Postgraduate Year 6 Versus Postgraduate Year 7 Neurosurgical Chief Year: A Survey of Residents and Program Directors

-OBJECTIVE: Recently, more neurosurgical residency programs have transitioned from a postgraduate year (PGY)-7 to a PGY-6 chief year. There has not been a national analysis of resident and program director perceptions regarding the timing of chief year conductance and its influence on overall program satisfaction. -METHODS: An online survey was distributed to all North American PGY 4e7 residents and program directors. Data regarding program size, protected research timing, chief year timing (PGY-6 vs. PGY-7), and resident and program director perceptions of the influence of neurosurgical chief year timing on program satisfaction and ability of residents to practice were recorded. Survey results were summa-rized descriptively. -RESULTS: A total of 134 respondents completed the survey. Thirty-five percent of respondents reported a recent program transition from a PGY-7 to PGY-6 chief year while 44% of respondents at programs conducting a PGY-7 chief year reported they were interested in transitioning to a PGY-6 chief year. The large majority (76%) of respondents at PGY-6 chief year programs stated they were overall satisfied with this. A large percentage of all respondents reported that a PGY-6 chief year provided increased op-portunity for subspecialty focus, enfolded fellowships and career planning. -CONCLUSIONS: Program directors and residents at PGY-6 chief year programs report a high level of satisfaction with close to half of those at PGY-7 programs desiring to make this transition. Most PGY-6 chief year respondents report that this model allows for greater subspecialty focus and career planning during the PGY-7 year.