Publication Bias and Selective Outcome Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials Related to Rehabilitation: A Literature Review

被引:3
|
作者
Komukai, Kanako [1 ]
Sugita, Sho [2 ]
Fujimoto, Shuhei [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shizuoka Grad Univ Publ Hlth, Dept Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Shizuoka, Japan
[2] Luxem Co Ltd, Kawasaki, Japan
[3] Shizuoka Grad Univ Publ Hlth, Kita Ando 4-27-2,Aoi Ku, Shizuoka 4200881, Japan
来源
关键词
Evidence-based medicine; Decision making; Publication bias; Rehabilitation; Reporting bias; PUBLISHED PRIMARY OUTCOMES; CLINICAL-TRIALS; EXPLANATION; GUIDELINES; INTERVENTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2023.06.006
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the rate of registered protocols published as research papers as a measure of publication bias, and the concordance rates of the primary outcomes between research protocol and published papers as a measure of selective outcome reporting bias in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to rehabilitation. Data Sources: Protocols related to RCTs were extracted from electronic databases, the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN), International Standard Research Clinical Trial Number (ISRCTN), ClinicalTrials.gov, and MEDLINE. Published papers were retrieved from MEDLINE. Study Selection: The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) initial registration (UMIN, ISRCTN, ClinicalTrials.gov) within the designated period; (2) published as a paper from a research protocol in MEDLINE (PubMed); and (3) written in English or Japanese. The search period was from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2020. Data Extraction: The outcome of this study was set as the rate of published papers that were consistent with the extracted research protocol and the concordance rate between the primary outcomes in published papers and in protocols. The concordance rate of the primary outcomes was evaluated by checking whether the description in the research protocol matched that in the paper's abstract and main text. Data Synthesis: Out of the 5597 research protocols registered, only 727 were published (13.0%). The concordance rates of the primary outcomes were 48.7% and 72.6% in the abstract and main text, respectively. Conclusions: This study revealed major discrepancies between the number of research protocols and published papers, and difference of description regarding the primary outcomes in published papers which were already defined in the research protocols. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2024;105:150-6 (c) 2023 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 156
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Selective outcome reporting across psychopharmacotherapy randomized controlled trials
    Lancee, Michelle
    Schuring, Marleen
    Tijdink, Joeri K.
    Chan, An-Wen
    Vinkers, Christiaan H.
    Luykx, Jurjen J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (01)
  • [2] A systematic review of trial registration and selective outcome reporting in psychotherapy randomized controlled trials
    Bradley, H. A.
    Rucklidge, J. J.
    Mulder, R. T.
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2017, 135 (01) : 65 - 77
  • [3] Tools to Assess the Risk of Bias and Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in Rehabilitation
    Armijo-Olivo, Susan
    Patrini, Michele
    de Oliveira-Souza, Ana Izabela S.
    Dennett, Liz
    Arienti, Chiara
    Dahchi, Mustafa
    Negrini, Stefano
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 102 (08): : 1606 - 1613
  • [4] Selective outcome reporting and sponsorship in randomized controlled trials in IVF and ICSI
    Braakhekke, M.
    Scholten, I.
    Mol, F.
    Limpens, J.
    Mol, B. W.
    van der Veen, F.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 (10) : 2117 - 2122
  • [5] Prospective Registration and Outcome-Reporting Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Eczema Treatments: A Systematic Review
    Nankervis, Helen
    Baibergenova, Akerke
    Williams, Hywel C.
    Thomas, Kim S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2012, 132 (12) : 2727 - 2734
  • [6] Outcome reporting bias in randomized-controlled trials investigating antipsychotic drugs
    M Lancee
    C M C Lemmens
    R S Kahn
    C H Vinkers
    J J Luykx
    [J]. Translational Psychiatry, 2017, 7 : e1232 - e1232
  • [7] Bias in the analysis and reporting of randomized controlled trials
    Stewart, LA
    Parmar, MKB
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 1996, 12 (02) : 264 - 275
  • [8] Outcome reporting bias in randomized-controlled trials investigating antipsychotic drugs
    Lancee, M.
    Lemmens, C. M. C.
    Kahn, R. S.
    Vinkers, C. H.
    Luykx, J. J.
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 7 : e1232 - e1232
  • [9] Criteria to Evaluate the Quality of Outcome Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials of Rehabilitation Interventions
    Wang, Dan
    Taylor-Vaisey, Anne
    Negrini, Stefano
    Cote, Pierre
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2021, 100 (01) : 17 - 28
  • [10] Publication bias of randomized controlled trials in emergency medicine
    Ospina, MB
    Kelly, K
    Klassen, TP
    Rowe, BH
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 13 (01) : 102 - 108