Pantheon plus tomography and Hubble tension

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Deng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Inst Fis Corpuscular CSIC, Paterna 46980, Spain
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Natl Astron Observ, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
来源
EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C | 2023年 / 83卷 / 09期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11991-0
中图分类号
O412 [相对论、场论]; O572.2 [粒子物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
The recently released Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) sample, Pantheon+, is an updated version of Pantheon and has very important cosmological implications. To explore the origin of the enhanced constraining power and internal correlations of datasets in different redshifts, we perform a comprehensively tomographic analysis of the Pantheon+ sample without and with the Cepheid host distance calibration, respectively. Specifically, we take two binning methods to analyze the Pantheon+ sample, i.e., equal redshift interval and equal supernovae number for each bin. For the case of equal redshift interval, after dividing the sample to 10 bins, the first bin in the redshift range z is an element of [0.00122, 0.227235] dominates the constraining power of the whole sample. For the case of equal supernovae number, the first three low redshift bins prefer a large matter fraction Omega(m) and only the sixth bin gives a relatively low cosmic expansion rate H-0. For both binning methods, we find no obvious evidence of evolution of H-0 and Omega(m) at the 2 sigma confidence level. The inclusion of the SHOES calibration can significantly compress the parameter space of background dynamics of the universe in each bin. When not considering the calibration, combining the Pantheon+ sample with cosmic microwave background, baryon acoustic oscillations, cosmic chronometers, galaxy clustering and weak lensing data, we give the strongest 1 sigma constraint H-0 = 67.88 +/- 0.42kms(-1) Mpc(-1). However, the addition of the calibration leads to a global shift of the parameter space from the combined constraint and H-0 = 68.66 +/- 0.42 km s(-1) Mpc(-1), which is inconsistent with the Planck-2018 result at about 2 sigma confidence level.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pantheon+ tomography and Hubble tension
    Deng Wang
    The European Physical Journal C, 83
  • [2] On the Hubble Constant Tension in the SNe Ia Pantheon Sample
    Dainotti, M. G.
    De Simone, B.
    Schiavone, T.
    Montani, G.
    Rinaldi, E.
    Lambiase, G.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 912 (02):
  • [3] Alleviating the Hubble-constant tension and the growth tension via a transition of absolute magnitude favored by the Pantheon plus sample
    Liu, Yang
    Yu, Hongwei
    Wu, Puxun
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2024, 110 (02)
  • [4] Potential signature of a quadrupolar hubble expansion in Pantheon plus supernovae
    Cowell, Jessica A.
    Dhawan, Suhail
    Macpherson, Hayley J.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2023, 526 (01) : 1482 - 1494
  • [5] The BAO plus BBN take on the Hubble tension
    Schoeneberg, Nils
    Lesgourgues, Julien
    Hooper, Deanna C.
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2019, (10):
  • [6] Hubble tension
    Huterer, Dragan
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS, 2023, 138 (11):
  • [7] Hubble tension
    Dragan Huterer
    The European Physical Journal Plus, 138
  • [8] Detection of gamma-ray burst Amati relation based on Hubble data set and Pantheon plus samples
    Han, Yufen
    Gao, Jiaze
    Liu, Gang
    Xu, Lixin
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C, 2024, 84 (09):
  • [9] Hubble tension tightens
    不详
    ASTRONOMY & GEOPHYSICS, 2023, 64 (06) : 11 - 11
  • [10] A new parametrization of Hubble function and Hubble tension
    He, Tong-Yu
    Yin, Jia-Jun
    Wang, Zhen-Yu
    Han, Zhan-Wen
    Yang, Rong-Jia
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2024, (09):