Reviewing FIGO 2018 cervical cancer staging

被引:2
|
作者
Soares, Leila Cristina [1 ]
de Souza, Ricardo Jose [2 ]
Oliveira, Marco Aurelio Pinho [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estado Rio De Janeiro, Dept Gynecol, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] Grande Rio Univ, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
关键词
D O I
10.1111/aogs.14667
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:1757 / 1758
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Risk Stratification for Patients with Cervical Cancer in Stage IIIC1 of the 2018 FIGO Staging System
    Liu, Xiaoliang
    Wang, Weiping
    Hu, Ke
    Zhang, Fuquan
    Hou, Xiaorong
    Yan, Junfang
    Meng, Qingyu
    Zhou, Ziqi
    Miao, Zheng
    Guan, Hui
    Ma, Jiabin
    Shen, Jing
    Zhen, Hongnan
    Wang, Wenhui
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [22] Horizontal Tumor Extent is an Independent Prognostic Variable in Cervical Cancer: Implications for the 2018 FIGO Staging Update
    Zyla, Roman
    Olkhov-Mitsel, Ekaterina
    Gien, Lilian
    Mirkovic, Jelena
    Nofech-Mozes, Sharon
    Djordjevic, Bojana
    Parra-Herran, Carlos
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2020, 33 (SUPPL 2) : 1172 - 1173
  • [23] Interobserver agreement and prognostic impact for MRI–based 2018 FIGO staging parameters in uterine cervical cancer
    Kari S. Wagner-Larsen
    Njål Lura
    Øyvind Salvesen
    Mari Kyllesø Halle
    David Forsse
    Jone Trovik
    Noeska Smit
    Camilla Krakstad
    Ingfrid S. Haldorsen
    European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 6444 - 6455
  • [24] Horizontal Tumor Extent is an Independent Prognostic Variable in Cervical Cancer: Implications for the 2018 FIGO Staging Update
    Zyla, Roman
    Olkhov-Mitsel, Ekaterina
    Gien, Lilian
    Mirkovic, Jelena
    Nofech-Mozes, Sharon
    Djordjevic, Bojana
    Parra-Herran, Carlos
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2020, 100 (SUPPL 1) : 1172 - 1173
  • [25] Validation of the 2018 FIGO Staging System of Cervical Cancer for Stage III Patients with a Cohort from China
    Liu, Xiaoliang
    Wang, Junjie
    Hu, Ke
    Zhang, Fuquan
    Meng, Qingyu
    Wang, Weiping
    Wang, Dunhuang
    Zhou, Ziqi
    Ren, Kang
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2020, 12 : 1405 - 1410
  • [26] Oncologic outcomes in the era of modern radiation therapy using FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer
    Brodeur, Melica Nourmoussavi
    Dejean, Romain
    Beauchemin, Marie-Claude
    Samouelian, Vanessa
    Cormier, Beatrice
    Bacha, Omar Moreira
    Warkus, Thomas
    Barkati, Maroie
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 162 (02) : 277 - 283
  • [27] FIGO 2009 versus 2018 staging for cervical cancer: A comparative study on prediction of survival based on stage
    Washington, Christina Renay
    Zhao, Daniel
    Moore, Kathleen N.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 159 (02) : E37 - E37
  • [28] A Risk Stratification for Patients with Cervical Cancer in Stage IIIC1 of the 2018 FIGO Staging System
    Xiaoliang Liu
    Weiping Wang
    Ke Hu
    Fuquan Zhang
    Xiaorong Hou
    Junfang Yan
    Qingyu Meng
    Ziqi Zhou
    Zheng Miao
    Hui Guan
    Jiabin Ma
    Jing Shen
    Hongnan Zhen
    Wenhui Wang
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [29] FIGO 2009 versus 2018 staging for cervical cancer: A comparative study on prediction of survival based on stage
    Washington, C. R.
    Zhao, D.
    Moore, K. N.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 159 : 174 - 174
  • [30] Implications of the new FIGO staging and the role of imaging in cervical cancer
    Kido, Aki
    Nakamoto, Yuji
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 94 (1125):