Economic-ecological services and their trade-offs or synergies of agricultural landscapes in Xiangxi, central China

被引:0
|
作者
Xiang, Hui [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ Arts & Sci, Coll Geog & Tourism, Changde 415000, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Univ, Inst Green Low Carbon Dev, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China
关键词
Ecosystem services; Agricultural landscapes; Xiangxi; Trade-offs; Synergies; MAPPING ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; LAND-USE; MOUNTAIN REGIONS; BASIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19145
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The scarcity of agricultural ecosystem services (ESs) caused by land use changes has become increasingly prominent, and the negative effects of agricultural production on ecosystems have been a constant concern. In this work, the geographic information system mapping method, the agricultural product supply (AS) model and InVEST model were applied to assess the economic and ecological services of agricultural landscapes. The interlinkages among them in Xiangxi were explored, a mountainous area in central China. The major conclusions drawn were as follows.1) From 2000 to 2020, the economic services (ESs1) of agricultural landscapes in Xiangxi increased by 96.6667%, and those of grain yield per ha (X1), cash crop output value per ha (X2), forestry output value per ha (X3), meat production per capita in rural areas (X4), and fishery output per ha (X5) were 39.0405%, 510.8462%, 297.6807%, 64.5947%, and 194.0348%, respectively. The spatial distribution of X1, X2, X3, X4, and X5 changed considerably, and the major influencing factors were human elements. 2) Ecological services (ESs2) increased by 5.13%, and those of carbon storage (CS, X6), water conservation (WC, X7), and N content in water (X8) were 1.0897%, 13.5808%, and -0.7406%, respectively. The distribution of X6, X7, and X8 was nearly unchanged and primarily influenced by natural factors 3) The relationship between ESs1 and ESs2 was not ideal. The dominant relationships between AS and CS were trade-offs, those between AS and WC were synergies, and those between AS and water purification were trade-offs. 4) The following suggestions are proposed: promote afforestation and vegetation protection policies, implement the best agricultural policies, increase investment in water conservation projects, adjust agricultural scale, and control the usage of agricultural chemicals. For the surrounding areas of more developed regions, strict environmental measures and agricultural policies are necessary. The methods used in this study are novel and can provide methodological references for similar studies. Moreover, it may offer useful suggestions for agricultural resource management and contribute to ecological civilization construction.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in Costa Rica
    Locatelli, Bruno
    Imbach, Pablo
    Wunder, Sven
    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 41 (01) : 27 - 36
  • [32] Perceived ecosystem services synergies, trade-offs, and bundles in European high nature value farming landscapes
    Tobias Plieninger
    Mario Torralba
    Tibor Hartel
    Nora Fagerholm
    Landscape Ecology, 2019, 34 : 1565 - 1581
  • [33] Assessing levels, trade-offs and synergies of landscape services in the Iranian province of Qazvin: towards sustainable landscapes
    Asef Darvishi
    Maryam Yousefi
    Naghmeh Mobarghaee Dinan
    Per Angelstam
    Landscape Ecology, 2022, 37 : 305 - 327
  • [34] Assessing levels, trade-offs and synergies of landscape services in the Iranian province of Qazvin: towards sustainable landscapes
    Darvishi, Asef
    Yousefi, Maryam
    Dinan, Naghmeh Mobarghaee
    Angelstam, Per
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2022, 37 (01) : 305 - 327
  • [35] Simulating the Impact of Future Climate Change and Ecological Restoration on Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Two Ecological Shelters and Three Belts in China
    Wang, Liang-Jie
    Ma, Shuai
    Qiao, Yong-Peng
    Zhang, Jin-Chi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (21) : 1 - 26
  • [36] The Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Pinus massoniana Lamb. Plantations in Guangxi, China
    Mo, Rongjian
    Wang, Yongqi
    Mo, Yanhua
    Li, Lu
    Ma, Jiangming
    FORESTS, 2023, 14 (03):
  • [37] The impact of large-scale ecological restoration projects on trade-offs/ synergies and clusters of ecosystem services
    Lyu, Feinan
    Tang, Jinqi
    Olhnuud, Aruhan
    Hao, Fan
    Gong, Cheng
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 365
  • [38] Trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Delta, China: response to urbanizing variation
    Sha Chen
    Guan Li
    Yuefei Zhuo
    Zhongguo Xu
    Yanmei Ye
    Jessica P. R. Thorn
    Robert Marchant
    Urban Ecosystems, 2022, 25 : 313 - 328
  • [39] Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Ecosystem Services and Trade-Offs/Synergies in Wujiang River Basin, China
    Yang, Junyi
    Li, Junsheng
    Fu, Gang
    Liu, Bo
    Pan, Libo
    Hao, Haojing
    Guan, Xiao
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (16)
  • [40] Variations in the Value and Trade-Offs/Synergies of Ecosystem Services on Topographic Gradients in Qinghai Province, China
    Ma, Xiaofan
    Zhang, Haifeng
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (23)