Implementing shared decision making according to the choosing wisely programme: Perioperative medicine for older people undergoing surgery

被引:3
|
作者
Lal, Rajni [1 ]
O'Halloran, Tessa [1 ]
Santhirapala, Ramai [2 ,3 ]
Dhesi, Jugdeep [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Partridge, Judith [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Ageing & Hlth, London, England
[2] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[3] UCL, Div Surg & Intervent Sci, London, England
[4] Kings Coll London, Fac Life Sci & Med, Div Primary Care & Publ Hlth Sci, London, England
关键词
clinician satisfaction; comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA); frailty; patient centered healthcare; patient satisfaction; shared decision making (SDM); PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1111/jep.13827
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Shared decision making (SDM) is the process whereby patients and healthcare professionals work together to achieve a consensus management decision, based on best clinical evidence and patient's preferences. No formal approach to documentation of SDM conversations exists in setting of peri-operative medicine. Objective: To assess and improve the quality and consistency of documentation regarding SDM conversations in an elective surgical outpatient population and appraise the satisfaction of patients and professionals in SDM. Methods: The study was conducted in a geriatrician led perioperative medicine for older people undergoing surgery service, at an inner-city teaching hospital serving a tertiary surgical referral population. The quality improvement programme intervention comprised a Choosing Wisely, UK SDM tool, consisting of Benefits, Risks, Alternatives and Doing Nothing (BRAN mnemonic), clinic posters, patient leaflets, and an introductory SDM workshop and education sessions, and observation and standardised feedback of SDM. Clinic letters were reviewed to identify SDM documentation compliance. Participants included clinicians of all grades and disciplines, and consecutive patients attending the clinic. Results: Clinician interviews revealed inconsistent documentation of SDM. We reviewed 203 clinic letters following the initial implementation of SDM documentation tool, only 59% (n = 120) had fully completement BRAN tool. Additional interventions improved clinic SDM documentation compliance to 98%. A prospective observation study conducted revealed patients and clinician satisfaction at 93% and 79%, respectively. Conclusion: The BRAN tool is adaptable to many health decision settings, including discussions related to treatment, investigations, and procedures, which expands its potential to improve patient safety.
引用
收藏
页码:774 / 780
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Shared decision making between older people with multimorbidity and GPs: a qualitative study
    Brown, Emily L.
    Poltawski, Leon
    Pitchforth, Emma
    Richards, Suzanne H.
    Campbell, John L.
    Butterworth, Joanne E.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2022, 72 (721): : E609 - E618
  • [32] Evaluation of the Choosing Wisely Australia 5 Questions resource and a shared decision-making preparation video: protocol for an online experiment
    Muscat, Danielle Marie
    Chang, Edward Hoi-fan
    Thompson, Rachel
    Cvejic, Erin
    Tracy, Marguerite
    Zadro, Joshua
    Smith, Jessica Kathleen
    Lindner, Robyn
    McCaffery, Kirsten
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (11):
  • [33] Genital Surgery for Disorders of Sex Development: Implementing a Shared Decision-Making Approach
    Karkazis, Katrina
    Tamar-Mattis, Anne
    Kon, Alexander A.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2010, 23 (08): : 789 - 805
  • [34] Exploring Shared Care Plans for Older People Regarding their Fulfilment of Policy Requirements and Shared Decision Making
    Condelius, Anna
    Andersson, Magdalena
    RASP-RESEARCH ON AGEING AND SOCIAL POLICY, 2021, 9 (02): : 154 - 183
  • [35] Implementing a perioperative care of older people undergoing surgery (POPS) service: findings from a multi-site qualitative implementation study
    Waring, Justin
    Martin, Graham P.
    Hartley, Peter
    Partridge, Judith S. L.
    Dhesi, Jugdeep K.
    AGE AND AGEING, 2023, 52 (08)
  • [36] The development and application of a logic model to translate an established Perioperative medicine for Older People undergoing Surgery (POPS) service to a novel setting
    Jasper, Emily
    Sevdalis, Nick
    de las Casas, R.
    Meilak, C.
    Whittle, A.
    Partridge, Judith S. L.
    Dhesi, Jugdeep K.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2019, 14
  • [37] Patient and Spine Surgeon Perceptions on Shared Decision Making in the Treatment of Older Adults Undergoing Corrective Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity
    Adogwa, Owoicho
    Perera, Anjali
    Deme, Palvasha
    Chilakapati, Sai
    Caruso, James
    Singh, Ravinderjit
    Eldridge, Cody
    Aoun, Salah
    Makris, Una
    Stutzman, Sonja
    Adogwa, Owoicho
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 135 (02) : 57 - 57
  • [38] The Experience of Older People in the Shared Decision-Making Process in Advanced Kidney Care
    Thomas, Nicola
    Jenkins, Karen
    McManus, Breeda
    Gracey, Brian
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 2016
  • [39] Multiple surgery indications in an older woman undergoing stroke rehabilitation: The rationale of complex decision-making in geriatric medicine
    Barbisoni, P
    Rozzini, R
    Trabucchi, M
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1996, 44 (08) : 982 - 985
  • [40] Shared decision making for perioperative antibiotic use during Mohs micrographic surgery on the lower extremities
    Fronek, Lisa
    Davis, Michael J.
    Greenway, Hubert T.
    Kelley, Benjamin
    JAAD INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 16 : 155 - 162