Robust Gaussian Process Regression With Input Uncertainty: A PAC-Bayes Perspective

被引:2
|
作者
Liu, Tianyu [1 ]
Lu, Jie [1 ]
Yan, Zheng [1 ]
Zhang, Guangquan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Australian Artificial Intelligence Inst, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Training data; Noise measurement; Approximation algorithms; Gaussian processes; Uncertainty; Training; Standards; Bayesian learning; Gaussian process (GP); probably approximately correct (PAC)-Bayes bound; sparse approximation; statistical learning; BOUNDS;
D O I
10.1109/TCYB.2022.3191022
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The Gaussian process (GP) algorithm is considered as a powerful nonparametric-learning approach, which can provide uncertainty measurements on the predictions. The standard GP requires clearly observed data, unexpected perturbations in the input may lead to learned regression model mismatching. Besides, GP also suffers from the lack of good generalization performance guarantees. To deal with data uncertainty and provide a numerical generalization performance guarantee on the unknown data distribution, this article proposes a novel robust noisy input GP (NIGP) algorithm based on the probably approximately correct (PAC) Bayes theory. Furthermore, to reduce the computational complexity, we develop a sparse NIGP algorithm, and then develop a sparse PAC-Bayes NIGP approach. Compared with NIGP algorithms, instead of maximizing the marginal log likelihood, one can optimize the PAC-Bayes bound to pursue a tighter generalization error upper bound. Experiments verify that the NIGP algorithms can attain greater accuracy. Besides, the PAC-NIGP algorithms proposed herein can achieve both robust performance and improved generalization error upper bound in the face of both uncertain input and output data.
引用
收藏
页码:962 / 973
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Energy Calibration of Nonlinear Microcalorimeters with Uncertainty Estimates from Gaussian Process Regression
    J. W. Fowler
    B. K. Alpert
    G. C. O’Neil
    D. S. Swetz
    J. N. Ullom
    Journal of Low Temperature Physics, 2022, 209 : 1047 - 1054
  • [42] Multi-output local Gaussian process regression: Applications to uncertainty quantification
    Bilionis, Ilias
    Zabaras, Nicholas
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2012, 231 (17) : 5718 - 5746
  • [43] Robust Ground Segmentation for Autonomous Driving Using Sparse Gaussian Process Regression
    Jin, Xianjian
    Yang, Hang
    Yan, Zeyuan
    Wang, Qikang
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2021, 54 (10): : 437 - 442
  • [44] Estimating loss reserves using hierarchical Bayesian Gaussian process regression with input warping
    Lally, Nathan
    Hartman, Brian
    INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2018, 82 : 124 - 140
  • [45] System identification of ship dynamic model based on Gaussian process regression with input noise
    Xue, Yifan
    Liu, Yanjun
    Ji, Chen
    Xue, Gang
    Huang, Shuting
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2020, 216
  • [46] Pointwise uncertainty quantification for sparse variational Gaussian process regression with a Brownian motion prior
    Travis, Luke
    Ray, Kolyan
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 36 (NEURIPS 2023), 2023,
  • [47] Gaussian Process Regression for an Accurate and Uncertainty-Aware Winding Insulation Degradation Prediction
    Hashemi, Maliheh
    Stolz, Michael
    Watzenig, Daniel
    IEEE Access, 2024, 12 : 141752 - 141761
  • [48] Uncertainty-aware asynchronous scattered motion interpolation using Gaussian process regression
    Kocev, Bojan
    Hahn, Horst Karl
    Linsen, Lars
    Wells, William M.
    Kikinis, Ron
    COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 2019, 72 : 1 - 12
  • [49] Visual Mapping with Uncertainty for Correspondence-free Localization using Gaussian Process Regression
    Schairer, Timo
    Huhle, Benjamin
    Vorst, Philipp
    Schilling, Andreas
    Strasser, Wolfgang
    2011 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS, 2011, : 4229 - 4235
  • [50] Uncertainty-Aware Calibration of a Hot-Wire Anemometer With Gaussian Process Regression
    Garcia-Ruiz, Ruben A.
    Blanco-Claraco, Jose L.
    Lopez-Martinez, Javier
    Callejon-Ferre, Angel J.
    IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2019, 19 (17) : 7515 - 7524