Biodiversity Benefits of Birdwatching Using Citizen Science Data and Individualized Recreational Demand Models

被引:5
|
作者
Jayalath, Tharaka A. A. [1 ]
Lloyd-Smith, Patrick [1 ]
Becker, Marcus [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Coll Agr & Bioresources, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Rm 3D34 Agr Bldg,51 Campus Dr, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A8, Canada
[2] Alberta Biodivers Monitoring Inst, Edmonton, AB, Canada
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS | 2023年 / 86卷 / 1-2期
关键词
Biodiversity benefits; Birds; Citizen science data; Nonmarket values; Travel cost; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; TRAVEL COST; MIGRATORY SHOREBIRDS; CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; PREFERENCE METHODS; SAMPLE SELECTION; WATER LEVELS; CONSERVATION; TOURISM; HETEROGENEITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-023-00788-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Birding is one of the most popular recreational activities, but bird populations have been declining worldwide. Understanding how much people benefit from local bird populations levels, species richness and their preferences can help inform bird conservation management. This paper uses eBird data and random utility models to assess the birders' preferences and welfare for trips to local areas. The sample eBird citizen science data includes 35,656 trips by 290 individual birders to 1227 unique birding hotspots in Alberta, Canada. The economic value of seeing one additional bird species during a trip is estimated to be $0.68 on average. We estimated a nonlinear relationship between the utility and number of bird species suggesting satiation in recreation preferences, and the highest MWTP is estimated to be in the summer and fall seasons. Bird species at risk, based on Alberta's strategy for the management of species at risk, are valued almost ten times higher as seeing other types of bird species. We also estimate individualized choice models and find that preference for species richness is heterogeneous across birders. Results of a combinatorial test find that the individualized choice models produce average welfare estimates that are 67% higher than the single model but the difference is not statistically significant. The members of eBird represent a convenience sample that may not constitute the general population. Thus along with proper weighting, these benefit estimates produced in this research can help inform future bird conservation management decisions including alternative funding mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 107
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Can information from citizen science data be used to predict biodiversity in stormwater ponds?
    Johansson, Frank
    Heino, Jani
    Coiffard, Paul
    Svanback, Richard
    Wester, Jacob
    Bini, Luis Mauricio
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [32] Can information from citizen science data be used to predict biodiversity in stormwater ponds?
    Frank Johansson
    Jani Heino
    Paul Coiffard
    Richard Svanbäck
    Jacob Wester
    Luis Mauricio Bini
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [33] Overcoming the challenges of public data archiving for citizen science biodiversity recording and monitoring schemes
    Pearce-Higgins, James W.
    Baillie, Stephen R.
    Boughey, Katherine
    Bourn, Nigel A. D.
    Foppen, Ruud P. B.
    Gillings, Simon
    Gregory, Richard D.
    Hunt, Tom
    Jiguet, Frederic
    Lehikoinen, Aleksi
    Musgrove, Andy J.
    Robinson, Rob A.
    Roy, David B.
    Siriwardena, Gavin M.
    Walker, Kevin J.
    Wilson, Jeremy D.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2018, 55 (06) : 2544 - 2551
  • [34] Experimental evidence that behavioral nudges in citizen science projects can improve biodiversity data
    Callaghan, Corey T.
    Thompson, Maureen
    Woods, Adam
    Poore, Alistair G. B.
    Bowler, Diana E.
    Samonte, Fabrice
    Rowley, Jodi J. L.
    Roslan, Nadiah
    Kingsford, Richard T.
    Cornwell, William K.
    Major, Richard E.
    BIOSCIENCE, 2023, 73 (04) : 302 - 313
  • [35] Using Citizen Science to Collect Coastal Monitoring Data
    Hart, John
    Blenkinsopp, Chris
    JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH, 2020, : 824 - 828
  • [36] EVALUATING URBAN BIODIVERSITY: EFFECTIVENESS OF CITIZEN SCIENCE DRIVEN SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELS IN URBAN ECOSYSTEMS
    Buehrs, Malte
    Zepp, Harald
    Schmitt, Thomas
    ERDKUNDE, 2024, 78 (03)
  • [37] A Citizen Science Approach for the Collection of Data to Train Deep Learning Models
    Saliba, Chantelle
    Seychell, Dylan
    Buhagiar, Joseph
    2022 IEEE 21ST MEDITERRANEAN ELECTROTECHNICAL CONFERENCE (IEEE MELECON 2022), 2022, : 990 - 995
  • [38] Spatial distribution of biodiversity citizen science in a natural area depends on area accessibility and differs from other recreational area use
    Mandeville, Caitlin P.
    Nilsen, Erlend B.
    Finstad, Anders G.
    ECOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS AND EVIDENCE, 2022, 3 (04):
  • [39] Incorporating citizen science data in spatially explicit integrated population models
    Sun, Catherine C.
    Royle, J. Andrew
    Fuller, Angela K.
    ECOLOGY, 2019, 100 (09)
  • [40] Beyond water data: benefits to volunteers and to local water from a citizen science program
    Church, Sarah P.
    Payne, Lindsey B.
    Peel, Sara
    Prokopy, Linda S.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 62 (02) : 306 - 326