Meta-analysis of outcomes following intravenous thrombolysis in patients with ischemic stroke on direct oral anticoagulants

被引:7
|
作者
Behnoush, Amir Hossein [1 ,2 ]
Khalaji, Amirmohammad [1 ,2 ]
Bahiraie, Pegah [3 ]
Gupta, Rahul [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Med, Poursina St,Keshavarz Blvd, Tehran 1417613151, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Cardiovasc Dis Res Inst, Tehran Heart Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[3] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Tehran, Iran
[4] Lehigh Valley Hlth Network, Dept Cardiol, Allentown, PA USA
关键词
Intravenous thrombolysis; Stroke; Factor xa inhibitors; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; TISSUE-PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR; RECANALIZATION THERAPIES; HEMORRHAGE; WARFARIN; SAFETY; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1186/s12883-023-03498-8
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background There has been debate on the use of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with ischemic stroke and the recent use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Studies have compared these patients with non-DOAC groups in terms of outcomes. Herein, we aimed to systematically investigate the association between DOAC use and IVT's efficacy and safety outcomes.Results A comprehensive systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Web of Science for the identification of relevant studies. After screening and data extraction, a random-effect meta-analysis was performed to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for comparison of outcomes between patients on DOAC and controls. Six studies were included in the final review. They investigated a total of 254,742 patients, among which 3,499 had recent use of DOACs. The most commonly used DOACs were rivaroxaban and apixaban. The patients on DOAC had significantly higher rates of atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diabetes, and smoking. Good functional outcome defined by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 was significantly lower in patients who received DOACs (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.81, P < 0.01). However, in the subgroup analysis of 90-day mRS 0-2, there was no significant difference between groups (OR 0.71, 95% 0.46 to 1.11, P = 0.14). All-cause mortality was not different between the groups (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.52, P = 0.93). Similarly, there was no significant difference in either of the in-hospital and 90-day mortality subgroups. Regarding symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), the previous DOAC use was not associated with an increased risk of bleeding (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.39, P = 0.92). A similar finding was observed for the meta-analysis of any ICH (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.40, P = 0.18).Conclusions Based on our findings, IVT could be considered as a treatment option in ischemic stroke patients with recent use of DOACs since it was not associated with an increased risk of sICH, as suggested by earlier studies. Further larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and establish the safety of IVT in patients on DOAC.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mechanical Thrombectomy Outcomes With and Without Intravenous Thrombolysis in Stroke Patients A Meta-Analysis
    Mistry, Eva A.
    Mistry, Akshitkumar M.
    Nakawah, Mohammad Obadah
    Chitale, Rohan V.
    James, Robert F.
    Volpi, John J.
    Fusco, Matthew R.
    STROKE, 2017, 48 (09) : 2450 - +
  • [22] Statin Use and Outcomes of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated With Intravenous Thrombolysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Guo, Yu
    Guo, Xinmei
    Zhao, Kai
    Bao, Qiangji
    Yang, Jincai
    Yang, Mingfei
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [23] Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients With Ischemic Stroke and Recent Ingestion of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (vol 80, pg 233, 2023)
    Meinel, T. R.
    Wilson, D.
    Gensicke, H.
    JAMA NEUROLOGY, 2023, 80 (04) : 422 - 422
  • [24] A meta-analysis of intravenous thrombolysis versus bridging therapy for ischemic stroke
    Wang, Raoqiong
    Li, Shuangyang
    Hao, Linyao
    Wang, Zhichuan
    Ge, Zhengxin
    Yang, Sijin
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (39) : E30879
  • [25] Author Reply to "Intravenous thrombolysis in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (European stroke organisation intravenous thrombolysis guidelines comment)
    De Marchis, Gian Marco
    Turc, Guillaume
    Whiteley, William
    Tsivgoulis, Georgios
    EUROPEAN STROKE JOURNAL, 2021, 6 (04) : 447 - 449
  • [26] Association of Atrial Fibrillation with Outcomes in Stroke Patients receiving Intravenous Thrombolysis: A Meta-Analysis
    Chowdhury, S.
    Calic, Z.
    Bhaskar, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2022, 29 : 368 - 368
  • [27] Higher efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke taking direct oral anticoagulants-A new relevant hypothesis
    Frol, Senta
    Oblak, Janja Pretnar
    Kermer, Pawel
    Ntaios, George
    Papanagiotou, Panagiotis
    Sabovic, Miso
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [28] Tirofiban for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Receiving Intravenous Thrombolysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Shi, Heng
    Hou, Miao-Miao
    Ren, Gang
    He, Ze-Fan
    Liu, Xiao-Lei
    Li, Xin-Yi
    Sun, Bo
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2023, 52 (05) : 587 - 596
  • [29] Dual antiplatelet therapy after intravenous thrombolysis for patients with minor ischemic stroke:A meta-analysis
    Zeng, Jing
    Xin, Wenli
    Tang, Shuang
    Xiang, Chengwei
    Zeng, Chun
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 238
  • [30] Prior Antiplatelet Agent Use and Outcomes after Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis
    Pan, Xiding
    Yang, Jie
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2014, 38 : 17 - 18