Container port influence: a spatial diffusion analysis of global transshipments

被引:1
|
作者
Peng, Peng [1 ]
Poon, Jessie P. H. [2 ]
Cheng, Shifen [1 ]
Dong, Yang [3 ]
Yang, Yu [4 ]
Lu, Feng [1 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, State Key Lab Resources & Environm Informat Syst, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Geog, Buffalo, NY USA
[3] cElane Inc, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Fuzhou Univ, Acad Digital China, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[6] Jiangsu Ctr Collaborat Innovat Geog Informat Resou, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[7] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, 11A Datun Rd, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Container port influence; Matthew effect; reverse Matthew effect; Rotterdam; Busan; Zhoushan; HUB PORT; COMPETITIVENESS; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1080/03088839.2023.2289493
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
This paper examines the global diffusion patterns of over 1000 ports' container traffic from 2013 to 2022 to understand port influence dominance. Based on an influence maximization model of direct and indirect diffusion paths, it shows that two ports, Rotterdam and Singapore, consistently exert a disproportionate influence on other ports capturing the Matthew effect which proposes that influence begets influence. Initial advantage in capturing the global transshipment networks enabled both ports to widen and strengthen their influence with time. Despite their lead, Busan's rise indicates it is possible to catch up. However, the paper also found a reversed Matthew effect for Hamburg and Zhoushan indicating that initial advantage can vaporize if not sustained. The findings imply that ports' early capacity to capture the global transshipment market can lead to sustained advantage but such advantage can also be developed over time if port managers pay attention to indirect paths of capturing the global container market.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spatial Network Analysis of Container Port Operations: The Case of Ship Turnaround Times
    César Ducruet
    Hidekazu Itoh
    [J]. Networks and Spatial Economics, 2022, 22 : 883 - 902
  • [2] Spatial Network Analysis of Container Port Operations: The Case of Ship Turnaround Times
    Ducruet, Cesar
    Itoh, Hidekazu
    [J]. NETWORKS & SPATIAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 22 (04): : 883 - 902
  • [3] THE ANALYSIS OF THE CONTAINER TRAFFIC MOVEMENT IN THE PORT OF RIJEKA COMPARED TO THE CONTAINER TRAFFIC IN THE PORT OF KOPER
    Tomasevic, Marko
    Jadrijevic, Nela
    Dundovic, Cedomir
    [J]. POMORSTVO-SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF MARITIME RESEARCH, 2011, 25 (02) : 469 - 485
  • [4] Global Container Port Network Linkages and Topology in 2021
    Kang, Lu
    Wu, Wenzhou
    Yu, Hao
    Su, Fenzhen
    [J]. SENSORS, 2022, 22 (15)
  • [5] Peripherality in the global container shipping network: the case of the Southern African container port system
    Fraser, Darren Ronald
    Notteboom, Theo
    Ducruet, Cesar
    [J]. GEOJOURNAL, 2016, 81 (01) : 139 - 151
  • [6] How Does a Port Build Influence? Diffusion Patterns in Global Oil Transportation
    Peng, Peng
    Claramunt, Christophe
    Cheng, Shifen
    Lu, Feng
    [J]. SENSORS, 2022, 22 (22)
  • [7] Congestion, port expansion and spatial competition for US container imports
    Fan, Lei
    Wilson, William W.
    Dahl, Bruce
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2012, 48 (06) : 1121 - 1136
  • [8] The integration of China's port system into global container shipping
    Comtois C.
    [J]. GeoJournal, 1999, 48 (1) : 35 - 42
  • [9] Port connectivity study: An analysis framework from a global container liner shipping network perspective
    Jiang, Jianlin
    Lee, Loo Hay
    Chew, Ek Peng
    Gan, Chee Chun
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2015, 73 : 47 - 64
  • [10] Game Theory Analysis of Container Port Alliance
    Xu, Fangqin
    Lu, Haifeng
    Ding, Nan
    Liu, Jingao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH, 2015, : 635 - 640