Nitrate and Ammonium Removals from Groundwater by Permeable Reactive Barrier Method (PRB): Column Experiments

被引:0
|
作者
Amani, Sohrab [1 ]
Akbari, Zahra [1 ]
Ghiassi, Reza [1 ]
Ehsani, Saeed [1 ]
Rezaeishirazi, Milad [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Coll Engn, Sch Civil Engn, Water & Environm Measurement & Monitoring Lab, Tehran, Iran
来源
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION | 2024年 / 235卷 / 02期
关键词
Groundwater contamination; In situ remediation; Permeable reactive barrier; Ammonium; Nitrate; Removal; DRINKING-WATER NITRATE; HEAVY-METAL; REMEDIATION; NITROGEN;
D O I
10.1007/s11270-024-06936-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the growth of industry and agriculture, nitrogenous compounds like nitrate and ammonium have contributed significantly to the contamination of groundwater. These pollutants cause intoxication and even may lead to stomach cancer. Permeable reactive barrier (PRB) is considered an in situ and low-cost method for groundwater treatment. This research aims to evaluate six different inexpensive reactive substances such as perlite and sand (1:1), cocopeat and sand (1:1), activated carbon, sawdust and sand (1:1), zeolite, and pumice for removing nitrate with an initial concentration of 100 mgL(-1) and three reactive materials such as Leca, vermiculite and pumice (1:1), and cocopeat and pumice (1:1) for removing ammonium with two initial concentrations of 20 mgL(-1) and 40 mgL(-1) utilizing column experiments. Some of these absorbents have been rarely used in PRB to remove nitrogenous compounds. The plexiglass column utilized in column experiments and water flow through the layer in the column is due to the constant head difference. Results showed that all the reactive materials that have been used in removing nitrate had good performance with a minimum removal percentage above 73%. The best performance among these reactive substances belonged to a mixture of perlite and sand (1:1) with a maximum removal efficiency of 100%. The mixture of cocopeat and pumice (1:1) had the best performance among the materials were chosen for the ammonium treatment, with maximum removal percentages of 80% and 70% for initial concentrations of 20 mgL(-1) and 40 mgL(-1), respectively. Variations in the permeability coefficient of the reactive materials were investigated in this study, as an essential factor in the lifespan of the reactant during the column experiments. Results of constant head permeability tests revealed that a rapid drop was observed in the reactive layer's permeability coefficient during the period leading up to the maximum removal percentage and then a subsequent minor decline occurred.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Status Review of Groundwater Pollution Restoration by Permeable Reactive Barrier
    Shi Hongwei
    Xu Guangquan
    He Xiaowen
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ASIAN-EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY AND KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER, 2008, : 210 - 214
  • [32] Fungal permeable reactive barrier to remediate groundwater in an artificial aquifer
    Folch, Albert
    Vilaplana, Marcel
    Amado, Leila
    Vicent, Teresa
    Caminal, Gloria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2013, 262 : 554 - 560
  • [33] Application of kinetic models to the design of a calcite permeable reactive barrier (PRB) for fluoride remediation
    Cai, Qianqian
    Turner, Brett D.
    Sheng, Daichao
    Sloan, Scott
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2018, 130 : 300 - 311
  • [34] Zeolites in a permeable reactive barrier (PRB): One-year of field experience in a refinery groundwater. Part 2: Zeolite characterization
    Vignola, Rodolfo
    Bagatin, Roberto
    D'Auris, Alessandra De Folly
    Massara, Elisabetta Previde
    Ghisletti, Danila
    Millini, Roberto
    Sisto, Raffaello
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2011, 178 : 210 - 216
  • [35] Removal of ammonium-nitrogen from groundwater using a fully passive permeable reactive barrier with oxygen-releasing compound and clinoptilolite
    Huang, Guoxin
    Liu, Fei
    Yang, Yingzhao
    Deng, Wei
    Li, Shengpin
    Huang, Yuanying
    Kong, Xiangke
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 154 : 1 - 7
  • [36] Artificial Neural Network (ANN) for Evaluating Permeability Decline in Permeable Reactive Barrier (PRB)
    Santisukkasaem U.
    Olawuyi F.
    Oye P.
    Das D.B.
    [J]. Environmental Processes, 2015, 2 (02) : 291 - 307
  • [38] Iron foundry slags as permeable reactive barrier materials for removing arsenic from groundwater
    Geological Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1415 Engineering Drive, Madison, WI 53706, United States
    不详
    [J]. Geotech Spec Publ, 2007, 163
  • [39] Low-Cost Permeable Reactive Barrier (PRB) System to Treat the Organic Compounds and Nutrients in the Groundwater Contaminated by the Landfill-Leachate
    Kankanige, D. M.
    Dayanthi, W. K. C. N.
    Nagasinghe, I. U.
    Disanayaka, A. M.
    Kawamoto, K.
    [J]. ENGINEER-JOURNAL OF THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS SRI LANKA, 2019, 52 (02): : 15 - 25
  • [40] Zinc and nickel removal from aqueous solution by activated carbon in batch and permeable reactive barrier (PRB) systems
    Ebrahim, M. A. Ale
    Ebadi, T.
    [J]. DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2018, 118 : 181 - 194