Reviewing FIGO 2018 cervical cancer staging

被引:2
|
作者
Soares, Leila Cristina [1 ]
de Souza, Ricardo Jose [2 ]
Oliveira, Marco Aurelio Pinho [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estado Rio De Janeiro, Dept Gynecol, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] Grande Rio Univ, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
关键词
D O I
10.1111/aogs.14667
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:1757 / 1758
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Revised FIGO Staging for Cervical Cancer - A New Role for MRI
    Merz, Johanna
    Bossart, Michaela
    Bamberg, Fabian
    Eisenblaetter, Michel
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2020, 192 (10): : 937 - 944
  • [32] SIGNIFICANCE OF HISTOLOGY AND NODAL STATUS ON THE SURVIVAL OF WOMEN WITH EARLY-STAGE CERVICAL CANCER: VALIDATION OF THE 2018 FIGO CERVICAL CANCER STAGING SYSTEM
    Machida, H.
    Matsuo, K.
    Kobayashi, Y.
    Momomura, M.
    Takahashi, F.
    Tabata, T.
    Kondo, E.
    Yamagami, W.
    Ebina, Y.
    Kaneuchi, M.
    Nagase, S.
    Mikami, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2021, 31 : A42 - A42
  • [33] Significance of histology and nodal status on the survival of women with early-stage cervical cancer: validation of the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system
    Machida, Hiroko
    Matsuo, Koji
    Kobayashi, Yoichi
    Momomura, Mai
    Takahashi, Fumiaki
    Tabata, Tsutomu
    Kondo, Eiji
    Yamagami, Wataru
    Ebina, Yasuhiko
    Kaneuchi, Masanori
    Nagase, Satoru
    Mikami, Mikio
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 (03)
  • [34] Revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) cervical cancer staging: A review of gaps and questions that remain
    Salvo, Gloria
    Odetto, Diego
    Pareja, Rene
    Frumovitz, Michael
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2020, 30 (06) : 873 - 878
  • [35] INFLUENCE OF NEW FIGO 2018 STAGING AND TREATMENT OUTCOMES IN EARLY STAGE CERVICAL CANCER: A SINGLE CENTRE STUDY
    Satinder, K.
    Garg, H.
    Nandwani, M.
    Kalita, M.
    Bansal, S.
    Singh, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2021, 31 : A60 - A60
  • [36] Interobserver agreement and prognostic impact for MRI-based 2018 FIGO staging parameters in uterine cervical cancer
    Wagner-Larsen, Kari S.
    Lura, Njal
    Salvesen, Oyvind
    Halle, Mari Kylleso
    Forsse, David
    Trovik, Jone
    Smit, Noeska
    Krakstad, Camilla
    Haldorsen, Ingfrid S.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (09) : 6444 - 6455
  • [37] Nomograms Predicting Survival of Cervical Cancer Patients Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Based on the 2018 FIGO Staging System
    Meng, Qingyu
    Wang, Weiping
    Liu, Xiaoliang
    Wang, Dunhuang
    Zhang, Fuquan
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [38] AJCC versus FIGO staging of cervical cancer to predict disease severity
    Liu, C. S.
    Spirtos, A.
    Khulpateea, B. R.
    Lea, J. S.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 149 : 155 - 155
  • [39] Application of 3.0 T multimodal MRI in FIGO staging of cervical cancer
    Pan, Liang
    Shan, Rui-Ying
    Gao, Su-Fang
    Zhou, Yan
    Bao, Yuan-Yuan
    Fu, Wenjing
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2024, 32 (02) : 823 - 830
  • [40] From FIGO-2009 to FIGO-2018 in women with early-stage cervical cancer; Does the revised staging reflect risk groups?
    Sponholtz, Sara Elisabeth
    Mogensen, Ole
    Hildebrandt, Malene Grubbe
    Schledermann, Doris
    Parner, Erik
    Markauskas, Algirdas
    Froding, Ligita Paskeviciute
    Fuglsang, Katrine
    Holm, Jorun
    Bjornholt, Sarah Marie
    Jensen, Pernille Tine
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 163 (02) : 281 - 288