Does implementation of a environmental protection tax reduce energy consumption: evidence from China

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Xing [1 ]
Xu, Shulin [1 ]
Xiong, Yunjun [2 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Cultural Tourism & Geog, Guangzhou 510320, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Publ Econ & Adm, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
关键词
Environmental protection tax; Green energy consumption; Green finance; Technology innovation; Industrial structure upgrading; Tax collection intensity; EFFICIENCY; SYSTEMS; TRADE;
D O I
10.1007/s10479-023-05805-5
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Environmental friendliness and energy conservation are good guarantees and driving forces for the sustainable development. How to coordinate the relationship between the two is crucial for building a "resource saving" and "environmentally friendly" society. This article uses the data from Chinese cities from 2010 to 2021 to explore whether environmental protection tax (EPT) could reduce energy consumption. Baseline regression found that EPT significantly reduced China's energy consumption and achieved a "resource saving" society. The EPT shows obvious heterogeneity characteristics, significantly reducing energy consumption in the central and western regions and the two-controlled areas, while the policy effect on the eastern region and non two-controlled areas is not significant. In addition, EPT has effectively reduced China's energy consumption by enhancing investment in urban research and development innovation, optimizing industrial structure, and strengthening tax collection intensity. The conclusion is helpful in achieving the construction of an "environmentally friendly" society.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does the Urban Agglomeration Policy Reduce Energy Intensity? Evidence from China
    Ding, Rui
    Zhou, Tao
    Yin, Jian
    Zhang, Yilin
    Shen, Siwei
    Fu, Jun
    Du, Linyu
    Du, Yiming
    Chen, Shihui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (22)
  • [32] Government environmental protection subsidies, environmental tax collection, and green innovation: evidence from listed enterprises in China
    Zhangsheng Jiang
    Chenghao Xu
    Jie Zhou
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 4627 - 4641
  • [33] Has environmental protection tax reform promoted green transformation of enterprises? Evidence from China
    Yu Y.
    Liu J.
    Wang Q.
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (20) : 29472 - 29496
  • [34] Government environmental protection subsidies, environmental tax collection, and green innovation: evidence from listed enterprises in China
    Jiang, Zhangsheng
    Xu, Chenghao
    Zhou, Jie
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (02) : 4627 - 4641
  • [35] Can environmental protection tax drive manufacturing carbon unlocking? Empirical evidence from China
    Wen, Limin
    Sun, Shufang
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 11
  • [36] The influence of China Environmental Protection Tax Law on firm performance - evidence from stock markets
    He, Yu
    Wen, Chuanhao
    He, Jia
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2020, 27 (13) : 1044 - 1047
  • [37] Environmental protection tax law and corporate financial fraud: Evidence from listed firms in China
    Zhao, Yunhai
    Liu, Rui
    Xue, Junyi
    Wu, Qihe
    Zhang, Xiaohua
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 96
  • [38] Tax incentives and environmental protection: evidence from China's taxpayer-level data
    Mao, Jie
    Wang, Chunhua
    CHINA FINANCE AND ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 4
  • [39] Does tax enforcement reduce corporate environmental investment? evidence from a quasi-natural experiment
    He, Lu
    Xu, Lin
    Duan, Kaifeng
    Rao, Yulei
    Zheng, Chuanzhen
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2024, 12
  • [40] Does new energy consumption conducive to controlling fossil energy consumption and carbon emissions?-Evidence from China
    Cang Dingbang
    Chen Gang
    Chen Qing
    Sui Lili
    Cui Caiyun
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2021, 74