Global Container Port Network Linkages and Topology in 2021

被引:9
|
作者
Kang, Lu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wu, Wenzhou [1 ,3 ]
Yu, Hao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Su, Fenzhen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, State Key Lab Resources & Environm Informat Syst, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Coll Resources & Environm, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr South China Sea Studies, Nanjing 210093, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
global liner shipping network; port accessibility; Space-L; complex network; maritime transport; shipping community detection; CONNECTIVITY; VULNERABILITY; CENTRALITY;
D O I
10.3390/s22155889
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The maritime transport of containers between ports accounts for the bulk of global trade by weight and value. Transport impedance among ports through transit times and port infrastructures can, however, impact accessibility, trade performance, and the attractiveness of ports. Assessments of the transit routes between ports based on performance and attractiveness criteria can provide a topological liner shipping network that quantifies the performance profile of ports. Here, we constructed a directed global liner shipping network (GLSN) of the top six liner shipping companies between the ports of Africa, Asia, North/South America, Europe, and Oceania. Network linkages and community groupings were quantified through a container port accessibility evaluation model, which quantified the performance of the port using betweenness centrality, the transport impedance among ports with the transit time, and the performance of ports using the Port Liner Shipping Connectivity Index. The in-degree and out-degree of the GLSN conformed to the power-law distribution, respectively, and their R-square fitting accuracy was greater than 0.96. The community partition illustrated an obvious consistence with the actual trading flow. The accessibility evaluation result showed that the ports in Asia and Europe had a higher accessibility than those of other regions. Most of the top 30 ports with the highest accessibility are Asian (17) and European (10) ports. Singapore, Port Klang, and Rotterdam have the highest accessibility. Our research may be helpful for further studies such as species invasion and the planning of ports.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measuring the effect of distance on the network topology of the Global Container Shipping Network
    Dimitrios Tsiotas
    César Ducruet
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 11
  • [2] Measuring the effect of distance on the network topology of the Global Container Shipping Network
    Tsiotas, Dimitrios
    Ducruet, Cesar
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [3] Peripherality in the global container shipping network: the case of the Southern African container port system
    Fraser, Darren Ronald
    Notteboom, Theo
    Ducruet, Cesar
    [J]. GEOJOURNAL, 2016, 81 (01) : 139 - 151
  • [4] A connectivity-based approach to evaluating port importance in the global container shipping network
    Jarumaneeroj, Pisit
    Ramudhin, Amar
    Lawton, Jorge Barnett
    [J]. MARITIME ECONOMICS & LOGISTICS, 2023, 25 (03) : 602 - 622
  • [5] A connectivity-based approach to evaluating port importance in the global container shipping network
    Pisit Jarumaneeroj
    Amar Ramudhin
    Jorge Barnett Lawton
    [J]. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2023, 25 : 602 - 622
  • [6] Container Transport Network Optimization Model under Container Port Competition
    Zhang Tingfa
    Zhang Liangzhi
    Zhang Licai
    Zhao Qingzhen
    [J]. 2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATION AND LOGISTICS, VOLS 1-6, 2008, : 2224 - +
  • [7] Port connectivity study: An analysis framework from a global container liner shipping network perspective
    Jiang, Jianlin
    Lee, Loo Hay
    Chew, Ek Peng
    Gan, Chee Chun
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2015, 73 : 47 - 64
  • [8] An evolution of the Global Container Shipping Network: port connectivity and trading community structure (2011-2017)
    Jarumaneeroj, Pisit
    Lawton, Jorge Barnett
    Svindland, Morten
    [J]. MARITIME ECONOMICS & LOGISTICS, 2024, 26 (02) : 283 - 306
  • [9] Modelling the global maritime container network
    Huang, Yanni
    Rashidi, Taha Hossein
    Gardner, Lauren
    [J]. MARITIME ECONOMICS & LOGISTICS, 2018, 20 (03) : 400 - 420
  • [10] Modelling the global maritime container network
    Yanni Huang
    Taha Hossein Rashidi
    Lauren Gardner
    [J]. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2018, 20 : 400 - 420