Nitrate and Ammonium Removals from Groundwater by Permeable Reactive Barrier Method (PRB): Column Experiments

被引:0
|
作者
Amani, Sohrab [1 ]
Akbari, Zahra [1 ]
Ghiassi, Reza [1 ]
Ehsani, Saeed [1 ]
Rezaeishirazi, Milad [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Coll Engn, Sch Civil Engn, Water & Environm Measurement & Monitoring Lab, Tehran, Iran
来源
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION | 2024年 / 235卷 / 02期
关键词
Groundwater contamination; In situ remediation; Permeable reactive barrier; Ammonium; Nitrate; Removal; DRINKING-WATER NITRATE; HEAVY-METAL; REMEDIATION; NITROGEN;
D O I
10.1007/s11270-024-06936-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the growth of industry and agriculture, nitrogenous compounds like nitrate and ammonium have contributed significantly to the contamination of groundwater. These pollutants cause intoxication and even may lead to stomach cancer. Permeable reactive barrier (PRB) is considered an in situ and low-cost method for groundwater treatment. This research aims to evaluate six different inexpensive reactive substances such as perlite and sand (1:1), cocopeat and sand (1:1), activated carbon, sawdust and sand (1:1), zeolite, and pumice for removing nitrate with an initial concentration of 100 mgL(-1) and three reactive materials such as Leca, vermiculite and pumice (1:1), and cocopeat and pumice (1:1) for removing ammonium with two initial concentrations of 20 mgL(-1) and 40 mgL(-1) utilizing column experiments. Some of these absorbents have been rarely used in PRB to remove nitrogenous compounds. The plexiglass column utilized in column experiments and water flow through the layer in the column is due to the constant head difference. Results showed that all the reactive materials that have been used in removing nitrate had good performance with a minimum removal percentage above 73%. The best performance among these reactive substances belonged to a mixture of perlite and sand (1:1) with a maximum removal efficiency of 100%. The mixture of cocopeat and pumice (1:1) had the best performance among the materials were chosen for the ammonium treatment, with maximum removal percentages of 80% and 70% for initial concentrations of 20 mgL(-1) and 40 mgL(-1), respectively. Variations in the permeability coefficient of the reactive materials were investigated in this study, as an essential factor in the lifespan of the reactant during the column experiments. Results of constant head permeability tests revealed that a rapid drop was observed in the reactive layer's permeability coefficient during the period leading up to the maximum removal percentage and then a subsequent minor decline occurred.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Performance of a field-scale biological permeable reactive barrier for in-situ remediation of nitrate-contaminated groundwater
    Gibert, Oriol
    Assal, Antoine
    Devlin, Hayley
    Elliot, Trevor
    Kalinc, Robert M.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 659 : 211 - 220
  • [42] In-situ Denitrification of Nitrate-nitrogen Contaminated Groundwater by a Permeable Reactive Barrier Using Sulfur-Limestone
    Lee, Seongwon
    Tase, Norio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY-CHIGAKU ZASSHI, 2023, 132 (03) : 231 - 246
  • [43] Evaluation of Natural Zeolite as a Material for Permeable Reactive Barrier for Remediation of Zinc-Contaminated Groundwater Based on Column Study
    Nediljka Vukojević Medvidović
    Ivona Nuić
    Marin Ugrina
    Marina Trgo
    [J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2018, 229
  • [44] Evaluation of Natural Zeolite as a Material for Permeable Reactive Barrier for Remediation of Zinc-Contaminated Groundwater Based on Column Study
    Medvidovic, Nediljka Vukojevic
    Nuic, Ivona
    Ugrina, Marin
    Trgo, Marina
    [J]. WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2018, 229 (11):
  • [45] A feasibility study on the remediation of complex contaminated groundwater in landfill sites using advanced oxidation-permeable reactive barrier (PRB) approach.
    You, Yu-Qing
    Hao, Na
    Zhan, Liang-Tong
    Song, Xue
    [J]. Zhongguo Huanjing Kexue/China Environmental Science, 2024, 44 (10): : 5620 - 5629
  • [46] Microbially Mediated Clinoptilolite Regeneration in a Multifunctional Permeable Reactive Barrier Used to Remove Ammonium from Landfill Leachate Contamination: Laboratory Column Evaluation
    Van Nooten, Thomas
    Diels, Ludo
    Bastiaens, Leen
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (09) : 3486 - 3492
  • [47] Remediation of chromate contaminated groundwater by a new design of a permeable reactive barrier
    Flury, B.
    Eggenberger, U.
    Maedder, U.
    Schenker, F.
    [J]. WATER-ROCK INTERACTION, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 577 - 581
  • [48] A review of permeable reactive barrier as passive sustainable technology for groundwater remediation
    A. A. H. Faisal
    A. H. Sulaymon
    Q. M. Khaliefa
    [J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2018, 15 : 1123 - 1138
  • [49] Microbial characterization of groundwater undergoing treatment with a permeable reactive iron barrier
    Da Silva, Marcio L. B.
    Johnson, Richard L.
    Alvarez, Pedro J. J.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2007, 24 (08) : 1122 - 1127
  • [50] A systematic analysis of research trends on the permeable reactive barrier in groundwater remediation
    Vakili, M.
    Ebadi, T.
    Hajbabaie, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024,