Economic-ecological services and their trade-offs or synergies of agricultural landscapes in Xiangxi, central China

被引:0
|
作者
Xiang, Hui [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ Arts & Sci, Coll Geog & Tourism, Changde 415000, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Univ, Inst Green Low Carbon Dev, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China
关键词
Ecosystem services; Agricultural landscapes; Xiangxi; Trade-offs; Synergies; MAPPING ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; LAND-USE; MOUNTAIN REGIONS; BASIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19145
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The scarcity of agricultural ecosystem services (ESs) caused by land use changes has become increasingly prominent, and the negative effects of agricultural production on ecosystems have been a constant concern. In this work, the geographic information system mapping method, the agricultural product supply (AS) model and InVEST model were applied to assess the economic and ecological services of agricultural landscapes. The interlinkages among them in Xiangxi were explored, a mountainous area in central China. The major conclusions drawn were as follows.1) From 2000 to 2020, the economic services (ESs1) of agricultural landscapes in Xiangxi increased by 96.6667%, and those of grain yield per ha (X1), cash crop output value per ha (X2), forestry output value per ha (X3), meat production per capita in rural areas (X4), and fishery output per ha (X5) were 39.0405%, 510.8462%, 297.6807%, 64.5947%, and 194.0348%, respectively. The spatial distribution of X1, X2, X3, X4, and X5 changed considerably, and the major influencing factors were human elements. 2) Ecological services (ESs2) increased by 5.13%, and those of carbon storage (CS, X6), water conservation (WC, X7), and N content in water (X8) were 1.0897%, 13.5808%, and -0.7406%, respectively. The distribution of X6, X7, and X8 was nearly unchanged and primarily influenced by natural factors 3) The relationship between ESs1 and ESs2 was not ideal. The dominant relationships between AS and CS were trade-offs, those between AS and WC were synergies, and those between AS and water purification were trade-offs. 4) The following suggestions are proposed: promote afforestation and vegetation protection policies, implement the best agricultural policies, increase investment in water conservation projects, adjust agricultural scale, and control the usage of agricultural chemicals. For the surrounding areas of more developed regions, strict environmental measures and agricultural policies are necessary. The methods used in this study are novel and can provide methodological references for similar studies. Moreover, it may offer useful suggestions for agricultural resource management and contribute to ecological civilization construction.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Exploring ecosystem services trade-offs in agricultural landscapes with a multi-objective programming approach
    Groot, Jeroen C. J.
    Yalew, Seleshi G.
    Rossing, Walter A. H.
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2018, 172 : 29 - 36
  • [42] Trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Delta, China: response to urbanizing variation
    Chen, Sha
    Li, Guan
    Zhuo, Yuefei
    Xu, Zhongguo
    Ye, Yanmei
    Thorn, Jessica P. R.
    Marchant, Robert
    URBAN ECOSYSTEMS, 2022, 25 (01) : 313 - 328
  • [43] The Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Jiulianshan National Nature Reserve in Jiangxi Province, China
    Feng, Jiayuan
    Chen, Fusheng
    Tang, Fangran
    Wang, Fangchao
    Liang, Kuan
    He, Lingyun
    Huang, Chao
    FORESTS, 2022, 13 (03):
  • [44] Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: Trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape
    Turner, Katrine Grace
    Odgaard, Mette Vestergaard
    Bocher, Peder K.
    Dalgaard, Tommy
    Svenning, Jens-Christian
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2014, 125 : 89 - 104
  • [45] Trade-offs and synergies between livestock production and other ecosystem services
    Accatino, Francesco
    Tonda, Alberto
    Dross, Camille
    Leger, Francois
    Tichit, Muriel
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2019, 168 : 58 - 72
  • [46] Exploring Trade-Offs and Synergies in Social-Ecological System Services across Ecological Engineering Impact Regions: Insights from South China Karst
    Luo, Lu
    Xiong, Kangning
    Chen, Yi
    Zhang, Wenfang
    Li, Yongyao
    Wang, Dezhi
    LAND, 2024, 13 (09)
  • [47] Optimization of the Ecological Network Structure Based on Scenario Simulation and Trade-Offs/Synergies among Ecosystem Services in Nanping
    Wang, Zixuan
    Xiao, Ling
    Yan, Haiming
    Qi, Yuanjing
    Jiang, Qun'ou
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (20)
  • [48] AN INTEGRATED ADAPTATION AND MITIGATION FRAMEWORK FOR DEVELOPING AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH: SYNERGIES AND TRADE-OFFS
    Jarvis, Andy
    Lau, Charlotte
    Cook, Simon
    Wollenberg, Eva
    Hansen, James
    Bonilla, Osana
    Challinor, Andy
    EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2011, 47 (02) : 185 - 203
  • [49] Spatiotemporal patterns of urban expansion and trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services in urban agglomerations of China
    Tian, Peng
    Liu, Yongchao
    Li, Jialin
    Pu, Ruiliang
    Cao, Luodan
    Zhang, Haitao
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 148
  • [50] Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Karst Area of China Driven by Grain-for-Green Program
    Wang Xiaofeng
    Zhang Xinrong
    Feng Xiaoming
    Liu Shirong
    Yin Lichang
    Chen Yongzhe
    CHINESE GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 30 (01) : 101 - 114