Pantheon plus tomography and Hubble tension

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Deng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Inst Fis Corpuscular CSIC, Paterna 46980, Spain
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Natl Astron Observ, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
来源
EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C | 2023年 / 83卷 / 09期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11991-0
中图分类号
O412 [相对论、场论]; O572.2 [粒子物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
The recently released Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) sample, Pantheon+, is an updated version of Pantheon and has very important cosmological implications. To explore the origin of the enhanced constraining power and internal correlations of datasets in different redshifts, we perform a comprehensively tomographic analysis of the Pantheon+ sample without and with the Cepheid host distance calibration, respectively. Specifically, we take two binning methods to analyze the Pantheon+ sample, i.e., equal redshift interval and equal supernovae number for each bin. For the case of equal redshift interval, after dividing the sample to 10 bins, the first bin in the redshift range z is an element of [0.00122, 0.227235] dominates the constraining power of the whole sample. For the case of equal supernovae number, the first three low redshift bins prefer a large matter fraction Omega(m) and only the sixth bin gives a relatively low cosmic expansion rate H-0. For both binning methods, we find no obvious evidence of evolution of H-0 and Omega(m) at the 2 sigma confidence level. The inclusion of the SHOES calibration can significantly compress the parameter space of background dynamics of the universe in each bin. When not considering the calibration, combining the Pantheon+ sample with cosmic microwave background, baryon acoustic oscillations, cosmic chronometers, galaxy clustering and weak lensing data, we give the strongest 1 sigma constraint H-0 = 67.88 +/- 0.42kms(-1) Mpc(-1). However, the addition of the calibration leads to a global shift of the parameter space from the combined constraint and H-0 = 68.66 +/- 0.42 km s(-1) Mpc(-1), which is inconsistent with the Planck-2018 result at about 2 sigma confidence level.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Vacuum arbitrariness and the Hubble tension
    Kaya, Ali
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2020, 101 (08)
  • [22] JWST reinforces the Hubble tension
    Paul Woods
    Nature Astronomy, 2023, 7 : 1272 - 1272
  • [23] JWST reinforces the Hubble tension
    Woods, Paul
    NATURE ASTRONOMY, 2023, 7 (11) : 1272 - 1272
  • [24] Phantom Braneworld and the Hubble Tension
    Bag, Satadru
    Sahni, Varun
    Shafieloo, Arman
    Shtanov, Yuri
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 923 (02):
  • [25] Easing the Hubble constant tension
    Ambjorn, J.
    Watabiki, Y.
    MODERN PHYSICS LETTERS A, 2022, 37 (07)
  • [26] BAO plus BBN revisited - growing the Hubble tension with a 0.7 km/s/Mpc constraint
    Noriega, Hernan E.
    Aviles, Alejandro
    Fromenteau, Sebastien
    Vargas-Magana, Mariana
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2022, (11):
  • [27] Hubble constant by natural selection: Evolution chips in the Hubble tension
    Bernardo, R. C.
    Lee, Y. -R
    ASTRONOMY AND COMPUTING, 2023, 44
  • [28] Anisotropic distance ladder in Pantheon plus supernovae
    Mc Conville, Ruairi
    Colgain, Eoin o
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2023, 108 (12)
  • [29] Addressing the Hubble tension in Yukawa cosmology?
    Jusufi, Kimet
    Gonzalez, Esteban
    Leon, Genly
    PHYSICS OF THE DARK UNIVERSE, 2024, 46
  • [30] Resolving Hubble tension with the Milne model
    Vishwakarma, Ram Gopal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS D, 2020, 29 (14):