Comparison between time-domain and frequency-domain Bayesian inferences to inspiral-merger-ringdown gravitational-wave signals

被引:3
|
作者
Wang, Hai-Tian [1 ]
Shao, Lijing [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Kavli Inst Astron & Astrophys, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Natl Astron Observ, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 新加坡国家研究基金会; 英国科学技术设施理事会; 澳大利亚研究理事会; 日本学术振兴会; 中国国家自然科学基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
BLACK-HOLE;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevD.109.043027
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Time -domain (TD) Bayesian inference is important in ringdown analysis for gravitational wave (GW) astronomy. The validity of this method has been well studied by Isi and Farr [arXiv:2202.02941]. Using GW190521 as an example, we study the TD method in detail by comparing it with the frequency -domain (FD) method as a complement to previous study. We argue that the autocovariance function (ACF) should be calculated from the inverse fast Fourier transform of the power spectral density (PSD), which is usually estimated by the Welch method. In addition, the total duration of the GW data that are used to estimate the PSD and the slice duration of the truncated ACF should be long enough. Only when these conditions are fully satisfied can the TD method be considered sufficiently equivalent to the FD method.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A study of the inspiral-merger-ringdown consistency test with gravitational- wave signals from compact binaries in eccentric orbits
    Shaikh, Md Arif
    Bhat, Sajad A.
    Kapadia, Shasvath J.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2024, 110 (02)
  • [2] Comparison of frequency measurement between time-domain and frequency-domain in DSO
    Wei, J
    Chen, CL
    2005 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS, CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS: VOL 1: COMMUNICATION THEORY AND SYSTEMS, 2005, : 808 - 811
  • [3] Frequency-domain analysis of gravitational-wave memory waveforms
    Valencia, Jorge
    Tenorio, Rodrigo
    Rossello-Sastre, Maria
    Husa, Sascha
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2024, 110 (12)
  • [4] Frequency-domain distribution of astrophysical gravitational-wave backgrounds
    Ginat, Yonadav Barry
    Reischke, Robert
    Rapoport, Ivan
    Desjacques, Vincent
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2024, 109 (08)
  • [5] Comparison between a time-domain and a frequency-domain system for optical tomography
    Nissila, Ilkka
    Lipiainen, Lauri
    Hebden, Jeremy C.
    Katila, Toivo
    Jennions, David
    Heino, Jenni
    Schweiger, Martin
    Kotilahti, Kalle
    Noponen, Tommi
    Gibson, Adam
    Jarvenpaa, Seppo
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2006, 11 (06)
  • [6] Comparison between Time-domain and Frequency-domain Measurement Techniques for Mantle Shear-wave Attenuation
    J. Bhattacharyya
    pure and applied geophysics, 1998, 153 : 399 - 417
  • [7] Comparison between time-domain and frequency-domain measurement techniques for mantle shear-wave attenuation
    Bhattacharyya, J
    PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 1998, 153 (2-4) : 399 - 417
  • [8] Bayesian optimal classification of metallic objects: A comparison of time-domain and frequency-domain EMI performance
    Gao, P
    Collins, L
    Carin, L
    DETECTION AND REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR MINES AND MINELIKE TARGETS V, PTS 1 AND 2, 2000, 4038 : 25 - 35
  • [9] An analysis and comparison of frequency-domain and time-domain input shaping
    Pao, LY
    Cutforth, CF
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1998 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 1998, : 3072 - 3074
  • [10] Comparison of frequency-domain and time-domain fluorescence lifetime tomography
    Kumar, Anand T. N.
    Raymond, Scott B.
    Bacskai, Brian J.
    Boas, David A.
    OPTICS LETTERS, 2008, 33 (05) : 470 - 472