Comparison between time-domain and frequency-domain Bayesian inferences to inspiral-merger-ringdown gravitational-wave signals

被引:3
|
作者
Wang, Hai-Tian [1 ]
Shao, Lijing [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Kavli Inst Astron & Astrophys, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Natl Astron Observ, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 新加坡国家研究基金会; 英国科学技术设施理事会; 澳大利亚研究理事会; 日本学术振兴会; 中国国家自然科学基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
BLACK-HOLE;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevD.109.043027
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Time -domain (TD) Bayesian inference is important in ringdown analysis for gravitational wave (GW) astronomy. The validity of this method has been well studied by Isi and Farr [arXiv:2202.02941]. Using GW190521 as an example, we study the TD method in detail by comparing it with the frequency -domain (FD) method as a complement to previous study. We argue that the autocovariance function (ACF) should be calculated from the inverse fast Fourier transform of the power spectral density (PSD), which is usually estimated by the Welch method. In addition, the total duration of the GW data that are used to estimate the PSD and the slice duration of the truncated ACF should be long enough. Only when these conditions are fully satisfied can the TD method be considered sufficiently equivalent to the FD method.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] In-vitro comparison of time-domain, frequency-domain and wavelet ultrasound parameters in diagnostics of cartilage degeneration
    Kaleva, E.
    Saarakkala, S.
    Toyras, J.
    Nieminen, H. J.
    Jurvelin, J. S.
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 34 (01): : 155 - 159
  • [42] RESPONSES OF A FLOATING RECTANGULAR CAISSON TO REGULAR WAVES: A COMPARISON OF MEASUREMENTS WITH TIME-DOMAIN AND FREQUENCY-DOMAIN SIMULATIONS
    Huang, Zhenhua
    Liu, Chunrong
    Kurniawan, Adi
    Tan, Soon Keat
    Nah, Edwin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ASIAN AND PACIFIC COASTS, VOL 4, 2010, : 200 - +
  • [43] ESTIMATION AND CORRECTION OF EOG-EEG TRANSFER - NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TIME-DOMAIN AND FREQUENCY-DOMAIN METHODS
    KENEMANS, JL
    MOLENAAR, PCM
    VERBATEN, MN
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 25 (04) : 462 - 462
  • [44] WAVE-ORIENTED DATA-PROCESSING FOR FREQUENCY-DOMAIN AND TIME-DOMAIN SCATTERING BY NONUNIFORM TRUNCATED ARRAYS
    CARIN, L
    FELSEN, LB
    IEEE ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION MAGAZINE, 1994, 36 (03) : 29 - 43
  • [45] Blind source separation of acoustic signals based on multistage ICA combining frequency-domain ICA and time-domain ICA
    Nishikawa, T
    Saruwatari, H
    Shikano, K
    IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON FUNDAMENTALS OF ELECTRONICS COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2003, E86A (04) : 846 - 858
  • [46] COMPARISON BETWEEN TIME DOMAIN AND FREQUENCY-DOMAIN COMPUTER-PROGRAM FOR BUILDING ENERGY ANALYSIS
    HAGHIGHAT, F
    ATHIENITIS, A
    COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN, 1988, 20 (09) : 525 - 532
  • [47] Comparison of signal-averaged electrocardiograms with different levels of noise: Time-domain, frequency-domain, and spectrotemporal analysis
    Maounis, TN
    Kyrozi, E
    Chiladakis, I
    Vassilikos, VP
    Manolis, AS
    Cokkinos, DV
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 20 (03): : 671 - 682
  • [48] Nonlinear modeling of structures with bolted joints: A comparison of two approaches based on a time-domain and frequency-domain solver
    Lacayo, Robert
    Pesaresi, Luca
    Gross, Johann
    Fochler, Daniel
    Armand, Jason
    Salles, Loic
    Schwingshackl, Christoph
    Allen, Matthew
    Brake, Matthew
    MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2019, 114 : 413 - 438
  • [49] Comparison of Vibration Characteristics of Floating Slab Track in Rail Transit Viaduct with Time-Domain and Frequency-Domain Models
    Song, Qingyuan
    Li, Qi
    NOISE AND VIBRATION MITIGATION FOR RAIL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, IWRN14, 2022, 2024, : 793 - 801
  • [50] Critical comparison between time- and frequency-domain relaxation functions
    Snyder, CR
    Mopsik, FI
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1999, 60 (02): : 984 - 990