Implementing shared decision making according to the choosing wisely programme: Perioperative medicine for older people undergoing surgery

被引:3
|
作者
Lal, Rajni [1 ]
O'Halloran, Tessa [1 ]
Santhirapala, Ramai [2 ,3 ]
Dhesi, Jugdeep [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Partridge, Judith [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Ageing & Hlth, London, England
[2] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[3] UCL, Div Surg & Intervent Sci, London, England
[4] Kings Coll London, Fac Life Sci & Med, Div Primary Care & Publ Hlth Sci, London, England
关键词
clinician satisfaction; comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA); frailty; patient centered healthcare; patient satisfaction; shared decision making (SDM); PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1111/jep.13827
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Shared decision making (SDM) is the process whereby patients and healthcare professionals work together to achieve a consensus management decision, based on best clinical evidence and patient's preferences. No formal approach to documentation of SDM conversations exists in setting of peri-operative medicine. Objective: To assess and improve the quality and consistency of documentation regarding SDM conversations in an elective surgical outpatient population and appraise the satisfaction of patients and professionals in SDM. Methods: The study was conducted in a geriatrician led perioperative medicine for older people undergoing surgery service, at an inner-city teaching hospital serving a tertiary surgical referral population. The quality improvement programme intervention comprised a Choosing Wisely, UK SDM tool, consisting of Benefits, Risks, Alternatives and Doing Nothing (BRAN mnemonic), clinic posters, patient leaflets, and an introductory SDM workshop and education sessions, and observation and standardised feedback of SDM. Clinic letters were reviewed to identify SDM documentation compliance. Participants included clinicians of all grades and disciplines, and consecutive patients attending the clinic. Results: Clinician interviews revealed inconsistent documentation of SDM. We reviewed 203 clinic letters following the initial implementation of SDM documentation tool, only 59% (n = 120) had fully completement BRAN tool. Additional interventions improved clinic SDM documentation compliance to 98%. A prospective observation study conducted revealed patients and clinician satisfaction at 93% and 79%, respectively. Conclusion: The BRAN tool is adaptable to many health decision settings, including discussions related to treatment, investigations, and procedures, which expands its potential to improve patient safety.
引用
收藏
页码:774 / 780
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Strategies for implementing shared decision making in elective surgery by health care practitioners: A systematic review
    Pham, Clarabelle
    Lizarondo, Lucylynn
    Karnon, Jonathan
    Aromataris, Edoardo
    Munn, Zachary
    Gibb, Catherine
    Fitridge, Robert
    Maddern, Guy
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 26 (02) : 582 - 601
  • [42] Surgery in older patients: learning from shared decision-making in intensive care
    Fowler, Alexander J.
    Stephens, Timothy J.
    Partridge, Judith
    Dhesi, Jugdeep
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 129 (05) : 652 - 655
  • [43] Shared decision-making in urology and female pelvic floor medicine and reconstructive surgery
    David A. Ossin
    Emily C. Carter
    Rufus Cartwright
    Philippe D. Violette
    Shilpa Iyer
    Geraldine T. Klein
    Sangeeta Senapati
    Zachary Klaassen
    Sylvia M. Botros
    Nature Reviews Urology, 2022, 19 : 161 - 170
  • [44] Shared decision-making in urology and female pelvic floor medicine and reconstructive surgery
    Ossin, David A.
    Carter, Emily C.
    Cartwright, Rufus
    Violette, Philippe D.
    Iyer, Shilpa
    Klein, Geraldine T.
    Senapati, Sangeeta
    Klaassen, Zachary
    Botros, Sylvia M.
    NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2022, 19 (03) : 161 - 170
  • [45] Patient and Spine Surgeon Perceptions on Shared Decision-Making in the Treatment of Older Adults Undergoing Corrective Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity
    Deme, Palvasha
    Perera, Anjali
    Chilakapati, Sai
    Stutzman, Sonja
    Singh, Ravinderjit
    Eldridge, Cody M.
    Caruso, James
    Vira, Shaleen
    Aoun, Salah G.
    Makris, Una E.
    Bagley, Carlos A.
    Adogwa, Owoicho
    SPINE, 2022, 47 (10) : 730 - 736
  • [46] A formalized shared decision-making process with individualized decision aids for older patients referred for cardiac surgery
    Gainer, Ryan A.
    Buth, Karen
    Begum, Jahanara
    Hirsch, Gregory M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 67 (01) : E7 - E15
  • [47] Implementing shared decision making in the NHS: lessons from the MAGIC programme (vol 357, j1744, 2017)
    Elwyn, Glyn
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 357
  • [48] The Effect of Implementing A Proactive Care of Older People Undergoing Surgery ('POPS') Team on Length of Stay in Older Surgical Patients
    Bayram, J. M.
    Rangar, D.
    Dikiciyan, J.
    Smith, I.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [49] Older patients' experiences of shared decision-making when choosing treatment for their distal radius fracture; A qualitative study
    Nohr, Louise Marie
    Simony, Ane
    Abrahamsen, Charlotte
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA NURSING, 2025, 56
  • [50] Implementing shared-decision-making for diabetes care across country settings: What really matters to people?
    Tinelli, Michela
    Petrou, Panagiotis
    Samoutis, George
    Traynor, Vivie
    Olympios, George
    McGuire, Alistair
    HEALTH POLICY, 2017, 121 (07) : 786 - 792