Comparison between time-domain and frequency-domain Bayesian inferences to inspiral-merger-ringdown gravitational-wave signals

被引:3
|
作者
Wang, Hai-Tian [1 ]
Shao, Lijing [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Kavli Inst Astron & Astrophys, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Natl Astron Observ, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 新加坡国家研究基金会; 英国科学技术设施理事会; 澳大利亚研究理事会; 日本学术振兴会; 中国国家自然科学基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
BLACK-HOLE;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevD.109.043027
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Time -domain (TD) Bayesian inference is important in ringdown analysis for gravitational wave (GW) astronomy. The validity of this method has been well studied by Isi and Farr [arXiv:2202.02941]. Using GW190521 as an example, we study the TD method in detail by comparing it with the frequency -domain (FD) method as a complement to previous study. We argue that the autocovariance function (ACF) should be calculated from the inverse fast Fourier transform of the power spectral density (PSD), which is usually estimated by the Welch method. In addition, the total duration of the GW data that are used to estimate the PSD and the slice duration of the truncated ACF should be long enough. Only when these conditions are fully satisfied can the TD method be considered sufficiently equivalent to the FD method.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of time-domain and frequency-domain control schemes for shunt active filters
    Sonnenschein, M
    Weinhold, M
    EUROPEAN TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL POWER, 1999, 9 (01): : 5 - 16
  • [22] COMPARISON OF ADAPTIVE FILTERING IN TIME-DOMAIN, TRANSFORM-DOMAIN AND FREQUENCY-DOMAIN - AN ELECTROGASTROGRAPHIC STUDY
    CHEN, JD
    LIN, ZY
    ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1994, 22 (04) : 423 - 431
  • [23] On Relationship Between Time-Domain and Frequency-Domain Disturbance Observers and Its Applications
    Su, Jinya
    Chen, Wen-Hua
    Yang, Jun
    JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2016, 138 (09):
  • [24] SAGUARO: Time-domain Infrastructure for the Fourth Gravitational-wave Observing Run and Beyond
    Hosseinzadeh, Griffin
    Paterson, Kerry
    Rastinejad, Jillian C.
    Shrestha, Manisha
    Daly, Philip N.
    Lundquist, Michael J.
    Sand, David J.
    Fong, Wen-fai
    Bostroem, K. Azalee
    Hall, Saarah
    Wyatt, Samuel D.
    Gibbs, Alex R.
    Christensen, Eric
    Lindstrom, William
    Nation, Jonathan
    Chatelain, Joseph
    Mccully, Curtis
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 964 (01):
  • [25] NONLINEAR RESPONSE FUNCTION FOR TIME-DOMAIN AND FREQUENCY-DOMAIN 4-WAVE-MIXING
    MUKAMEL, S
    LORING, RF
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA B-OPTICAL PHYSICS, 1986, 3 (04) : 595 - 606
  • [26] A comparison of time-domain and frequency-domain approaches to ultrasonic velocity measurement in trabecular bone
    Nicholson, PHF
    Lowet, G
    Langton, CM
    Dequeker, J
    VanderPerre, G
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1996, 41 (11): : 2421 - 2435
  • [27] Performance Comparison of Time-Domain and Frequency-Domain Beamforming Techniques for Sensor Array Processing
    Hamid, Umar
    Qamar, Rahim Ali
    Waqas, Kashif
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2014 11TH INTERNATIONAL BHURBAN CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SCIENCES & TECHNOLOGY (IBCAST), 2014, : 379 - 385
  • [28] Intermolecular spectral densities of liquids: A quantitative comparison of time-domain and frequency-domain techniques
    Cong, P
    Simon, JD
    She, CY
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 104 (03): : 962 - 966
  • [29] Frequency-domain P-approximant filters for time-truncated inspiral gravitational wave signals from compact binaries -: art. no. 084036
    Damour, T
    Iyer, BR
    Sathyaprakash, BS
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2000, 62 (08) : 34
  • [30] Influence of current and seabed friction on mooring cable response: Comparison between time-domain and frequency-domain analysis
    Liu, YG
    Bergdahl, L
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 1997, 19 (11) : 945 - 953