Publication Bias and Selective Outcome Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials Related to Rehabilitation: A Literature Review

被引:3
|
作者
Komukai, Kanako [1 ]
Sugita, Sho [2 ]
Fujimoto, Shuhei [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shizuoka Grad Univ Publ Hlth, Dept Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Shizuoka, Japan
[2] Luxem Co Ltd, Kawasaki, Japan
[3] Shizuoka Grad Univ Publ Hlth, Kita Ando 4-27-2,Aoi Ku, Shizuoka 4200881, Japan
来源
关键词
Evidence-based medicine; Decision making; Publication bias; Rehabilitation; Reporting bias; PUBLISHED PRIMARY OUTCOMES; CLINICAL-TRIALS; EXPLANATION; GUIDELINES; INTERVENTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2023.06.006
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the rate of registered protocols published as research papers as a measure of publication bias, and the concordance rates of the primary outcomes between research protocol and published papers as a measure of selective outcome reporting bias in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to rehabilitation. Data Sources: Protocols related to RCTs were extracted from electronic databases, the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN), International Standard Research Clinical Trial Number (ISRCTN), ClinicalTrials.gov, and MEDLINE. Published papers were retrieved from MEDLINE. Study Selection: The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) initial registration (UMIN, ISRCTN, ClinicalTrials.gov) within the designated period; (2) published as a paper from a research protocol in MEDLINE (PubMed); and (3) written in English or Japanese. The search period was from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2020. Data Extraction: The outcome of this study was set as the rate of published papers that were consistent with the extracted research protocol and the concordance rate between the primary outcomes in published papers and in protocols. The concordance rate of the primary outcomes was evaluated by checking whether the description in the research protocol matched that in the paper's abstract and main text. Data Synthesis: Out of the 5597 research protocols registered, only 727 were published (13.0%). The concordance rates of the primary outcomes were 48.7% and 72.6% in the abstract and main text, respectively. Conclusions: This study revealed major discrepancies between the number of research protocols and published papers, and difference of description regarding the primary outcomes in published papers which were already defined in the research protocols. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2024;105:150-6 (c) 2023 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 156
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] In reply: A two-stage review process for randomized controlled trials: the ultimate solution for publication bias?
    Philip M. Jones
    [J]. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2016, 63 : 1383 - 1383
  • [32] In reply: A two-stage review process for randomized controlled trials: the ultimate solution for publication bias?
    Jones, Philip M.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2016, 63 (12): : 1383 - 1383
  • [33] Inconsistent Outcome Reporting in Heart Failure Randomized Controlled Trials
    Siddiqi, Tariq Jamal
    Shahid, Izza
    Arshad, Muhammad Sameer
    Greene, Stephen J.
    Pandey, Ambarish
    Vaduganathan, Muthiah
    Spall, Harriette G. c. Van
    Mentz, Robert J.
    Khan, Shahzeb
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2023, 29 (04) : 425 - 433
  • [34] Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias Agomelatine as a Case Example
    Howland, Robert H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL NURSING AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES, 2011, 49 (09) : 11 - 14
  • [35] Standards for reporting randomized controlled trials in neurosurgery A review
    Kiehna, Erin N.
    Starke, Robert M.
    Pouratian, Nader
    Dumont, Aaron S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 114 (02) : 280 - 285
  • [36] Catalogue of bias: selective outcome reporting bias
    Thomas, Elizabeth T.
    Heneghan, Carl
    [J]. BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2022, 27 (06) : 370 - 372
  • [37] Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general endocrinology literature
    Rios, Lorena P.
    Odueyungbo, Adefowope
    Moitri, Misha O.
    Rahman, Mohammed O.
    Thabane, Lehana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2008, 93 (10): : 3810 - 3816
  • [38] Reporting of Harm in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in the Urological Literature
    Breau, Rodney H.
    Gaboury, Isabelle
    Scales, Charles D., Jr.
    Fesperman, Susan F.
    Watterson, James D.
    Dahm, Philipp
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (05): : 1693 - 1697
  • [39] Outcome reporting bias in clinical trials
    Esposito, Eleonora
    Cipriani, Andrea
    Barbui, Corrado
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGIA E PSICHIATRIA SOCIALE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRIC SCIENCES, 2009, 18 (01): : 17 - 18
  • [40] Revisiting the Quality of Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Nursing Literature
    Adams, Yenupini Joyce
    Kamp, Kendra
    Liu, Cheng Ching
    Stommel, Manfred
    Thana, Kanjana
    Broome, Marion E.
    Smith, Barbara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2018, 50 (02) : 200 - 209