Meta-analysis of outcomes following intravenous thrombolysis in patients with ischemic stroke on direct oral anticoagulants

被引:7
|
作者
Behnoush, Amir Hossein [1 ,2 ]
Khalaji, Amirmohammad [1 ,2 ]
Bahiraie, Pegah [3 ]
Gupta, Rahul [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Med, Poursina St,Keshavarz Blvd, Tehran 1417613151, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Cardiovasc Dis Res Inst, Tehran Heart Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[3] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Tehran, Iran
[4] Lehigh Valley Hlth Network, Dept Cardiol, Allentown, PA USA
关键词
Intravenous thrombolysis; Stroke; Factor xa inhibitors; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; TISSUE-PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR; RECANALIZATION THERAPIES; HEMORRHAGE; WARFARIN; SAFETY; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1186/s12883-023-03498-8
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background There has been debate on the use of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with ischemic stroke and the recent use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Studies have compared these patients with non-DOAC groups in terms of outcomes. Herein, we aimed to systematically investigate the association between DOAC use and IVT's efficacy and safety outcomes.Results A comprehensive systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Web of Science for the identification of relevant studies. After screening and data extraction, a random-effect meta-analysis was performed to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for comparison of outcomes between patients on DOAC and controls. Six studies were included in the final review. They investigated a total of 254,742 patients, among which 3,499 had recent use of DOACs. The most commonly used DOACs were rivaroxaban and apixaban. The patients on DOAC had significantly higher rates of atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diabetes, and smoking. Good functional outcome defined by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 was significantly lower in patients who received DOACs (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.81, P < 0.01). However, in the subgroup analysis of 90-day mRS 0-2, there was no significant difference between groups (OR 0.71, 95% 0.46 to 1.11, P = 0.14). All-cause mortality was not different between the groups (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.52, P = 0.93). Similarly, there was no significant difference in either of the in-hospital and 90-day mortality subgroups. Regarding symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), the previous DOAC use was not associated with an increased risk of bleeding (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.39, P = 0.92). A similar finding was observed for the meta-analysis of any ICH (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.40, P = 0.18).Conclusions Based on our findings, IVT could be considered as a treatment option in ischemic stroke patients with recent use of DOACs since it was not associated with an increased risk of sICH, as suggested by earlier studies. Further larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and establish the safety of IVT in patients on DOAC.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A systematic review and meta-analysis on the outcomes of carotid endarterectomy after intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke
    Squizzato, Francesco
    Zivelonghi, Cecilia
    Menegolo, Mirko
    Xodo, Andrea
    Colacchio, Elda Chiara
    De Massari, Chiara
    Grego, Franco
    Piazza, Michele
    Antonello, Michele
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2025, 81 (01)
  • [32] Diffusion MRI Reversibility in Ischemic Stroke Following Thrombolysis: A Meta-Analysis
    Lakomkin, Nikita
    Pan, Jonathan
    Stein, Laura
    Malkani, Brijesh
    Dhamoon, Mandip
    Mocco, J.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, 2020, 30 (04) : 471 - 476
  • [33] Intravenous Thrombolysis Before Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis
    Du, Houwei
    Lei, Hanhan
    Ambler, Gareth
    Fang, Shuangfang
    He, Raoli
    Yuan, Qilin
    Werring, David J.
    Liu, Nan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2021, 10 (23):
  • [34] Intravenous thrombolysis prior to endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis
    Zheng, Wei
    Lei, Hanhan
    Lin, Xiaojuan
    Liu, Nan
    Tang, Yi
    Wu, Jing
    Fang, Shuangfang
    Lin, Zhaomin
    Xia, Pincang
    Du, Houwei
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 43 (10) : 5993 - 6002
  • [35] Intravenous thrombolysis prior to endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis
    Wei Zheng
    Hanhan Lei
    Xiaojuan Lin
    Nan Liu
    Yi Tang
    Jing Wu
    Shuangfang Fang
    Zhaomin Lin
    Pincang Xia
    Houwei Du
    Neurological Sciences, 2022, 43 : 5993 - 6002
  • [36] Intravenous thrombolysis for ischemic stroke in the posterior circulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Knapen, Robrecht R. M. M.
    Frol, Senta
    Kuijk, Sander M. J. van
    Oblak, Janja Pretnar
    van der Leij, Christiaan
    van Oostenbrugge, Robert J.
    van Zwam, Wim H.
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2024, 33 (05):
  • [37] Intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patients with pre-stroke disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bao, Qiangji
    Wu, Xinting
    Li, Yiming
    Chen, Shujun
    Zhang, Qiang
    Yang, Mingfei
    Yang, Peng
    BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2024, 14 (02):
  • [38] Recurrent Ischemic Stroke and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With Ischemic Stroke Despite Direct Oral Anticoagulants
    Hsieh, Meng-Tsang
    Liu, Chi-Hung
    Lin, Sheng-Hsiang
    Lin, Po-Yu
    Chang, Yu-Ming
    Wang, Chun-Min
    Chen, Chih-Hung
    Sung, Pi-Shan
    STROKE, 2023, 54 (04) : E145 - E146
  • [39] Real-World Outcomes of Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment with Intravenous Thrombolysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Qin, Bin
    Zhao, Ming-Jun
    Chen, Hong
    Qin, Huixun
    Zhao, Libo
    Fu, Lin
    Qin, Cheng
    Yang, Mingxiu
    Gao, Wen
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2018, 27 (12): : 3542 - 3548
  • [40] Efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in cancer patients: a systemic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Sui
    Lu, Xuan
    Tang, Liang, V
    Hu, Yu
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 12 (08): : 4795 - 4806