Integrating Implementation Science in a Quality and Patient Safety Improvement Learning Collaborative: Essential Ingredients and Impact

被引:2
|
作者
Jeffs, Lianne [1 ]
Bruno, Frances [2 ]
Zeng, Rui Lin [2 ]
Schonewille, Noah [3 ]
Kinder, Kim [4 ]
De Souza, Gina [5 ]
D'Arpino, Maryanne [5 ]
Baker, G. Ross [6 ]
机构
[1] Sinai Hlth, Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Sinai Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] EY, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Healthcare Excellence Canada, Hlth Innovat Programs, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Healthcare Excellence Canada, Programs & Syst Transformat, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
HEALTH SYSTEM; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.02.001
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is a current lack of research exploring the contextual factors of why and how quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) work. To this end, a mixed methods study was undertaken to improve our understanding of what works for whom and in what context among participants in a nationwide Canadian QIC. Methods: The authors used a mixed methods approach consisting of a written survey and 30-to-45-minute telephone interviews with collaborative team members, coaches, and senior leaders of participating safety improvement project (SIP) organizations to identify the essential elements of an integrated approach involving implementation science/knowledge translation, quality improvement (QI), patient safety, and collaborative learning/networked approach to enhancing safety and quality and building implementation capabilities. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Interview data were analyzed by three team members using thematic analysis and development of an emergent coding schema. Results: Four themes emerged as the essential elements: (1) integrating implementation science into the QI/patient safety learning collaborative; (2) reinforcing of and opening eyes to implementation science by an expert implementation specialist; (3) valuing the sense making and strategies shared by coaches; and (4) experiencing challenges to implementation amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic. Teams also reported improvements in teamwork and patient outcomes as a result of participating in the QIC. Conclusion: This study's findings provide deeper insight into the "essential ingredients" (expert implementation specialist, coaches) grounded in an integrated approach that drew from QI, patient safety, and implementation science. Organizations can use the key learnings on how best to implement quality and safety projects by leveraging the sense making of the expert implementation specialist and coaches in an integrated networked learning approach.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 264
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrating Implementation Science with Quality Improvement to Improve Perinatal Outcomes
    Callaghan-Koru, Jennifer
    Farzin, Azadeh
    Ridout, Erick
    Curran, Geoffrey
    CLINICS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2023, 50 (02) : 343 - 361
  • [2] Essential ingredients for success in a quality improvement program
    House, K
    Harrell, D
    STC's 52nd Annual Conference Proceedings: EXPERIENCING TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION, 2005, : 359 - 363
  • [3] Quality improvement implementation and hospital performance on patient safety indicators
    Weiner, BJ
    Alexander, JA
    Baker, LC
    Shortell, SM
    Becker, M
    MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2006, 63 (01) : 29 - 57
  • [4] Strategies for sustaining a quality improvement collaborative and its patient safety gains
    Parand, Anam
    Benn, Jonathan
    Burnett, Susan
    Pinto, Anna
    Vincent, Charles
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2012, 24 (04) : 380 - 390
  • [5] Improved Birth Outcomes With Implementation of a Perinatal Quality and Patient Safety Collaborative
    Walker, Raquel
    JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2014, 43 : S53 - S54
  • [6] Implementing patient safety and quality improvement in dermatology. Part 2: Quality improvement science
    Marsch, Amanda
    Khodosh, Rita
    Porter, Martina
    Raad, Jason H.
    Samimi, Sara
    Schultz, Brittney
    Strowd, Lindsay Chaney
    Vera, Laura
    Wong, Emily
    Smith, Gideon P.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2023, 89 (04) : 657 - 667
  • [7] Human factors and ergonomics and quality improvement science: integrating approaches for safety in healthcare
    Hignett, Sue
    Jones, Emma Leanne
    Miller, Duncan
    Wolf, Laurie
    Modi, Chetna
    Shahzad, Muhammad Waseem
    Buckle, Peter
    Banerjee, Jaydip
    Catchpole, Ken
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2015, 24 (04) : 250 - 254
  • [8] Leadership, safety climate, and continuous quality improvement: Impact on process quality and patient safety
    McFadden, Kathleen L.
    Stock, Gregory N.
    Gowen, Charles R., III
    HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2015, 40 (01) : 24 - 34
  • [9] A learning collaborative for implementation science in neuroscience
    Silberberg, D.
    Ewart-Pierce, E.
    Sturke, R.
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 357 : E500 - E501
  • [10] Integrating Ethics and Patient Safety: The Role of Clinical Ethics Consultants in Quality Improvement
    Opel, Douglas J.
    Brownstein, Dena
    Diekema, Douglas S.
    Wilfond, Benjamin S.
    Pearlman, Robert A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ETHICS, 2009, 20 (03): : 220 - 226