Biodiversity Benefits of Birdwatching Using Citizen Science Data and Individualized Recreational Demand Models

被引:5
|
作者
Jayalath, Tharaka A. A. [1 ]
Lloyd-Smith, Patrick [1 ]
Becker, Marcus [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Coll Agr & Bioresources, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Rm 3D34 Agr Bldg,51 Campus Dr, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A8, Canada
[2] Alberta Biodivers Monitoring Inst, Edmonton, AB, Canada
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS | 2023年 / 86卷 / 1-2期
关键词
Biodiversity benefits; Birds; Citizen science data; Nonmarket values; Travel cost; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; TRAVEL COST; MIGRATORY SHOREBIRDS; CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; PREFERENCE METHODS; SAMPLE SELECTION; WATER LEVELS; CONSERVATION; TOURISM; HETEROGENEITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-023-00788-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Birding is one of the most popular recreational activities, but bird populations have been declining worldwide. Understanding how much people benefit from local bird populations levels, species richness and their preferences can help inform bird conservation management. This paper uses eBird data and random utility models to assess the birders' preferences and welfare for trips to local areas. The sample eBird citizen science data includes 35,656 trips by 290 individual birders to 1227 unique birding hotspots in Alberta, Canada. The economic value of seeing one additional bird species during a trip is estimated to be $0.68 on average. We estimated a nonlinear relationship between the utility and number of bird species suggesting satiation in recreation preferences, and the highest MWTP is estimated to be in the summer and fall seasons. Bird species at risk, based on Alberta's strategy for the management of species at risk, are valued almost ten times higher as seeing other types of bird species. We also estimate individualized choice models and find that preference for species richness is heterogeneous across birders. Results of a combinatorial test find that the individualized choice models produce average welfare estimates that are 67% higher than the single model but the difference is not statistically significant. The members of eBird represent a convenience sample that may not constitute the general population. Thus along with proper weighting, these benefit estimates produced in this research can help inform future bird conservation management decisions including alternative funding mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 107
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Crowdsourcing biodiversity data from recreational SCUBA divers using Dive Reporter
    Buzinkai, Matej
    Radeta, Marko
    Rodrigues, Claudio
    Silva, Francisco
    Freitas, Ruben
    Chebaane, Sahar
    Parretti, Paola
    Schafer, Susanne
    Silva, Rodrigo
    Gizzi, Francesca
    Almeida, Silvia
    Gueroun, Sonia K. M.
    Canning-Clode, Joao
    Monteiro, Joao Gama
    ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 77
  • [42] Capitalizing on opportunistic citizen science data to monitor urban biodiversity: A multi-taxa framework
    Callaghan, Corey T.
    Ozeroff, Ian
    Hitchcock, Colleen
    Chandler, Mark
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2020, 251
  • [43] Citizen science rapidly delivers extensive distribution data for birds in a key tropical biodiversity area
    Squires, Thomas M.
    Yuda, Pramana
    Akbar, Panji Gusti
    Collar, Nigel J.
    Devenish, Christian
    Taufiqurrahman, Imam
    Wibowo, Waskito Kukuh
    Winarni, Nurul L.
    Yanuar, Ahmad
    Marsden, Stuart J.
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2021, 28
  • [44] Cetacean biodiversity in the Bay of Biscay: Suggestions for environmental protection derived from citizen science data
    Matear, Liam
    Robbins, James R.
    Hale, Michelle
    Potts, Jonathan
    MARINE POLICY, 2019, 109
  • [45] Beyond water data: Benefits to volunteers and to local water from a citizen science program
    Church, Sarah P.
    Payne, Lindsey B.
    Peel, Sara
    Prokopy, Linda S.
    JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE, 2022, 37 (01) : 170 - 170
  • [46] Rapidly mapping fire effects on biodiversity at a large-scale using citizen science
    Kirchhoff, Casey
    Callaghan, Corey T.
    Keith, David A.
    Indiarto, Dony
    Taseski, Guy
    Ooi, Mark Kj
    Le Breton, Tom D.
    Mesaglio, Thomas
    Kingsford, Richard T.
    Cornwell, William K.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 755
  • [47] Using a citizen science program to monitor coral reef biodiversity through space and time
    Simone Branchini
    Francesco Pensa
    Patrizia Neri
    Bianca Maria Tonucci
    Lisa Mattielli
    Anna Collavo
    Maria Elena Sillingardi
    Corrado Piccinetti
    Francesco Zaccanti
    Stefano Goffredo
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2015, 24 : 319 - 336
  • [48] An Urban Biodiversity Assessment Framework That Combines an Urban Habitat Classification Scheme and Citizen Science Data
    Li, Enjie
    Parker, Sophie S.
    Pauly, Gregory B.
    Randall, John M.
    Brown, Brian V.
    Cohen, Brian S.
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 7
  • [49] Multispecies deep learning using citizen science data produces more informative plant community models
    Brun, Philipp
    Karger, Dirk N.
    Zurell, Damaris
    Descombes, Patrice
    de Witte, Lucienne C.
    de Lutio, Riccardo
    Wegner, Jan Dirk
    Zimmermann, Niklaus E.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [50] Challenges for biodiversity monitoring using citizen science in transitioning social-ecological systems
    Loos, Jacqueline
    Horcea-Milcu, Andra I.
    Kirkland, Paul
    Hartel, Tibor
    Osvath-Ferencz, Marta
    Fischer, Joern
    JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION, 2015, 26 : 45 - 48