Publication Bias and Selective Outcome Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials Related to Rehabilitation: A Literature Review

被引:3
|
作者
Komukai, Kanako [1 ]
Sugita, Sho [2 ]
Fujimoto, Shuhei [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shizuoka Grad Univ Publ Hlth, Dept Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Shizuoka, Japan
[2] Luxem Co Ltd, Kawasaki, Japan
[3] Shizuoka Grad Univ Publ Hlth, Kita Ando 4-27-2,Aoi Ku, Shizuoka 4200881, Japan
来源
关键词
Evidence-based medicine; Decision making; Publication bias; Rehabilitation; Reporting bias; PUBLISHED PRIMARY OUTCOMES; CLINICAL-TRIALS; EXPLANATION; GUIDELINES; INTERVENTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2023.06.006
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the rate of registered protocols published as research papers as a measure of publication bias, and the concordance rates of the primary outcomes between research protocol and published papers as a measure of selective outcome reporting bias in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to rehabilitation. Data Sources: Protocols related to RCTs were extracted from electronic databases, the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN), International Standard Research Clinical Trial Number (ISRCTN), ClinicalTrials.gov, and MEDLINE. Published papers were retrieved from MEDLINE. Study Selection: The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) initial registration (UMIN, ISRCTN, ClinicalTrials.gov) within the designated period; (2) published as a paper from a research protocol in MEDLINE (PubMed); and (3) written in English or Japanese. The search period was from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2020. Data Extraction: The outcome of this study was set as the rate of published papers that were consistent with the extracted research protocol and the concordance rate between the primary outcomes in published papers and in protocols. The concordance rate of the primary outcomes was evaluated by checking whether the description in the research protocol matched that in the paper's abstract and main text. Data Synthesis: Out of the 5597 research protocols registered, only 727 were published (13.0%). The concordance rates of the primary outcomes were 48.7% and 72.6% in the abstract and main text, respectively. Conclusions: This study revealed major discrepancies between the number of research protocols and published papers, and difference of description regarding the primary outcomes in published papers which were already defined in the research protocols. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2024;105:150-6 (c) 2023 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 156
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quality of reporting on randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for stroke rehabilitation
    Zhuang, Lixing
    He, Jun
    Zhuang, Xun
    Lu, Liming
    [J]. BMC COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 14
  • [22] Quality of reporting on randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for stroke rehabilitation
    Lixing Zhuang
    Jun He
    Xun Zhuang
    Liming Lu
    [J]. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 14
  • [23] Outcome assessment in randomized controlled trials of stroke rehabilitation
    Salter, Katherine L.
    Teasell, Robert W.
    Foley, Norine C.
    Jutai, Jeffrey W.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2007, 86 (12) : 1007 - 1012
  • [24] Assessment of publication bias and registration of randomized controlled trials published in anesthesia
    Bonnot, B.
    Yavchitz, A.
    Paugam-Burtz, C.
    [J]. ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION, 2014, 33 : A81 - A81
  • [25] Outcome reporting in randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of gastroschisis treatment: a systematic review
    Ross, Andrew R.
    Hall, Nigel J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2016, 51 (08) : 1385 - 1389
  • [26] Outcome Reporting in Randomized Trials for Shoulder Disorders: Literature Review to Inform the Development of a Core Outcome Set
    Page, Matthew J.
    Huang, Hsiaomin
    Verhagen, Arianne P.
    Gagnier, Joel J.
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    [J]. ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2018, 70 (02) : 252 - 259
  • [27] Assessment of publication trends of systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials of rehabilitation
    Taito, Shunsuke
    Kataoka, Yuki
    [J]. ANNALS OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2021, 64 (01)
  • [28] Selective outcome reporting in randomized clinical trials of dental implants
    Sendyk, Daniel Isaac
    Rovai, Emanuel Silva
    Souza, Nathalia Vilela
    Zindel Deboni, Maria Cristina
    Pannuti, Claudio Mendes
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2019, 46 (07) : 758 - 765
  • [29] Selective outcome reporting in root coverage randomized clinical trials
    Sendyk, Daniel Isaac
    Souza, Nathalia Vilela
    Cesar Neto, Joao Batista
    Tatakis, Dimitris N.
    Pannuti, Claudio Mendes
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2021, 48 (06) : 867 - 877
  • [30] Consistency in the analysis and reporting of PEPs in oncology randomized controlled trials from registration to publication: a systematic review
    Boespflug, Amelie
    Gan, Hui
    Chen, Eric X.
    Pond, Gregory
    You, Benoit
    [J]. BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2012, 99 (10) : 943 - 952