Comparison of the accuracy of dental implant placement using dynamic and augmented reality-based dynamic navigation: An in vitro study

被引:9
|
作者
Tao, Baoxin [1 ,2 ]
Fan, Xingqi [3 ]
Wang, Feng [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Xiaojun [3 ,5 ]
Shen, Yihan [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Wu, Yiqun [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Dept Dent Ctr 2, Sch Med,Coll Stomatol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Res Inst Stomatol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Natl Ctr Stomatol, Shanghai Key Lab Stomatol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Inst Biomed Mfg & Life Qual Engn, Sch Mech Engn, State Key Lab Mech Syst & Vibrat, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Sch Med, Coll Stomatol,Dept Dent Ctr 2, 280 Mohe Rd, Shanghai 201999, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Dongchuan Rd 800, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
关键词
Surgery; Computer-assisted; Augmented reality; Dental implants; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jds.2023.05.006
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: Augmented reality has been gradually applied in dental implant surgery. However, whether the dynamic navigation system integrated with augmented reality technology will further improve the accuracy is still unknown. The purpose of this study is to investigate the accuracy of dental implant placement using dynamic navigation and augmented reality-based dynamic navigation systems. Materials and methods: Thirty-two cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans from clinical patients were collected and used to generate 64 phantoms that were allocated to the augmented reality based dynamic navigation (ARDN) group or the conventional dynamic navigation (DN) group. The primary outcomes were global coronal, apical and angular deviations, and they were measured after image fusion. A linear mixed model with a random intercept was used. A P value < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Results: A total of 242 dental implants were placed in two groups. The global coronal, apical and angular deviations of the ARDN and DN groups were 1.31 +/- 0.67 mm vs. 1.18 +/- 0.59 mm, 1.36 +/- 0.67 mm vs. 1.39 +/- 0.55 mm, and 3.72 +/- 2.13(degrees) vs. 3.1 +/- 1.56(degrees), respectively. No significant differences were found with regard to coronal and apical deviations (P = 0.16 and 0.6, respectively), but the DN group had a significantly lower angular deviation than the ARDN group (P = 0.02). Conclusion: The augmented reality-based dynamic navigation system yielded a similar accuracy to the conventional dynamic navigation system for dental implant placement in coronal and apical points, but the augmented reality-based dynamic navigation system yielded a higher angular deviation. 2023 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 202
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reliability and accuracy of dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement
    Wu, Yiqun
    Tao, Baoxin
    Lan, Kengliang
    Shen, Yihan
    Huang, Wei
    Wang, Feng
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2022, 33 (04) : 362 - 376
  • [32] Learning Curve and Comparison of Dynamic Implant Placement Accuracy Using a Navigation System in Young Professionals
    Spille, Johannes
    Helmstetter, Eva
    Kuebel, Paul
    Weitkamp, Jan-Tobias
    Wagner, Juliane
    Wieker, Henning
    Naujokat, Hendrik
    Floerke, Christian
    Wiltfang, Joerg
    Guelses, Aydin
    DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2022, 10 (10)
  • [33] Accuracy of 3 calibration methods of computer-assisted dynamic navigation for implant placement: An in vitro study
    Pei, Xiyan
    Liu, Xiaoqiang
    Iao, Siniong
    Ma, Feifei
    Li, Hong
    Sun, Feng
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 131 (04): : 668 - 674
  • [34] Accuracy of different registration areas using active and passive dynamic navigation systems in dental implant surgery: An in vitro study
    Wu, Bin-Zhang
    Ma, Fei-Fei
    Yan, Xiao-Yan
    Sun, Feng
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024, 35 (08) : 888 - 897
  • [35] Accuracy of a Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation System in the Placement of Zygomatic Dental Implants: An In Vitro Study
    Gonzalez Rueda, Juan Ramon
    Garcia Avila, Irene
    de Paz Hermoso, Victor Manuel
    Riad Deglow, Elena
    Zubizarreta-Macho, Alvaro
    Pato Mourelo, Jesus
    Montero Martin, Javier
    Hernandez Montero, Sofia
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (05)
  • [36] Three-dimensional Accuracy of Angled Dental Implant Placement: A Comparison Study of the Dynamic Navigation System and Free-hand Method
    Ustek, Gunes Kenan
    Simsek, Hasan Onur
    MEANDROS MEDICAL AND DENTAL JOURNAL, 2021, 22 : 119 - 128
  • [37] Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice
    Stefanelli, Luigi, V
    DeGroot, Bradley S.
    Lipton, David, I
    Mandelaris, George A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2019, 34 (01) : 205 - 213
  • [38] Impact of Surgeons' Experience on Implant Placement Accuracy Using a Dynamic Navigation System: A Cadaver Pilot Study
    Pera, Francesco
    Vocaturo, Camillo
    Crupi, Armando
    Longhi, Beatrice
    Campagna, Alessandro
    Fiorino, Antonino
    Gibello, Umberto
    Roccuzzo, Andrea
    PROSTHESIS, 2025, 7 (01):
  • [39] Accuracy of a Novel Robot-Assisted System and Dynamic Navigation System for Dental Implant Placement: A Clinical Retrospective Study
    Chen, Jianping
    Ding, Yude
    Cao, Ruijue
    Zheng, Yuchen
    Shen, Liheng
    Wang, Linhong
    Yang, Fan
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2025,
  • [40] A Comparative Prospective Study on the Accuracy and Efficiency of Autonomous Robotic System Versus Dynamic Navigation System in Dental Implant Placement
    Yu, Muqiao
    Luo, Yilin
    Li, Bolin
    Xu, Lingqiao
    Yang, Xingmei
    Man, Yi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2025, 52 (02) : 280 - 288