Welfare of laying hens on farm

被引:19
|
作者
Nielsen, Soren Saxmose
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Canali, Elisabetta
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin-Bastuji, Bruno
Rojas, Jose Luis Gonzales
Schmidt, Christian Gortazar
Herskin, Mette
Chueca, Miguel angel Miranda
Padalino, Barbara
Pasquali, Paolo
Roberts, Helen Clare
Spoolder, Hans
Stahl, Karl
Velarde, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Winckler, Christoph
Estevez, Inmaculada
Guinebretiere, Maryse
Rodenburg, Bas
Schrader, Lars
Tiemann, Inga
Van Niekerk, Thea
Ardizzone, Michele
Ashe, Sean
Hempen, Michaela
Mosbach-Schulz, Olaf
Gimeno, Cristina Rojo
Van Der Stede, Yves
Vitali, Marika
Michel, Virginie
机构
关键词
laying hens; on-farm welfare; husbandry systems; welfare consequences; animal-based measures; end the cage age; beak trimming; KEEL-BONE-FRACTURES; INFRARED BEAK TREATMENT; ASCARIDIA-GALLI INFECTIONS; AFFECTING RANGING BEHAVIOR; FEATHER PECKING BEHAVIOR; BURMESE RED JUNGLEFOWL; NEST SITE SELECTION; NORTHERN FOWL MITES; FOOT PAD DISORDERS; DOMESTIC-FOWL;
D O I
10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7789
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
This scientific opinion focuses on the welfare of laying hens, pullets and layer breeders on farm. The most relevant husbandry systems used in Europe are described. For each system, highly relevant welfare consequences were identified, as well as related animal-based measures (ABMs), and hazards leading to the welfare consequences. Moreover, measures to prevent or correct the hazards and/or mitigate the welfare consequences are recommended. The highly relevant welfare consequences based on severity, duration and frequency of occurrence are bone lesions, group stress, inability to avoid unwanted sexual behaviour, inability to perform comfort behaviour, inability to perform exploratory or foraging behaviour, isolation stress, predation stress, resting problems, restriction of movement, skin disorders and soft tissue lesions and integument damage. The welfare consequences of non-cage compared to cage systems for laying hens are described and minimum enclosure characteristics are described for laying hens, pullets and layer breeders. Beak trimming, which causes negative welfare consequences and is conducted to reduce the prevalence and severity of pecking, is described as well as the risks associated with rearing of non-beak-trimmed flocks. Alternatives to reduce sharpness of the beak without trimming are suggested. Finally, total mortality, plumage damage, wounds, keel bone fractures and carcass condemnations are the most promising ABMs for collection at slaughterhouses to monitor the level of laying hen welfare on farm. Main recommendations include housing all birds in non-cage systems with easily accessible, elevated platforms and provision of dry and friable litter and access to a covered veranda. It is further recommended to implement protocols to define welfare trait information to encourage progress in genetic selection, implement measures to prevent injurious pecking, rear pullets with dark brooders and reduce male aggression in layer breeders.
引用
收藏
页数:188
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Associations between welfare indicators and environmental choice in laying hens
    Nicol, Christine J.
    Caplen, Gina
    Edgar, Joanne
    Browne, William J.
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2009, 78 (02) : 413 - 424
  • [42] Feather Pecking in Laying Hens: Why They Do It, and Welfare Implications
    Nicol, Christine J.
    POULTRY FEATHERS AND SKIN: THE POULTRY INTEGUMENT IN HEALTH AND WELFARE, 2019, 32 : 31 - 46
  • [43] The welfare evaluation of laying hens reared with alternative housing systems
    Zotte, A. Dalle
    Gottardo, F.
    Ravarotto, L.
    Bertuzzi, S.
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2003, 2 : 462 - 464
  • [44] Welfare implications of bacterial and viral infectious diseases for laying hens
    Noormohammadi, Amir H.
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2021, 61 (9-10) : 1018 - 1030
  • [45] Influence of Different Light Spectrums on Behaviour and Welfare in Laying Hens
    Wichman, Anette
    De Groot, Rosan
    Hastad, Olle
    Wall, Helena
    Rubene, Diana
    ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (04):
  • [46] Farm level factors associated with feather pecking in organic laying hens
    Bestman, MWP
    Wagenaar, JP
    LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2003, 80 (1-2): : 133 - 140
  • [47] A computer model for welfare assessment of poultry production systems for laying hens
    De Mol, R. M.
    Schouten, W. G. P.
    Evers, E.
    Drost, H.
    Houwers, H. W. J.
    Smits, A. C.
    NJAS-WAGENINGEN JOURNAL OF LIFE SCIENCES, 2006, 54 (02) : 157 - 168
  • [48] Impacts of beak trimming and dietary fiber on welfare and productivity of laying hens
    Shi, Haipeng
    Tolba, Samar
    Leone, Vanessa
    Adcock, Sarah J.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 102 : 3 - 4
  • [49] AMMONIA, DUST AND BACTERIA IN WELFARE-ORIENTED SYSTEMS FOR LAYING HENS
    Nimmermark, Sven
    Lund, Vonne
    Gustafsson, Gosta
    Eduard, Wijnand
    ANNALS OF AGRICULTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2009, 16 (01) : 103 - 113
  • [50] The LayWel project:: welfare implications of changes in production systems for laying hens
    Blokhuis, H. J.
    Van Niekerk, T. Fiks
    Bessei, W.
    Elson, A.
    Guemene, D.
    Kjaer, J. B.
    Levrino, G. A. Maria
    Nicol, C. J.
    Tauson, R.
    Weeks, C. A.
    Van de Weerd, H. A.
    WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2007, 63 (01) : 101 - 114