Does implementation of a environmental protection tax reduce energy consumption: evidence from China

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Xing [1 ]
Xu, Shulin [1 ]
Xiong, Yunjun [2 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Cultural Tourism & Geog, Guangzhou 510320, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Publ Econ & Adm, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
关键词
Environmental protection tax; Green energy consumption; Green finance; Technology innovation; Industrial structure upgrading; Tax collection intensity; EFFICIENCY; SYSTEMS; TRADE;
D O I
10.1007/s10479-023-05805-5
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Environmental friendliness and energy conservation are good guarantees and driving forces for the sustainable development. How to coordinate the relationship between the two is crucial for building a "resource saving" and "environmentally friendly" society. This article uses the data from Chinese cities from 2010 to 2021 to explore whether environmental protection tax (EPT) could reduce energy consumption. Baseline regression found that EPT significantly reduced China's energy consumption and achieved a "resource saving" society. The EPT shows obvious heterogeneity characteristics, significantly reducing energy consumption in the central and western regions and the two-controlled areas, while the policy effect on the eastern region and non two-controlled areas is not significant. In addition, EPT has effectively reduced China's energy consumption by enhancing investment in urban research and development innovation, optimizing industrial structure, and strengthening tax collection intensity. The conclusion is helpful in achieving the construction of an "environmentally friendly" society.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Environmental protection tax and firms' ESG investment: Evidence from China
    Wang, Xiaolin
    Ye, Yingying
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2024, 131
  • [12] How Does Environmental Protection Tax Affect Urban Energy Consumption in China? New Insights from the Intensity Difference-in-Differences Model
    Xu, Xianpu
    Huang, Lingyun
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (10)
  • [13] Does China's Environmental Protection Tax Law Effectively Influence Firms? Evidence from Stock Markets
    He, Yu
    Wen, Chuanhao
    Zheng, Huan
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2021, 57 (15) : 4436 - 4447
  • [14] The reduce of energy consumption intensity: Does the development of science and technology finance matter? Evidence from China
    Ding, Rui
    Chen, Shihui
    Zhang, Bin
    Shen, Siwei
    Zhou, Tao
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 11206 - 11220
  • [15] Does Environmental Policy Reduce Enterprise Innovation?-Evidence from China
    Feng, Chen
    Shi, Beibei
    Kang, Rong
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (06)
  • [16] Does Technological Innovation Reduce Environmental Degradation? Evidence from China
    Khalid, Tayiba
    Wen, Jun
    Khalid, Momena
    Khalid, Samia
    Zakaria, Muhammad
    Mahmood, Hamid
    INZINERINE EKONOMIKA-ENGINEERING ECONOMICS, 2023, 34 (03): : 323 - 334
  • [17] Environmental protection tax and enterprises' green technology innovation: Evidence from China
    Wang, Xiaoyan
    Wang, Shimeng
    Wu, Keying
    Zhai, Chenzhe
    Li, Yongle
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2024, 96
  • [18] How Does Land Monopoly Reduce Consumption Levels? Evidence from China
    Cheng, Jian
    Zhao, Jiangmeng
    LAND, 2023, 12 (09)
  • [19] Does nuclear or renewable energy consumption help to control environmental pollution? New evidence from China
    Azam, Anam
    Rafiq, Muhammad
    Shafique, Muhammad
    Yuan, Jiahai
    RENEWABLE ENERGY FOCUS, 2021, 39 : 139 - 147
  • [20] Does environmental regulation promote enterprise profitability? Evidence from the implementation of China's newly revised Environmental Protection Law
    Zhou, Di
    Qiu, Yuan
    Wang, Mingzhe
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2021, 102