Online focus groups as a tool to study policy professionals

被引:2
|
作者
Berkhout, Joost [1 ]
Crepaz, Michele [2 ]
Hanegraaff, Marcel [1 ]
Junk, Wiebke Marie [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Fac Social & Behav Sci, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, NL-1012 DL Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Hist Anthropol Philosophy & Polit, Belfast, North Ireland
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Polit Sci, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
focus groups; interview methods; political elites; lobbyists; policymakers; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1177/20531680231211398
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Scholars interested in political elites and policy professionals only sporadically rely on focus group methods. In this article, we argue why this is a missed opportunity. Based on our own recent research experience, we suggest three innovations to the focus group method that should make it appealing for political scientists who study professionals active in the policy process. First, focus groups allow for the study of the interactions between political elites in ways other methods cannot. Second, the method can be used for hypothesis testing when focus groups are designed accordingly. Third, the option to conduct focus groups online has major advantages in terms of participant costs, ease of recruitment, and, potentially, research equity. We hope that our suggestions are useful for researchers wanting to build on any one-or all-of these innovations.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ANONYMIZED FOCUS GROUPS AS A RESEARCH TOOL FOR HEALTH-PROFESSIONALS
    WHITE, GE
    THOMSON, AN
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 1995, 5 (02) : 256 - 261
  • [2] Online Focus Groups
    Stewart, David W.
    Shamdasani, Prem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2017, 46 (01) : 48 - 60
  • [3] Focus groups as a tool for fish and wildlife management: A case study
    DiCamillo, JA
    [J]. WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 1995, 23 (04) : 616 - 620
  • [4] The analysis of interaction in online focus groups
    Watson, Mohinder
    Peacock, Susi
    Jones, Derek
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERAPY AND REHABILITATION, 2006, 13 (12): : 551 - 557
  • [5] Unmoderated Focus Groups as a Tool for Inquiry
    Canipe, Martha M.
    [J]. QUALITATIVE REPORT, 2020, 25 (09) : 3361 - +
  • [6] A critical comparison of offline focus groups, online focus groups and e-Delphi
    Brueggen, Elisabeth
    Willems, Pieter
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2009, 51 (03) : 363 - 381
  • [7] Using Online Focus Groups to Explore Why Healthcare Professionals Belong to a Practice-Focused Virtual Community
    Rolls, Kaye
    Elliott, Doug
    Jackson, Debra
    Hansen, Maggie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2016, 15 (01):
  • [8] Development of a prehospital stroke mimic identification tool: a focus group study with healthcare professionals
    McClelland, G.
    Flynn, D.
    Rodgers, H.
    Price, C. I. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2017, 12 : 22 - 22
  • [9] Changing the focus of health professionals and policy-makers
    不详
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2020, 29 (02) : S37 - S40
  • [10] Asynchronous Online Focus Groups for Health Research: Case Study and Lessons Learned
    Gordon, Allegra R.
    Calzo, Jerel P.
    Eiduson, Rose
    Sharp, Kendall
    Silverstein, Scout
    Lopez, Ethan
    Thomson, Katharine
    Reisner, Sari L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2021, 20