Predicting the attention of others

被引:2
|
作者
Ziman, Kirsten [1 ]
Kimmel, Sarah C. [1 ]
Farrell, Kathryn T. [1 ]
Graziano, Michael S. A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Princeton Neurosci Inst, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Dept Psychol, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
attention; eye movement; predictive models; social cognition; social attention; BIOLOGICAL MOTION; EYE-MOVEMENTS; VISUAL-ATTENTION; OBSERVERS TASK; GAZE; PERCEPTION; RESPONSES; COGNITION; HUMANS; YARBUS;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.2307584120
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
As social animals, people are highly sensitive to the attention of others. Seeing someone else gaze at an object automatically draws one's own attention to that object. Monitoring the attention of others aids in reconstructing their emotions, beliefs, and intentions and may play a crucial role in social alignment. Recently, however, it has been suggested that the human brain constructs a predictive model of other people's attention that is far more involved than a moment-by-moment monitoring of gaze direction. The hypothesized model learns the statistical patterns in other people's attention and extrapolates how attention is likely to move. Here, we tested the hypothesis of a predictive model of attention. Subjects saw movies of attention displayed as a bright spot shifting around a scene. Subjects were able to correctly distinguish natural attention sequences (based on eye tracking of prior participants) from altered sequences (e.g., played backward or in a scrambled order). Even when the attention spot moved around a blank background, subjects could distinguish natural from scrambled sequences, suggesting a sensitivity to the spatial-temporal statistics of attention. Subjects also showed an ability to recognize the attention patterns of different individuals. These results suggest that people possess a sophisticated model of the normal statistics of attention and can identify deviations from the model. Monitoring attention is therefore more than simply registering where someone else's eyes are pointing. It involves predictive modeling, which may contribute to our remarkable social ability to predict the mind states and behavior of others.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Salience driven attention is pivotal to understanding others' intentions
    Rijpma, Myrthe G.
    Shdo, Suzanne M.
    Shany-Ur, Tal
    Toller, Gianina
    Kramer, Joel H.
    Miller, Bruce L.
    Rankin, Katherine P.
    COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 38 (01) : 88 - 106
  • [32] Racial disparities in observers' attention to and estimations of others' pain
    Kissi, Ama
    Van Ryckeghem, Dimitri M. L.
    Mende-Siedlecki, Peter
    Hirsh, Adam
    Vervoort, Tine
    PAIN, 2022, 163 (04) : 745 - 752
  • [33] Pain and related suffering reduce attention toward others
    Gonzalez-Roldan, Ana Maria
    Bustan, Smadar
    Kamping, Sandra
    Flor, Herta
    Anton, Fernand
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2023, 23 (08) : 873 - 885
  • [34] Infants use attention but not emotions to predict others' actions
    Vaish, Amrisha
    Woodward, Amanda
    INFANT BEHAVIOR & DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 33 (01): : 79 - 87
  • [35] PREDICTING ANTENATAL CLASS ATTENDANCE - ATTITUDES OF SELF AND OTHERS
    MICHIE, S
    MARTEAU, TM
    KIDD, J
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 1992, 7 (03) : 225 - 234
  • [36] Beyond simulation? Neural mechanisms for predicting the actions of others
    Natalie Sebanz
    Chris Frith
    Nature Neuroscience, 2004, 7 : 5 - 6
  • [37] The Role of(Dis)similarity in (Mis)predicting Others' Preferences
    Barasz, Kate
    Kim, Tami
    John, Leslie K.
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2016, 53 (04) : 597 - 607
  • [38] Beyond simulation? Neural mechanisms for predicting the actions of others
    Sebanz, N
    Frith, C
    NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 7 (01) : 5 - 6
  • [39] PREDICTING ONES OWN AND OTHERS 16 PF SCORES
    FURNHAM, A
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH & REVIEWS, 1989, 8 (01): : 30 - 37
  • [40] Predicting others’ knowledge: Knowledge estimation as cue utilization
    Jonathan G. Tullis
    Memory & Cognition, 2018, 46 : 1360 - 1375