deliver guideline-recommended diabetes care. However, the number and type of a patient's chronic conditions alone impacted the receipt of testing, but not average values for HbA1c and LDL.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The patient-provider relationship and adherence to treatment in patients with diabetes in primary care
    Ciechanowski, P
    Katon, W
    Russo, J
    Walker, E
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY IN MEDICINE, 1999, 29 (04): : 378 - 379
  • [22] Factors Associated With Intensification of Oral Diabetes Medications in Primary Care Provider-Patient Dyads: A Cohort Study
    Bolen, Shari Danielle
    Bricker, Eric
    Samuels, T. Alafia
    Yeh, Hsin-Chieh
    Marinopoulos, Spyridon S.
    McGuire, Maura
    Abuid, Marcela
    Brancati, Frederick L.
    DIABETES CARE, 2009, 32 (01) : 25 - 31
  • [23] Pediatric quality of care is associated with primary care provider type
    Brousseau, DC
    Hoffmann, RG
    Yauck, JS
    Flores, G
    Nattinger, AB
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2004, 55 (04) : 230A - 231A
  • [24] PRIMARY CARE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INTEGRATION: IMPROVING PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER OUTCOMES?
    Hoffman, Liza
    Burley, Jillian
    Benedetto, Emily
    Joseph, Robert
    O'Brien, Collen
    Grossman, Ellie
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 32 : S788 - S789
  • [25] Do HIV Care Outcomes Differ by Provider Type?
    Weiser, John
    Tie, Yunfeng
    Crim, Stacy M.
    Riedel, David J.
    Shouse, R. Luke
    Dasgupta, Sharoda
    JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2024, 96 (02) : 180 - 189
  • [26] Provider Type and Management of Common Visits in Primary Care
    Roblin, Douglas W.
    Liu, Hangsheng
    Cromwell, Lee F.
    Robbins, Michael
    Robinson, Brandi E.
    Auerbach, David
    Mehrotra, Ateev
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2017, 23 (04): : 225 - +
  • [27] Provider Responses to Patients Controlling Access to their Electronic Health Records: A Prospective Cohort Study in Primary Care
    Tierney, William M.
    Alpert, Sheri A.
    Byrket, Amy
    Caine, Kelly
    Leventhal, Jeremy C.
    Meslin, Eric M.
    Schwartz, Peter H.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 30 : S31 - S37
  • [28] Provider Responses to Patients Controlling Access to their Electronic Health Records: A Prospective Cohort Study in Primary Care
    William M. Tierney
    Sheri A. Alpert
    Amy Byrket
    Kelly Caine
    Jeremy C. Leventhal
    Eric M. Meslin
    Peter H. Schwartz
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2015, 30 : 31 - 37
  • [29] Primary health care provider-focused interventions for improving outcomes for people with type 2 diabetes: a rapid review
    Faruqi, Nighat
    Thomas, Louise
    Parker, Sharon
    Harris-Roxas, Ben
    Taggart, Jane
    Spooner, Catherine
    Wong, Vincent
    Harris, Mark F.
    PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2019, 29 (04):
  • [30] Provider error is an important cause of poor outcomes in diabetes care
    Hellman, R
    Hellman, J
    Rosen, H
    DIABETES, 1999, 48 : A67 - A67