A novel technique for quantifying the fate of CO2 injected in oil reservoir for geological utilization and storage

被引:5
|
作者
Hu, Ting [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Wang, Yanfei [3 ]
Xu, Tianfu [1 ,2 ]
Tian, Hailong [1 ,2 ]
Rui, Zhenhua [4 ,5 ]
Zhao, Yang [4 ,5 ]
Liu, TingTing [6 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Key Lab Groundwater Resources & Environm, Minist Educ, Changchun 130021, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Univ, Jilin Prov Key Lab Water Resources & Environm, Changchun 130021, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geol & Geophys, Key Lab Petr Resources Res, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[4] China Univ Petr, State Key Lab Petr Resources & Prospecting, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[5] China Univ Petr, Coll Petr Engn, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[6] China Univ Petr Karamay, Coll Petr Engn, Karamay 834000, Peoples R China
关键词
Carbon sequestration; Geochemical kinetics reactions; Inter-well connectivity; Fate of injectedCO2; WELL-RATE FLUCTUATIONS; INTERWELL CONNECTIVITY; MINERAL ALTERATION; CARBON-DIOXIDE; MODEL; FLOW; SEQUESTRATION; PRECIPITATION; CAPROCK; EOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyr.2023.04.364
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
CO2-enhanced oil recovery (CO2-EOR) is a potential CO2 capture, utilization, and storage technology. In particular, CO2 can break the hydrochemical balance of water-rock and converts into carbonate minerals which are the most stable sequestration phase. The water-rock reactions are complex kinetic processes because the rate of dissolution/precipitation of minerals are vary with the pH of the forma-tion water. However, studies on the effect of geochemical reactions on CO2-EOR processes are lacking, and the fate of CO2 cannot be accurately quantified. In this study, we combine the characteristics of the oil phase into the thermal-hydraulic-chemical TOUGHREACT simulator to consider various water-rock geochemical kinetic reactions in CO2-EOR. Therefore, the distribution phase of CO2 can be determined completely in the reservoir. Our analyses use the realistic fluid property (pressure- volume-temperature) of multicomponent oil phase-CO2 mixtures. The model considers the possible geochemical reactions and the resulting changes in porosity and permeability. The results indicate that in gas-water cycle of 9% hydrocarbon pore volume CO2 slug, the largest distributed phase of CO2 is the gas phase, accounting for 52.2% during the CO2 injection period. After water injection, the solubility of CO2 in the oil phase increases, and CO2 is mostly dissolved in the oil phase, accounting for 53.0%. Without considering the water-rock geochemical reactions will result in an underestimation of the dissolved aqueous phase and correspondingly the others were overestimated. The maximum error of the distributed quantity is up to 6.4% of the total injection. In addition, the omission of water-rock reactions result in an underestimation of the oil recovery. Comparing with the CO2 storage in a saline aquifer, dissolution of CO2 in oil phase in CO2-EOR scenario dampens the effect of buoyancy, which leads to higher sequestration capacity for the same footprint of storage reservoir.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:5350 / 5361
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Density-driven enhanced dissolution of injected CO2 during long-term CO2 geological storage
    Zhang, Wei
    JOURNAL OF EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE, 2013, 122 (05) : 1387 - 1397
  • [32] A Laboratory Study of Coinjection of Water and CO2 to Improve Oil Recovery and CO2 Storage: Effect of Fraction of CO2 Injected
    Ajoma, Emmanuel
    Sungkachart, Thanarat
    Saira
    Yin, Hang
    Le-Hussain, Furqan
    SPE JOURNAL, 2021, 26 (04): : 2139 - 2147
  • [33] An assessment of Queensland's CO2 geological storage prospectivity - the Queensland CO2 Geological Storage Atlas
    Bradshaw, Barry E.
    Spencer, Lynton K.
    Lahtinen, Anna-Liisa
    Khider, Kamal
    Ryan, Damien J.
    Colwell, Jim B.
    Chirinos, Alfredo
    Bradshaw, John
    Draper, John J.
    Hodgkinson, Jonathan
    McKillop, Mike
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 4583 - 4590
  • [34] The evolving perception of risk during reservoir evaluation projects for geological storage of CO2
    Polson, Debbie
    Curtis, Andrew
    Vivalda, Claudia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2012, 9 : 10 - 23
  • [35] Risk evaluation of CO2 leakage through fracture zone in geological storage reservoir
    Wang, Zhiqiang
    Li, Hangyu
    Liu, Shuyang
    Xu, Jianchun
    Liu, Junrong
    Wang, Xiaopu
    FUEL, 2023, 342
  • [36] The Baltic Basin: structure, properties of reservoir rocks, and capacity for geological storage of CO2
    Shogenova, Alla
    Sliaupa, Saulius
    Vaher, Rein
    Shogenov, Kazbulat
    Pomeranceva, Raisa
    ESTONIAN JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES, 2009, 58 (04) : 259 - 267
  • [37] Optimum design of CO2 storage and oil recovery under geological uncertainty
    Ampomah, W.
    Balch, R. S.
    Cather, M.
    Will, R.
    Gonda, D.
    Dai, Z.
    Soltanian, M. R.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 195 : 80 - 92
  • [38] Geochemical study of the reactivity of a carbonate rock in a geological storage of CO2 : implications of co-injected gases
    Renard, Stephane
    Sterpenich, Jerome
    Pironon, Jacques
    Chiquet, Pierre
    Lescanne, Marc
    Randi, Aurelien
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 5364 - 5369
  • [39] Integrated study on CO2 enhanced oil recovery and geological storage in tight oil reservoirs
    Li, Lei
    Liu, Yunfan
    Su, Yuliang
    Niu, Hongwei
    Hou, Zihan
    Hao, Yongmao
    GEOENERGY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 241
  • [40] A numerical feasibility study of CO2 foam for carbon utilization and storage in a depleted, high salinity, carbonate oil reservoir
    Bello, Ayomikun
    Dorhjie, Desmond Batsa
    Ivanova, Anastasia
    Cheremisin, Alexey
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):