Most-likely DCF Estimates of Magnetic Field Strength

被引:3
|
作者
Myers, Philip C. [1 ]
Stephens, Ian W. [2 ]
Coude, Simon [2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard & Smithsonian, Ctr Astrophys, 60 Garden St, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Worcester State Univ, Dept Earth Environm & Phys, Worcester, MA 01602 USA
来源
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL | 2024年 / 962卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
DISPERSION; CLOUD; STATISTICS; VELOCITY;
D O I
10.3847/1538-4357/ad1596
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The Davis-Chandrasekhar-Fermi (DCF) method is widely used to evaluate magnetic fields in star-forming regions. Yet it remains unclear how well DCF equations estimate the mean plane-of-the-sky field strength in a map region. To address this question, five DCF equations are applied to an idealized cloud map. Its polarization angles have a normal distribution with dispersion sigma(theta), and its density and velocity dispersion have negligible variation. Each DCF equation specifies a global field strength B-DCF and a distribution of local DCF estimates. The "most-likely" DCF field strength B-ml is the distribution mode, for which a correction factor beta(ml) equivalent to B-ml/B-DCF is calculated analytically. For each equation, beta(ml) < 1, indicating that B-DCF is a biased estimator of B-ml. The values of beta(ml) are beta(ml) approximate to 0.7 when B-DCF proportional to sigma(-1)(theta) due to turbulent excitation of Alfv & eacute;nic MHD waves, and beta(ml) approximate to 0.9 when B-DCF proportional to sigma(-1/2)(theta) due to non-Alfv & eacute;nic MHD waves. These statistical correction factors beta(ml) have partial agreement with correction factors beta sim obtained from MHD simulations. The relative importance of the statistical correction is estimated by assuming that each simulation correction has both a statistical and a physical component. Then the standard, structure function, and original DCF equations appear most accurate because they require the least physical correction. Their relative physical correction factors are 0.1, 0.3, and 0.4 on a scale from 0 to 1. In contrast, the large-angle and parallel-delta B equations have physical correction factors 0.6 and 0.7. These results may be useful in selecting DCF equations, within model limitations.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The strength and structure of the coronal magnetic field
    Spangler, Steven R.
    SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2005, 121 (1-4) : 189 - 200
  • [32] MAGNETIC FIELD STRENGTH AND ORGANISMIC ORIENTATION
    BROWN, FA
    BARNWELL, FH
    BIOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1960, 119 (02): : 306 - 306
  • [33] MAGNETIC DIODE FOR MEASUREMENT OF MAGNETIC-FIELD STRENGTH
    FEDOTOV, SI
    ZALKIND, VM
    INSTRUMENTS AND EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES, 1987, 30 (04) : 928 - 930
  • [34] Gradient Technique Theory: Tracing Magnetic Field and Obtaining Magnetic Field Strength
    Lazarian, Alex
    Yuen, Ka Ho
    Pogosyan, Dmitri
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 974 (02):
  • [35] Strength of the Solar Coronal Magnetic Field – A Comparison of Independent Estimates Using Contemporaneous Radio and White-Light Observations
    Anshu Kumari
    R. Ramesh
    C. Kathiravan
    T. J. Wang
    Solar Physics, 2017, 292
  • [36] Strength of the Solar Coronal Magnetic Field - A Comparison of Independent Estimates Using Contemporaneous Radio and White-Light Observations
    Kumari, Anshu
    Ramesh, R.
    Kathiravan, C.
    Wang, T. J.
    SOLAR PHYSICS, 2017, 292 (11)
  • [37] THE ESTIMATES OF THE MAGNETIC-FIELD IN HALLEYS-COMET
    PODGORNY, IM
    DUBININ, EM
    ISRAELEVICH, PL
    MOON AND THE PLANETS, 1982, 27 (01): : 135 - 138
  • [38] Electrojet Estimates From Mesospheric Magnetic Field Measurements
    Laundal, K. M.
    Yee, J. H.
    Merkin, V. G.
    Gjerloev, J. W.
    Vanhamaki, H.
    Reistad, J. P.
    Madelaire, M.
    Sorathia, K.
    Espy, P. J.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2021, 126 (05)
  • [39] Probing the magnetic field strength dependence of the chiral magnetic effect
    Christakoglou, Panos
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C, 2024, 84 (03):
  • [40] Magnetic drug targeting: biodistribution and dependency on magnetic field strength
    Alexiou, C
    Schmidt, A
    Klein, R
    Hulin, P
    Bergemann, C
    Arnold, W
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS, 2002, 252 (1-3) : 363 - 366