Structural Modeling and Measuring Impact of Active Learning Methods in Engineering Education

被引:3
|
作者
Guimaraes, Leovani Marcial [1 ]
Lima, Renato da Silva [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Telecommun, Teaching & Res Dept, BR-37500903 Itajuba, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Itajuba, Teaching & Res Dept, BR-37500903 Itajuba, Brazil
关键词
Protocols; Mathematical models; Adaptation models; Training; Systematics; Particle measurements; Atmospheric measurements; Active learning (AL); classroom observation protocol; engineering education (EE); partial least-squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM); PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES; PLS-SEM; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1109/TE.2023.3259882
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Contribution: This article presents a novel approach that demonstrates how students' learning can be improved by increasing classroom adherence to active learning (AL) application, in a typical engineering education (EE) environment. It does that by using classroom observation protocol data and student assessment grades analyzed by a statistical tool, representing seven engineering programs. Background: AL applications in EE have been growing in recent years and there have been relevant discussions about their effect on students learning. This research is grounded on a 2.5-year-long data collection process through objective measures, following a strict experimental design project. It differs from other studies where surveys are used for data collection. Research Question: Can differences in students' learning between traditional teaching and AL methods be distinguished by means of classroom observation protocol measures coupled with partial least-square structural equation modeling? Methodology: An experimental research design was conducted in an Engineering Higher Education Institution, by taking independent measures of latent constructs' indicators, such as student grades and AL classroom adherence levels. The data were subject to a partial least-squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) approach for modeling, analysis, and validation. Findings: The results suggested a nonlinear positive cause-and-effect relationship between AL adherence and learning, validated by several performance indexes, such as a learning prediction relevance Q(2) predict = 0.453 and goodness of fit = 0.588. The model demonstrated a learning score improvement from 45.89 to 74.90 as an effect of the adherence to AL score increase from 0 to 35.97.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 552
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment and Evaluation in Active Learning Implementations: Introducing the Engineering Education Active Learning Maturity Model
    Arruda, Humberto
    Silva, Edison Renato
    EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2021, 11 (11):
  • [32] IMPACT OF DIFFERENT ACTIVE METHODOLOGIES ON THE LEARNING OF STUDENTS IN ENGINEERING
    Sergio Artal, J.
    Manuel Artacho, J.
    Romero Pascual, E.
    INTED2016: 10TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2016, : 3611 - 3620
  • [33] Engineering Education in the Age of AI: Analysis of the Impact of Chatbots on Learning in Engineering
    Bravo, Flor A.
    Cruz-Bohorquez, Juan M.
    EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2024, 14 (05):
  • [34] Active Learning Methods and Technology: Strategies for Design Education
    Coorey, Jillian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ART & DESIGN EDUCATION, 2016, 35 (03) : 337 - 347
  • [35] PROSPECTS FOR THE APPLICATION OF ACTIVE LEARNING METHODS IN MODERN EDUCATION
    Verdiyeva, Tunzala
    REVISTA ON LINE DE POLITICA E GESTAO EDUCACIONAL, 2021, 25 : 1712 - 1726
  • [36] Measuring Learning Gains in Chemical Education: A Comparison of Two Methods
    Pentecost, Thomas C.
    Barbera, Jack
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2013, 90 (07) : 839 - 845
  • [37] The Impact of Learning Activities on the Final Grade in Engineering Education
    Ramirez-Velarde, Raul
    Alexandrov, Nia
    Sanhueza-Olave, Miguel
    Perez-Cazares, Raul
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE 2016 (ICCS 2016), 2016, 80 : 1812 - 1821
  • [38] Response spectrum devices for active learning in earthquake engineering education
    Slocum, Richard K.
    Adams, Rachel K.
    Buker, Kamilah
    Hurwitz, David S.
    Mason, H. Benjamin
    Parrish, Christopher E.
    Scott, Michael H.
    HARDWAREX, 2018, 4 (04):
  • [39] Fostering Digital Literacy through Active Learning in Engineering Education
    Caratozzolo, Patricia
    Alvarez-Delgado, Alvaro
    Sirkis, Gabriela
    2021 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE 2021), 2021,
  • [40] Active Learning based Laboratory towards Engineering Education 4.0
    Delgado Prieto, Miguel
    Fernandez Sobrino, Angel
    Ruiz Soto, Lucia
    Romero, David
    Fibla Biosca, Pere
    Romeral Martinez, Luis
    2019 24TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES AND FACTORY AUTOMATION (ETFA), 2019, : 776 - 783