Pantheon plus tomography and Hubble tension

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Deng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Inst Fis Corpuscular CSIC, Paterna 46980, Spain
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Natl Astron Observ, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
来源
EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C | 2023年 / 83卷 / 09期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11991-0
中图分类号
O412 [相对论、场论]; O572.2 [粒子物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
The recently released Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) sample, Pantheon+, is an updated version of Pantheon and has very important cosmological implications. To explore the origin of the enhanced constraining power and internal correlations of datasets in different redshifts, we perform a comprehensively tomographic analysis of the Pantheon+ sample without and with the Cepheid host distance calibration, respectively. Specifically, we take two binning methods to analyze the Pantheon+ sample, i.e., equal redshift interval and equal supernovae number for each bin. For the case of equal redshift interval, after dividing the sample to 10 bins, the first bin in the redshift range z is an element of [0.00122, 0.227235] dominates the constraining power of the whole sample. For the case of equal supernovae number, the first three low redshift bins prefer a large matter fraction Omega(m) and only the sixth bin gives a relatively low cosmic expansion rate H-0. For both binning methods, we find no obvious evidence of evolution of H-0 and Omega(m) at the 2 sigma confidence level. The inclusion of the SHOES calibration can significantly compress the parameter space of background dynamics of the universe in each bin. When not considering the calibration, combining the Pantheon+ sample with cosmic microwave background, baryon acoustic oscillations, cosmic chronometers, galaxy clustering and weak lensing data, we give the strongest 1 sigma constraint H-0 = 67.88 +/- 0.42kms(-1) Mpc(-1). However, the addition of the calibration leads to a global shift of the parameter space from the combined constraint and H-0 = 68.66 +/- 0.42 km s(-1) Mpc(-1), which is inconsistent with the Planck-2018 result at about 2 sigma confidence level.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cosmic birefringence test of the Hubble tension
    Capparelli, Ludovico M.
    Caldwell, Robert R.
    Melchiorri, Alessandro
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2020, 101 (12)
  • [32] Thermal friction as a solution to the Hubble tension
    Berghaus, Kim, V
    Karwal, Tanvi
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2020, 101 (08)
  • [33] Hubble Tension: The Evidence of New Physics
    Hu, Jian-Ping
    Wang, Fa-Yin
    UNIVERSE, 2023, 9 (02)
  • [34] The history of the Cosmos: Implications for the Hubble tension
    Storti, Riccardo C.
    OPEN ASTRONOMY, 2023, 32 (01)
  • [35] The Unsettled Number: Hubble's Tension
    Cervantes-Cota, Jorge L.
    Galindo-Uribarri, Salvador
    Smoot, George F.
    UNIVERSE, 2023, 9 (12)
  • [36] Hubble tension vs two flows
    Gurzadyan, V. G.
    Stepanian, A.
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS, 2021, 136 (02):
  • [37] Ultralight scalar decay and the Hubble tension
    Gonzalez, Mark
    Hertzberg, Mark P.
    Rompineve, Fabrizio
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2020, (10):
  • [38] Hubble tension vs two flows
    V. G. Gurzadyan
    A. Stepanian
    The European Physical Journal Plus, 136
  • [39] Surface tension: Accelerated expansion, coincidence problem & Hubble tension
    Ortiz, C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS D, 2020, 29 (16):
  • [40] The Hubble Tension and Early Dark Energy
    Kamionkowski, Marc
    Riess, Adam G.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF NUCLEAR AND PARTICLE SCIENCE, 2023, 73 : 153 - 180