Welfare of laying hens on farm

被引:19
|
作者
Nielsen, Soren Saxmose
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Canali, Elisabetta
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin-Bastuji, Bruno
Rojas, Jose Luis Gonzales
Schmidt, Christian Gortazar
Herskin, Mette
Chueca, Miguel angel Miranda
Padalino, Barbara
Pasquali, Paolo
Roberts, Helen Clare
Spoolder, Hans
Stahl, Karl
Velarde, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Winckler, Christoph
Estevez, Inmaculada
Guinebretiere, Maryse
Rodenburg, Bas
Schrader, Lars
Tiemann, Inga
Van Niekerk, Thea
Ardizzone, Michele
Ashe, Sean
Hempen, Michaela
Mosbach-Schulz, Olaf
Gimeno, Cristina Rojo
Van Der Stede, Yves
Vitali, Marika
Michel, Virginie
机构
关键词
laying hens; on-farm welfare; husbandry systems; welfare consequences; animal-based measures; end the cage age; beak trimming; KEEL-BONE-FRACTURES; INFRARED BEAK TREATMENT; ASCARIDIA-GALLI INFECTIONS; AFFECTING RANGING BEHAVIOR; FEATHER PECKING BEHAVIOR; BURMESE RED JUNGLEFOWL; NEST SITE SELECTION; NORTHERN FOWL MITES; FOOT PAD DISORDERS; DOMESTIC-FOWL;
D O I
10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7789
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
This scientific opinion focuses on the welfare of laying hens, pullets and layer breeders on farm. The most relevant husbandry systems used in Europe are described. For each system, highly relevant welfare consequences were identified, as well as related animal-based measures (ABMs), and hazards leading to the welfare consequences. Moreover, measures to prevent or correct the hazards and/or mitigate the welfare consequences are recommended. The highly relevant welfare consequences based on severity, duration and frequency of occurrence are bone lesions, group stress, inability to avoid unwanted sexual behaviour, inability to perform comfort behaviour, inability to perform exploratory or foraging behaviour, isolation stress, predation stress, resting problems, restriction of movement, skin disorders and soft tissue lesions and integument damage. The welfare consequences of non-cage compared to cage systems for laying hens are described and minimum enclosure characteristics are described for laying hens, pullets and layer breeders. Beak trimming, which causes negative welfare consequences and is conducted to reduce the prevalence and severity of pecking, is described as well as the risks associated with rearing of non-beak-trimmed flocks. Alternatives to reduce sharpness of the beak without trimming are suggested. Finally, total mortality, plumage damage, wounds, keel bone fractures and carcass condemnations are the most promising ABMs for collection at slaughterhouses to monitor the level of laying hen welfare on farm. Main recommendations include housing all birds in non-cage systems with easily accessible, elevated platforms and provision of dry and friable litter and access to a covered veranda. It is further recommended to implement protocols to define welfare trait information to encourage progress in genetic selection, implement measures to prevent injurious pecking, rear pullets with dark brooders and reduce male aggression in layer breeders.
引用
收藏
页数:188
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Scientific Opinion on welfare aspects of the use of perches for laying hens
    Berg, Charlotte
    Botner, Anette
    Browman, Howard
    De Koeijer, Aline
    Depner, Klaus
    Domingo, Mariano
    Edwards, Sandra
    Fourichon, Christine
    Koenen, Frank
    More, Simon
    Raj, Mohan
    Sihvonen, Liisa
    Spoolder, Hans
    Stegeman, Jan Arend
    Thulke, Hans-Hermann
    Vagsholm, Ivar
    Velarde, Antonio
    Willeberg, Preben
    Ducrot, Christian
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2015, 13 (06)
  • [32] Evaluation of welfare parameters in laying hens on the basis of a Bavarian survey
    Louton, H.
    Bergmann, S. M.
    Rauch, E.
    Liebers, C.
    Reese, S.
    Erhard, M. H.
    Hoeborn, C.
    Schwarzer, A.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2017, 96 (09) : 3199 - 3213
  • [33] ANIMAL-WELFARE PROBLEMS REGARDING THE KEEPING OF LAYING HENS
    RUPPERT, E
    DEUTSCHE TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1983, 90 (02): : 79 - 79
  • [34] Behaviour and welfare of laying hens in conventional and modified battery cages
    Jendral, M. J.
    Church, J. S.
    Feddes, J. J. R.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2006, 85 : 102 - 102
  • [35] Challenges of the new requirements for welfare of laying hens housed in cages
    Michel, V.
    Guinebretiere, M.
    SUSTAINABLE ANIMAL PRODUCTION: THE CHALLENGES AND POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL FARMING, 2009, : 329 - 345
  • [36] Feather pecking behaviour and associated welfare issues in laying hens
    Dixon, Laura Marie
    AVIAN BIOLOGY RESEARCH, 2008, 1 (02) : 73 - 87
  • [37] INTEGRATION OF ANIMAL-WELFARE INTO HOUSING SYSTEMS FOR LAYING HENS
    BLOKHUIS, HJ
    METZ, JHM
    NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1992, 40 (03): : 327 - 337
  • [38] EFFECT OF DIFFERENT HOUSING SYSTEMS ON PRODUCTIVITY AND WELFARE OF LAYING HENS
    Sosnowka-Czajka, Ewa
    Herbut, Eugeniusz
    Skomorucha, Iwona
    ANNALS OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2010, 10 (04): : 349 - 360
  • [39] Pop hole passages and welfare in furnished cages for laying hens
    Wall, H
    Tauson, R
    Elwinger, K
    BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 2004, 45 (01) : 20 - 27
  • [40] RESEARCH APPROACHES FOR IMPROVING THE PHYSICAL WELFARE AND ENVIRONMENT OF LAYING HENS
    TAUSON, R
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, VOL 6, SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT 2: AN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FARM ANIMAL WELFARE : SCIENTIFIC PERSPECTIVES, 1991, : 76 - 85