Integrating Implementation Science in a Quality and Patient Safety Improvement Learning Collaborative: Essential Ingredients and Impact

被引:2
|
作者
Jeffs, Lianne [1 ]
Bruno, Frances [2 ]
Zeng, Rui Lin [2 ]
Schonewille, Noah [3 ]
Kinder, Kim [4 ]
De Souza, Gina [5 ]
D'Arpino, Maryanne [5 ]
Baker, G. Ross [6 ]
机构
[1] Sinai Hlth, Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Sinai Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] EY, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Healthcare Excellence Canada, Hlth Innovat Programs, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Healthcare Excellence Canada, Programs & Syst Transformat, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
HEALTH SYSTEM; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.02.001
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is a current lack of research exploring the contextual factors of why and how quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) work. To this end, a mixed methods study was undertaken to improve our understanding of what works for whom and in what context among participants in a nationwide Canadian QIC. Methods: The authors used a mixed methods approach consisting of a written survey and 30-to-45-minute telephone interviews with collaborative team members, coaches, and senior leaders of participating safety improvement project (SIP) organizations to identify the essential elements of an integrated approach involving implementation science/knowledge translation, quality improvement (QI), patient safety, and collaborative learning/networked approach to enhancing safety and quality and building implementation capabilities. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Interview data were analyzed by three team members using thematic analysis and development of an emergent coding schema. Results: Four themes emerged as the essential elements: (1) integrating implementation science into the QI/patient safety learning collaborative; (2) reinforcing of and opening eyes to implementation science by an expert implementation specialist; (3) valuing the sense making and strategies shared by coaches; and (4) experiencing challenges to implementation amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic. Teams also reported improvements in teamwork and patient outcomes as a result of participating in the QIC. Conclusion: This study's findings provide deeper insight into the "essential ingredients" (expert implementation specialist, coaches) grounded in an integrated approach that drew from QI, patient safety, and implementation science. Organizations can use the key learnings on how best to implement quality and safety projects by leveraging the sense making of the expert implementation specialist and coaches in an integrated networked learning approach.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 264
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Integrating Continuing Education, Quality Improvement, Faculty Development, Knowledge Translation, and Patient Safety in JCEHP
    Kitto, Simon
    JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2018, 38 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [32] A National Vision for Quality Improvement in Canadian NephrologyThe Canadian Nephrology Quality Improvement and Implementation Science Collaborative (CN-QUIS): An Opinion Piece
    More, Keigan M.
    Levin, Adeera
    Silver, Samuel A.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY HEALTH AND DISEASE, 2020, 7
  • [33] Impact of a quality improvement plan on the validation of drug prescriptions on the safety of the hospitalised patient
    Rosas Espinoza, C.
    Caro Teller, J. M.
    Arrieta Loitegui, M.
    Lazaro Cebas, A.
    Ortiz Perez, S.
    Jimenez Cerezo, M. J.
    Ferrari Piquero, J. M.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE QUALITY RESEARCH, 2020, 35 (05) : 313 - 318
  • [34] Impact of a Formal Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Curriculum: A Prospective, Controlled Trial
    Jamal, Nausheen
    Bowe, Sarah N.
    Brenner, Michael J.
    Balakrishnan, Karthik
    Bent, John P.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2019, 129 (05): : 1100 - 1106
  • [35] Student outcomes of an international learning collaborative to develop patient safety and quality competencies in nursing
    Sanford, Julie
    Argenbright, Christine
    Sherwood, Gwen
    Jordan, Portia J.
    Jimenez-Herrera, Maria F.
    Bengtsson, Mariette
    Moriyama, Michiko
    Peng Lui, Lee
    McDonald, Maria
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN NURSING, 2021, 26 (1-2) : 81 - 94
  • [36] Integrating quality and safety science in nursing education and practice
    Sherwood, Gwen
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN NURSING, 2011, 16 (03) : 226 - 240
  • [37] Implementation of programmatic quality and the impact on safety
    Huls, Dale T.
    Meehan, Kevin M.
    Proceedings of the First IAASS Conference on Space Safety, a New Beginning, 2005, 599 : 33 - 41
  • [38] The Science of Safety Improvement: Learning While Doing
    Clancy, Carolyn M.
    Berwick, Donald M.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 154 (10) : 699 - +
  • [39] EFFECTS OF A NATIONAL QUALITY IMPROVEMENT COLLABORATIVE ON ABCDEF BUNDLE IMPLEMENTATION
    Balas, Michele C.
    Tan, Alai
    Pun, Brenda T.
    Ely, E. Wesley
    Carson, Shannon S.
    Mion, Lorraine
    Barnes-Daly, Mary Ann
    Vasilevskis, Eduard E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 31 (01) : 54 - +
  • [40] Integrating hypertension and HIV care in Namibia: A quality improvement collaborative approach
    Basenero, Apollo
    Neidel, Julie
    Ikeda, Daniel A.
    Ashivudhi, Hilaria
    Mpariwa, Simbarashe
    Kamangu, Jacques W. N.
    Kakubu, Mireille A. Mpalang
    Hans, Linea
    Mutandi, Gram D.
    Jed, Suzanne
    Tjituka, Francina
    Hamunime, Ndapewa
    Agins, Bruce
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (08):