Most-likely DCF Estimates of Magnetic Field Strength

被引:3
|
作者
Myers, Philip C. [1 ]
Stephens, Ian W. [2 ]
Coude, Simon [2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard & Smithsonian, Ctr Astrophys, 60 Garden St, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Worcester State Univ, Dept Earth Environm & Phys, Worcester, MA 01602 USA
来源
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL | 2024年 / 962卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
DISPERSION; CLOUD; STATISTICS; VELOCITY;
D O I
10.3847/1538-4357/ad1596
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The Davis-Chandrasekhar-Fermi (DCF) method is widely used to evaluate magnetic fields in star-forming regions. Yet it remains unclear how well DCF equations estimate the mean plane-of-the-sky field strength in a map region. To address this question, five DCF equations are applied to an idealized cloud map. Its polarization angles have a normal distribution with dispersion sigma(theta), and its density and velocity dispersion have negligible variation. Each DCF equation specifies a global field strength B-DCF and a distribution of local DCF estimates. The "most-likely" DCF field strength B-ml is the distribution mode, for which a correction factor beta(ml) equivalent to B-ml/B-DCF is calculated analytically. For each equation, beta(ml) < 1, indicating that B-DCF is a biased estimator of B-ml. The values of beta(ml) are beta(ml) approximate to 0.7 when B-DCF proportional to sigma(-1)(theta) due to turbulent excitation of Alfv & eacute;nic MHD waves, and beta(ml) approximate to 0.9 when B-DCF proportional to sigma(-1/2)(theta) due to non-Alfv & eacute;nic MHD waves. These statistical correction factors beta(ml) have partial agreement with correction factors beta sim obtained from MHD simulations. The relative importance of the statistical correction is estimated by assuming that each simulation correction has both a statistical and a physical component. Then the standard, structure function, and original DCF equations appear most accurate because they require the least physical correction. Their relative physical correction factors are 0.1, 0.3, and 0.4 on a scale from 0 to 1. In contrast, the large-angle and parallel-delta B equations have physical correction factors 0.6 and 0.7. These results may be useful in selecting DCF equations, within model limitations.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] MAGNETIC DIODE FOR MEASUREMENT OF MAGNETIC-FIELD STRENGTH.
    Fedotov, S.I.
    Zalkind, V.M.
    Instruments and experimental techniques New York, 1987, 30 (4 pt 2): : 928 - 930
  • [42] Probing the magnetic field strength dependence of the chiral magnetic effect
    Panos Christakoglou
    The European Physical Journal C, 84
  • [43] MEASUREMENT OF MAGNETIC POTENTIAL AND MAGNETIC FIELD STRENGTH BY COMPENSATING METHOD
    KAULFERSCH, H
    ARCHIV FUR TECHNISCHES MESSEN UND MESSTECHNISCHE PRAXIS, 1969, (401): : 127 - +
  • [44] A MAGNETIC FIELD STRENGTH METER USING THE PROTON MAGNETIC MOMENT
    HOPKINS, NJ
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1949, 20 (06): : 401 - 402
  • [45] Effect of Magnetic Field Strength on a Magnetic Thrust Chamber System
    Maeno, Akihiro
    Hinaga, Tomoyuki
    Yamamoto, Naoji
    Sunahara, Atsushi
    Fujioka, Shinsuke
    Nakasima, Hideki
    JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER, 2014, 30 (01) : 54 - 61
  • [46] THE EFFECT OF MAGNETIC-FIELD STRENGTH ON THE EFFICIENCY OF MAGNETIC SEPARATION
    SVOBODA, J
    MINERALS ENGINEERING, 1994, 7 (5-6) : 747 - 757
  • [47] Rotating magnetic beacons magnetic field strength size in SAGD
    Tu, Bing
    Li, Desheng
    Lin, Enhuai
    Luo, Bin
    He, Jian
    Ye, Lezhi
    Liu, Jiliang
    Wang, Yuezhong
    FRONTIERS OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 5 (04) : 446 - 449
  • [48] DEVICE USED FOR DETERMINING MAGNETIC FIELD STRENGTHS DURING MAGNETIC FIELD STRENGTH VARIATIONS
    DEZEEUW, RG
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1965, 36 (11): : 1649 - &
  • [49] Estimating the magnetic field strength from magnetograms
    Asensio Ramos, A.
    Martinez Gonzalez, M. J.
    Manso Sainz, R.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2015, 577
  • [50] LOW FIELD-STRENGTH MAGNETIC SCANNERS
    OLDENDORF, W
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1985, 9 (06) : 1153 - 1154