A novel technique for quantifying the fate of CO2 injected in oil reservoir for geological utilization and storage

被引:5
|
作者
Hu, Ting [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Wang, Yanfei [3 ]
Xu, Tianfu [1 ,2 ]
Tian, Hailong [1 ,2 ]
Rui, Zhenhua [4 ,5 ]
Zhao, Yang [4 ,5 ]
Liu, TingTing [6 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Key Lab Groundwater Resources & Environm, Minist Educ, Changchun 130021, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Univ, Jilin Prov Key Lab Water Resources & Environm, Changchun 130021, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geol & Geophys, Key Lab Petr Resources Res, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[4] China Univ Petr, State Key Lab Petr Resources & Prospecting, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[5] China Univ Petr, Coll Petr Engn, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[6] China Univ Petr Karamay, Coll Petr Engn, Karamay 834000, Peoples R China
关键词
Carbon sequestration; Geochemical kinetics reactions; Inter-well connectivity; Fate of injectedCO2; WELL-RATE FLUCTUATIONS; INTERWELL CONNECTIVITY; MINERAL ALTERATION; CARBON-DIOXIDE; MODEL; FLOW; SEQUESTRATION; PRECIPITATION; CAPROCK; EOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyr.2023.04.364
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
CO2-enhanced oil recovery (CO2-EOR) is a potential CO2 capture, utilization, and storage technology. In particular, CO2 can break the hydrochemical balance of water-rock and converts into carbonate minerals which are the most stable sequestration phase. The water-rock reactions are complex kinetic processes because the rate of dissolution/precipitation of minerals are vary with the pH of the forma-tion water. However, studies on the effect of geochemical reactions on CO2-EOR processes are lacking, and the fate of CO2 cannot be accurately quantified. In this study, we combine the characteristics of the oil phase into the thermal-hydraulic-chemical TOUGHREACT simulator to consider various water-rock geochemical kinetic reactions in CO2-EOR. Therefore, the distribution phase of CO2 can be determined completely in the reservoir. Our analyses use the realistic fluid property (pressure- volume-temperature) of multicomponent oil phase-CO2 mixtures. The model considers the possible geochemical reactions and the resulting changes in porosity and permeability. The results indicate that in gas-water cycle of 9% hydrocarbon pore volume CO2 slug, the largest distributed phase of CO2 is the gas phase, accounting for 52.2% during the CO2 injection period. After water injection, the solubility of CO2 in the oil phase increases, and CO2 is mostly dissolved in the oil phase, accounting for 53.0%. Without considering the water-rock geochemical reactions will result in an underestimation of the dissolved aqueous phase and correspondingly the others were overestimated. The maximum error of the distributed quantity is up to 6.4% of the total injection. In addition, the omission of water-rock reactions result in an underestimation of the oil recovery. Comparing with the CO2 storage in a saline aquifer, dissolution of CO2 in oil phase in CO2-EOR scenario dampens the effect of buoyancy, which leads to higher sequestration capacity for the same footprint of storage reservoir.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:5350 / 5361
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Measurement of interfacial tension for the CO2 injected crude oil plus reservoir water system
    Sun, CY
    Chen, GJ
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING DATA, 2005, 50 (03): : 936 - 938
  • [42] Experimental Study on Miscible Phase and Imbibition Displacement of Crude Oil Injected with CO2 in Shale Oil Reservoir
    He, Haibo
    Ma, Xinfang
    Wang, Bo
    Zhang, Yuzhi
    Mou, Jianye
    Wu, Jiarui
    Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 2024, 14 (22):
  • [43] CO2 Geological Storage Potential in Korea
    Huh, Dae-Gee
    Park, Yong-Chan
    Yoo, Dong-Geun
    Hwang, Se-Ho
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 4881 - 4888
  • [44] Potential for geological storage of CO2 in the Netherlands
    Schreurs, HCE
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, VOLS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 303 - 308
  • [45] AN OVERVIEW OF CO2 GEOLOGICAL STORAGE IN CHINA
    Qiao, Xiaojuan
    Li, Guomin
    MeDermott, Christopher I.
    Wu, Runjian
    Haszeldine, R. Stuart
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 9 (07): : 889 - 896
  • [46] CO2 Geological Storage - Geotechnical Implications
    Espinoza, D. N.
    Kim, S. H.
    Santamarina, J. C.
    KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2011, 15 (04) : 707 - 719
  • [47] Geomechanical Evaluation of Thermal Impact of Injected CO2 Temperature on a Geological Reservoir: Application to the FutureGen 2.0 Site
    Bonneville, Alain
    Ba Nghiep Nguyen
    Stewart, Mark
    Hou, Z. Jason
    Murray, Christopher
    Gilmore, Tyler
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-12, 2014, 63 : 3298 - 3304
  • [48] Capture and geological storage of CO2:: An overview
    Rojey, A
    Torp, TA
    OIL & GAS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-REVUE D IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES, 2005, 60 (03): : 445 - 448
  • [49] Economics of geological CO2 storage and leakage
    van der Zwaan, Bob
    Gerlagh, Reyer
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2009, 93 (3-4) : 285 - 309
  • [50] CO2 geological storage — Geotechnical implications
    D. N. Espinoza
    S. H. Kim
    J. C. Santamarina
    KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2011, 15 : 707 - 719